Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    Hands-On Career Preparation
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    Alternative Pathways
Sign In
Admissions

The Coalition for College’s New Leader Says ‘Success Is Not Just a Number’

By Eric Hoover February 4, 2020
Stacey Kostell, the new head of the Coalition for College
Stacey Kostell, the new head of the Coalition for CollegeCourtesy of the U. of Vermont

The Coalition for College on Tuesday announced that Stacey Kostell, vice president for enrollment management at the University of Vermont, will become the organization’s new chief executive officer in March.

The Coalition, a membership organization founded in 2015 to promote college access, runs a shared application platform used by 158 colleges. It was formerly known as the Coalition for Access, Affordability, and Success.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

The Coalition for College on Tuesday announced that Stacey Kostell, vice president for enrollment management at the University of Vermont, will become the organization’s new chief executive officer in March.

The Coalition, a membership organization founded in 2015 to promote college access, runs a shared application platform used by 158 colleges. It was formerly known as the Coalition for Access, Affordability, and Success.

Last week The Chronicle caught up with Kostell as she was preparing for her new job. She explained why she wanted to take the helm of a high-profile — and sometimes-controversial organization — that competes with the Common Application.

You were a first-generation college student. How does that shape the way you think about your work?

I grew up in a small town in Indiana, a rural student. I always knew that I would go to college, but I don’t think I applied until February of my senior year. I don’t remember anyone having a conversation with me about it. A couple of good friends who were going to Indiana State University came home and told me that I should apply there. That was my whole college search.

I had veteran’s benefits from my dad, who was a disabled vet. So I knew I could go to a public school. But my parents had very limited income, and because they had that waiver, they never applied for financial aid. So they got second jobs to help me pay for housing. Now I think, My God, I think we would’ve been Pell-eligible, especially when my brother went to college. Why didn’t anyone tell us to apply for financial aid?

So one lesson is that if you don’t have help applying to college, you don’t know what you’re missing.

Right. My family was able to make it work, but we were probably one paycheck away from me figuring out how I was going to pay for school myself. Had I done a college search or known about financial-aid options, I may have been better off financially for my family. That’s why, today, I really like making sure that families know that there are affordable options.

The Coalition’s stated mission was to help students, especially low-income and first-generation applicants, get to college. Describe its impact so far.

When the Coalition started, other organizations started paying more attention to access as well. That’s super-important. The more people who invest in making that a priority, the better it is for students. The Coalition really got people thinking meaningfully about what they were doing to provide access to their colleges.

ADVERTISEMENT

In August, members of the Coalition went down to Tennessee to do some rural travel. That kind of outreach isn’t about recruiting for our schools. It’s about connecting with students and counselors, learning how we can inform them better, asking what we can do to make education seem more possible, and letting them know that we can make college affordable.

Early on, the Coalition said it wanted to “recast” the admissions process. That hasn’t really happened, has it?

The mission of the Coalition, or what we saw in ourselves, was really not just an application, but a college-planning tool.

I would agree. But the mission of the Coalition, or what we saw in ourselves, was really not just an application, but a college-planning tool. That was the basis for talking about recasting the admissions process. It was a good opportunity for all of us to take a step back and ask, Is there anything in our process that might be an obstacle to students? Is there anything in our process that might not be equitable? This has helped us have more-intense conversations about that.

ADVERTISEMENT

Where has the Coalition fallen short? And what can you do about it?

Most of the criticism at the end of the day hasn’t been about the mission, which I think most people can buy into. It’s been about technology. Our goal was to do a student-centered application, which was very different from other applications. We also wanted to give the members flexibility. It’s different than saying, “If you want to be on this platform, here are the rules that you have to agree to.”

That can be more complicated to use from a counselor’s perspective. We’ve taken some feedback, made some changes. We’re still having conversations about how to make the application more user-friendly, more accessible to students and counselors.

We certainly want to make sure the application is workable and easy and not frustrating. But I also want to continue to work to improve our relationships with high-school counselors. That’s a critically important audience for us.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let’s pretend I just came down from Mars and asked you this: What can the Coalition app do for me that the Common Application can’t?

It really isn’t about the application itself. It’s about the college-planning tool. You can go on as a freshman or sophomore in high school, and start building out your plan for college. When you sign up, you get some really helpful information about college planning that’s general in nature. High schools do a lot of great work, but to hear information about the Coalition that’s taken from all its members, it’s a great college-planning email.

Right now, applicants can use the Coalition to apply to a limited number of institutions. How much might membership grow?

Our goal is moderate growth. There are still a number of institutions that meet the Coalition’s membership criteria that we hope will want to become members. It would be awesome to get the University of California system to join, because they are really accessible to so many students. What about the Dakotas? The University of Utah? The Coalition isn’t in those spaces yet. I would like to see us get there.

ADVERTISEMENT

As of late January, the Coalition’s application volume is down 19 percent compared with last year. Why is that?

The biggest change is that the University of Florida, which had been Coalition-exclusive, is now accepting the Common Application, too. It’s natural that some students are going to gravitate toward the Common App based on other schools they’re applying to. So there was an expectation that we would likely be down this year because Florida was such a heavy-volume school for us in the past.

We’re excited about the fact that we’re up in Texas (47 percent) and California (16 percent), and, most importantly, that we’re seeing a huge increase in transfer applications (160 percent). In enrollment management, you always want to be up in applications. I’m hoping that we will shift back up next year.

At Vermont, you introduced the Catamount Commitment Program, which waives tuition and fees for low-income state residents, provides them with a faculty mentor, and brings them together for monthly gatherings. Tell me about something you learned from that.

ADVERTISEMENT

I learned a lot from the students in the program about what they needed from the university. People who work at universities make a lot of assumptions about what we at universities do well or don’t do well. So it’s been great to have a 100-plus focus group of students to let us know, for example, that they thought it was so confusing to buy books. They said that we needed to tell them how to do that. And then we thought, Wow, we thought we were doing that so well. It was a reminder that we really need to listen to students.

How should people assess the progress of the Coalition going forward?

It’s easy to look at application volume, and say, Oh, it’s going well, or not going so well. But what we’ve really been focused on is, Who accounts for that application volume? For us, at Vermont, it’s asking if we have students using that application who are fee-waiver eligible, who are first-generation or underrepresented. That’s one of the ways that we’ll measure our success.

One of the other ways is finding out how many students are joining the platform early. Are we educating and communicating so that freshmen and sophomores in high school are actually getting on the platform and having an opportunity to learn about the college-selection process? Are member colleges able to reach out to those students to begin relationships to make sure they’ve prepared the best possible application?

ADVERTISEMENT

So success is not just a number. It’s seeing what the shape of our application pool is.

That makes sense. Still, why wouldn’t an organization founded in the name of access set some benchmarks for those access outcomes?

Just raising your hand and saying “I’m joining the Coalition” is not going to change things for an institution by itself. It’s part of a larger commitment. Our role as an organization is finding out what the goals of members are and how the Coalition can partner with them to get there.

The students coming from the Coalition are more diverse than our regular pool, and we think that’s helping us.

At Vermont, we don’t have a large number of Coalition apps, but I know the ones that we do have are from more-diverse group of students than the ones we receive from the Common Application. So it’s not just about the number. It’s about how the students coming from the Coalition are more diverse than our regular pool, and we think that’s helping us.

ADVERTISEMENT

Applicant pools are one thing. But access happens when a college accepts those applicants and provides funding that enables them to enroll. If in 10 years the Coalition is full of colleges that haven’t really increased their enrollment of the students it set out to serve, then what good would it be?

I completely hear what you’re saying. I think it’s hard for a member organization to put parameters around an institution’s mission, because what they’re trying to accomplish, or what kind of demographics they’re dealing with, that really varies.

Certainly we should think about how we are going to measure our long-term success as an organization other than looking at application volume and the students who apply. We should think about the students who actually enroll and how successful they are. It’s not just getting in, but getting through and getting out.

Hopefully, we can look back and say we’ve seen an increase in first-generation students, limited-income students, rural students. We all want to see that happen, but how to measure that will take some thinking.

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

A version of this article appeared in the February 14, 2020, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Admissions & Enrollment Innovation & Transformation First-Generation Students
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Eric Hoover
About the Author
Eric Hoover
Eric Hoover writes about the challenges of getting to, and through, college. Follow him on Twitter @erichoov, or email him, at eric.hoover@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Collage of charts
Data
How Faculty Pay and Tenure Can Change Depending on Academic Discipline
Vector illustration of two researcher's hands putting dollar signs into a beaker leaking green liquid.
'Life Support'
As the Nation’s Research-Funding Model Ruptures, Private Money Becomes a Band-Aid
Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through a flat black and white university building and a landscape bearing the image of a $100 bill.
Budget Troubles
‘Every Revenue Source Is at Risk’: Under Trump, Research Universities Are Cutting Back
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome topping a jar of money.
Budget Bill
Republicans’ Plan to Tax Higher Ed and Slash Funding Advances in Congress

From The Review

Photo-based illustration of the sculpture, The Thinker, interlaced with anotehr image of a robot posed as The Thinker with bits of binary code and red strips weaved in.
The Review | Essay
What I Learned Serving on My University’s AI Committee
By Megan Fritts
Illustration of a Gold Seal sticker embossed with President Trump's face
The Review | Essay
What Trump’s Accreditation Moves Get Right
By Samuel Negus
Illustration of a torn cold seal sticker embossed with President Trump's face
The Review | Essay
The Weaponization of Accreditation
By Greg D. Pillar, Laurie Shanderson

Upcoming Events

Ascendium_06-10-25_Plain.png
Views on College and Alternative Pathways
Coursera_06-17-25_Plain.png
AI and Microcredentials
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin