> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
The Review
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

The Complexity of Academic Bullying

October 10, 2008

To the Editor:

Academic bullying is a more-complex subject than Piper Fogg’s “Academic Bullies” (The Chronicle Review, September 12) makes it seem. I wish her article had reflected the advances in scholarship reported at the 6th International Conference on Workplace Bullying in Montreal last June, where researchers from 30 countries shared their latest insights.

An up-to-date overview would not have had the title “Academic Bullies.” It would not have defined the problem as some number of pathological professors, the “bullies” or “bad apples.” It would have recognized that personalizing conflict by positing bad guys on one side and victims and good guys on the other rarely fits the facts and usually makes things worse. New York school psychologist and psychotherapist Israel Kalman has correctly pointed out that antibullying campaigns based on so simplistic a view are witch hunts and do more harm than good.

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

To the Editor:

Academic bullying is a more-complex subject than Piper Fogg’s “Academic Bullies” (The Chronicle Review, September 12) makes it seem. I wish her article had reflected the advances in scholarship reported at the 6th International Conference on Workplace Bullying in Montreal last June, where researchers from 30 countries shared their latest insights.

An up-to-date overview would not have had the title “Academic Bullies.” It would not have defined the problem as some number of pathological professors, the “bullies” or “bad apples.” It would have recognized that personalizing conflict by positing bad guys on one side and victims and good guys on the other rarely fits the facts and usually makes things worse. New York school psychologist and psychotherapist Israel Kalman has correctly pointed out that antibullying campaigns based on so simplistic a view are witch hunts and do more harm than good.

Carlo Caponecchia and Anne Wyatt, from the University of New South Wales, called the talk they gave in Montreal “Victimising the ‘Bully': Problems with the ‘Workplace Psychopaths’ Approach.” Purdue University psychologist Kipling D. Williams described his experiments on the devastating effects of ostracism. Many other presenters at the conference were similarly critical of approaches to conflict that involve demonization of one or another of those involved.

The research literature on workplace mobbing, which John Gravois accurately summarized in “Mob Rule” (The Chronicle, April 14, 2006), can be seen as a corrective to the oversimplification apparent in Fogg’s article. Australian researcher Linda Shallcross, in her presentation in Montreal, described accusations of bullying as common and effective techniques for mobbing a targeted colleague.

ADVERTISEMENT

In keeping with the best research, the University of Waterloo’s human-resources department has adopted five basic principles for the university workplace. They are inscribed on a large sign posted in every department on campus. First on the list is, “Focus on the situation, issue, or behavior, not the person.” This principle is worth remembering whenever one is tempted to label a colleague or administrator a bully.

Kenneth Westhues Professor of Sociology University of Waterloo Waterloo, Ontario


http://chronicle.com Section: The Chronicle Review Volume 55, Issue 7, Page B23

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Opinion
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin