To the Editor:
Academic bullying is a more-complex subject than Piper Fogg’s “Academic Bullies” (The Chronicle Review, September 12) makes it seem. I wish her article had reflected the advances in scholarship reported at the 6th International Conference on Workplace Bullying in Montreal last June, where researchers from 30 countries shared their latest insights.
An up-to-date overview would not have had the title “Academic Bullies.” It would not have defined the problem as some number of pathological professors, the “bullies” or “bad apples.” It would have recognized that personalizing conflict by positing bad guys on one side and victims and good guys on the other rarely fits the facts and usually makes things worse. New York school psychologist and psychotherapist Israel Kalman has correctly pointed out that antibullying campaigns based on so simplistic a view are witch hunts and do more harm than good.
We’re sorry. Something went wrong.
We are unable to fully display the content of this page.
The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.
Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.
If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com