Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    Hands-On Career Preparation
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    Alternative Pathways
Sign In
Illustration of the back of a female grad student/teacher’s head as she erases a target from the blackboard and paper airplanes fly toward her.
Taylor Callery for the Chronicle

Teaching Evaluations Are Racist, Sexist, and Often Useless

It’s time to put these flawed measures in their place.

The Review | Opinion
By David Delgado Shorter July 11, 2023

In the fall of 2019, while compiling my files for promotion, I spent some time looking over my teaching evaluations from the previous three years. I was a bit shook. One student complained that I came into class wearing a jacket and that, by taking the jacket off in front of the students, it was as if I was undressing in front of them. Other narrative assessments, while less bizarre, were no more on topic. Although I received mostly nines out of 10 for a range of standards, the narrative portions of the evaluations were largely personal, free of any discussion of the course and its materials. Talking this over with my colleagues, I learned that what I was seeing had been much worse for my Black and Asian colleagues, particularly if they were women.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

In the fall of 2019, while compiling my files for promotion, I spent some time looking over my teaching evaluations from the previous three years. I was a bit shook. One student complained that I came into class wearing a jacket and that, by taking the jacket off in front of the students, it was as if I was undressing in front of them. Other narrative assessments, while less bizarre, were no more on topic. Although I received mostly nines out of 10 for a range of standards, the narrative portions of the evaluations were largely personal, free of any discussion of the course and its materials. Talking this over with my colleagues, I learned that what I was seeing had been much worse for my Black and Asian colleagues, particularly if they were women.

So I raised the matter in a faculty meeting. “How can we ethically, much less legally, use student evaluations as a basis for our merit reviews?” As usual, be careful raising an issue in a faculty meeting: I was asked to come back with research on the matter.

I found almost 80 peer-reviewed papers demonstrating the gender and racial bias afflicting teaching evaluations, going back to 1979. Study after study showed increasingly disturbing statistics: Women were routinely rated lower than men, younger women were evaluated as less professional than their older female or male counterparts, women of color were rated as less effective than white women, and so on.

A few particularly stunned me. In a meta-analysis of 126 data-rich studies, Rebecca Kreitzer and Jennie Sweet-Cushman (2021) were able to find that — surprise! — evaluations were higher for courses with less work, for electives, and for classes where cookies or chocolate were provided to students. Bob Uttl, Carmela A. White, and Daniela Wong Gonzalez (2017) reviewed previous studies and reanalyzed their data to show “no significant correlations between … ratings and learning.” These biased and ineffective tools have been affirmed by professional organizations and highly ranked universities.

In 2019, the American Sociological Association issued a formal recommendation to cease using student evaluations for merit and promotion decisions unless part of a much broader (“holistic”) assessment. In reaching its conclusion, the ASA not only identified bias based on gender and sex, but also on such seemingly innocent factors as the time of day a course was taught.

At least a few colleges have taken steps to mitigate these problems. The University of Southern California no longer includes student evaluations as an element of tenure and promotion. If we assume that other professionals and experts in our respective fields should help articulate the value of our scholarly work, why then defer our teaching evaluations to students who have no training in pedagogy, much less knowledge of what constitutes effective teaching within our chosen areas? The University of Oregon, the University of Nebraska at Lincoln, and others have already established that student evaluations may be useful but should be combined with other forms of assessment in personnel decisions. If you are considering raising this issue on your campus, consider that the ASA statement has received nearly two dozen endorsements by professional organizations.

If colleges continue to use student evaluations of teaching as a basis for merit and promotion, they may be headed toward legal trouble.

If colleges continue to use student evaluations of teaching as a basis for merit and promotion at all, they may be headed toward legal trouble. In 2009, the faculty association at Ryerson University (now Toronto Metropolitan University) disputed the value of student evaluations as the basis for promotion. After a full review of the evidence, an arbitrator, William Kaplan, saw “serious and inherent limitations” of the evaluations by students. He wrote that such evaluations are “imperfect at best and downright biased and unreliable at worst.”

In the case of my own department, when I presented the research that I had completed, it took about 20 minutes for us to decide that we did not want to put our junior faculty in the position of depending on student evaluations for their job security. We also did not want to put ourselves in a legal quandary. Although we cannot prevent the university from soliciting students’ evaluations — and some of us find them quite useful in rethinking our assignments, lecture style, and course content — we now enable faculty members to use peer-assessment and self-evaluations, including documented revisions to pedagogical statements. We are fortunate at the University of California at Los Angeles to have a formal system for pedagogical evaluation by our colleagues (we call it “peer-assisted reflections on student learning”) to help our instructors build summative teaching portfolios. We have resolved to keep student evaluations firmly in their place.

A version of this article appeared in the August 4, 2023, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Opinion The Workplace Teaching & Learning
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
David Delgado Shorter
David Delgado Shorter is a professor in the department of world arts and cultures at the University of California at Los Angeles.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Graphic vector illustration of a ship with education-like embellishments being tossed on a black sea with a Kraken-esque elephant trunk ascending from the depth against a stormy red background.
Creeping concerns
Most Colleges Aren’t a Target of Trump (Yet). Here’s How Their Presidents Are Leading.
Photo-based illustration of calendars on a wall (July, August and September) with a red line marking through most of the dates
'A Creative Solution'
Facing Federal Uncertainty, Swarthmore Makes a Novel Plan: the 3-Month Budget
Marva Johnson is set to take the helm of Florida A&M University this summer.
Leadership & governance
‘Surprising': A DeSantis-Backed Lobbyist Is Tapped to Lead Florida A&M
Students and community members protest outside of Coffman Memorial Union at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis, on Tuesday, April 23, 2024.
Campus Activism
One Year After the Encampments, Campuses Are Quieter and Quicker to Stop Protests

From The Review

Glenn Loury in Providence, R.I. on May 7, 2024.
The Review | Conversation
Glenn Loury on the ‘Barbarians at the Gates’
By Evan Goldstein, Len Gutkin
Illustration showing a valedictorian speaker who's tassel is a vintage microphone
The Review | Opinion
A Graduation Speaker Gets Canceled
By Corey Robin
Illustration showing a stack of coins and a university building falling over
The Review | Opinion
Here’s What Congress’s Endowment-Tax Plan Might Cost Your College
By Phillip Levine

Upcoming Events

Ascendium_06-10-25_Plain.png
Views on College and Alternative Pathways
Coursera_06-17-25_Plain.png
AI and Microcredentials
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin