Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
The Review

Teaching Trump

By Christina M. Greer October 30, 2016
Teaching Trump 1
Illustration by André da Loba for The Chronicle Review

I love teaching during an election year. Most of my students are voting for the first time in their lives, and it is my job to explain to them the significance of their vote and, I hope, inspire a new generation of voters. Nothing is more rewarding than discussing the voting process and results the days after the election. Excited students enter the classroom comparing notes on whether or not their polling stations had long lines, how they felt when they submitted their ballots, and if they noticed any demographic patterns, be it race, class, or age.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

I love teaching during an election year. Most of my students are voting for the first time in their lives, and it is my job to explain to them the significance of their vote and, I hope, inspire a new generation of voters. Nothing is more rewarding than discussing the voting process and results the days after the election. Excited students enter the classroom comparing notes on whether or not their polling stations had long lines, how they felt when they submitted their ballots, and if they noticed any demographic patterns, be it race, class, or age.

This year is a bit different. Many of my students do not feel invested in or confident about either candidate. My Democratic students are “with her,” largely because they feel that the real-estate mogul Donald Trump is a racist, homophobic, anti-Semitic, anti-immigrant, misogynistic charlatan, and they fear that he would be devastating to our nation and our allies if elected.

My Republican students are quite torn. They refuse to vote for Hillary Clinton for a host of reasons, they say — email servers, overall untrustworthiness, her foreign-policy record, among others. However, they don’t believe that Trump adequately represents their party or ideas. They are also concerned that a vote for Trump would signal that they too are racist, homophobic, anti-Semitic, anti-immigrant misogynists.

6310-Election Issue
The Election Issue
With the finish line in sight for the presidential campaign of 2016, we decided to devote our pages to essays that examine and challenge the way we think about politics, democracy, and the American electorate. Why do voters make the choices that they do? How could political scientists have failed to foresee this year’s tectonic political shifts? And what aftershocks can we expect in the wake of Donald Trump? We tackle these and other questions in this special issue of The Chronicle Review.
  • Truth After Trump
  • How Political Science Gets Politics Wrong
  • Our ‘Prophet of Deceit’
  • The Carnival Campaign

Neither candidate is perfect, and neither inspires my students. However, this is the first election year where both Democratic and Republican students feel like a vote for the Republican presidential nominee is a vote for explicitly exclusionist politics and rhetoric. Which poses a dilemma for the educator: How does one teach fairly and dispassionately an election campaign in which one of the two candidates regularly spouts rhetoric and ideas that many consider offensive?

F or starters, one must cast today’s events in the context of a longer, continuing narrative. I remind my students that Trumpism and the millions of supporters who have rallied to its cause are not new to America or American politics.

Many students instinctively compare Trump to Hitler or Mussolini. However, many of Trump’s views actually have roots in American soil. His politics can be traced back to the likes of Gov. George Wallace and Sens. Jesse Helms and Strom Thurmond. They preached and practiced exclusionary politics based on race, religion, and nationality.

By historicizing the statements of Trump and the exclusionist beliefs of many of his supporters, the fervor for Trump begins to make more sense. Bringing Trump closer to late-20th-century politics, I remind students that Ronald Reagan declared his 1980 candidacy in Philadelphia, Miss. — the city where the civil-rights activists James Chaney, Andrew Goodman, and Michael Schwerner were murdered in 1964 — thus sounding a dog whistle to supporters about his beliefs on race, as well as law and order.

I also show the incredibly successful Willie Horton ad used against the Democratic nominee Michael Dukakis, then governor of Massachusetts, in the 1988 presidential campaign. The Horton commercial is in many ways the gold standard for a racialized attack ad in modern political elections.

I don’t use these examples solely to make the argument that Republicans in the past have employed racist campaign practices. Rather I use these examples to illustrate the long history of race and racism in the American electorate and the ways in which voters have responded to covert and overt racialized tactics in election cycles.

ADVERTISEMENT

I have the privilege of teaching at a Jesuit institution with both Democratic and Republican students. But whether you teach at a conservative-leaning large university in a “red state,” or a small liberal-arts college in a deep-blue one, we all share the fundamental experience as educators of trying to create a productive space for our students to think about current events as well as theoretical concepts. It is imperative to recognize that some students are truly frightened by not just Trump but his supporters as well. But it is still possible to create a safe space within the classroom to dissect why Trump’s message appeals to so many voters.

Trump’s speeches and loosely defined policy platforms have sparked robust discussions in my classroom — about race, class, gender, religion, immigration, the First Amendment, the limitations of a presidency, the elasticity of the Constitution, and the framers’ intentions. Many of my Republican students feel like they are without a party this election year — a perfect opportunity to explain party realignments in American political history. Without cosigning Trump’s rhetoric, we have used his words as the starting point to discuss issues and concepts that go beyond the man.

Make no mistake: It has been difficult to remain neutral, fair, and balanced when discussing a candidate who consistently insults large swaths of the American public, my racial and ethnic group included — in his words, “the blacks.” But painful as it has been at times, it is possible — indeed, it is necessary — to discuss why Donald Trump and his message resonate with so many Americans.

Christina M. Greer is an associate professor of political science at Fordham University and the author of Black Ethnics: Race, Immigration, and the Pursuit of the American Dream (Oxford University Press, 2013).

A version of this article appeared in the November 4, 2016, issue.
Read other items in The Election Issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Opinion
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

PPP 10 FINAL promo.jpg
Bouncing Back?
For Once, Public Confidence in Higher Ed Has Increased
University of California, Berkeley chancellor Dr. Rich Lyons, testifies at a Congressional hearing on antisemitism, in Washington, D.C., U.S., on July 15, 2025. It is the latest in a series of House hearings on antisemitism at the university level, one that critics claim is a convenient way for Republicans to punish universities they consider too liberal or progressive, thereby undermining responses to hate speech and hate crimes. (Photo by Allison Bailey/NurPhoto via AP)
Another Congressional Hearing
3 College Presidents Went to Congress. Here’s What They Talked About.
Tufts University student from Turkey, Rumeysa Ozturk, who was arrested by immigration agents while walking along a street in a Boston suburb, talks to reporters on arriving back in Boston, Saturday, May 10, 2025, a day after she was released from a Louisiana immigration detention center on the orders of a federal judge. (AP Photo/Rodrique Ngowi)
Law & Policy
Homeland Security Agents Detail Run-Up to High-Profile Arrests of Pro-Palestinian Scholars
Photo illustration of a donation jar turned on it's side, with coins spilling out.
Financial aid
The End of Unlimited Grad-School Loans Could Leave Some Colleges and Students in the Lurch

From The Review

Illustration of an ocean tide shaped like Donald Trump about to wash away sandcastles shaped like a college campus.
The Review | Essay
Why Universities Are So Powerless in Their Fight Against Trump
By Jason Owen-Smith
Photo-based illustration of a closeup of a pencil meshed with a circuit bosrd
The Review | Essay
How Are Students Really Using AI?
By Derek O'Connell
John T. Scopes as he stood before the judges stand and was sentenced, July 2025.
The Review | Essay
100 Years Ago, the Scopes Monkey Trial Discovered Academic Freedom
By John K. Wilson

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin