Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    Trump Webinar Series
    Mental Health Forum
    Using Big Data to Improve Social Mobility
Sign In
The Chronicle Review

The Digital Apocalypse Is Now

By J.C. Hallman September 21, 2015
The Digital Apocalypse Is Now 1
Alex Williamson for The Chronicle Review

To begin with a wild assertion: Our current glut of apocalypses — arriving via climate catastrophe or nuclear war or aliens or plague or zombies or vampires (I’m thinking of Emily St. John Mandel’s Station Eleven, Colson Whitehead’s Zone One, Cormac McCarthy’s The Road, not to mention films ranging from Independence Day to The Day After Tomorrow) — comes in response to the collective cravings of a global audience that has taken a good long look at the modern world and grumbled something along the lines of, “Oh, well, just screw it.”

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

To begin with a wild assertion: Our current glut of apocalypses — arriving via climate catastrophe or nuclear war or aliens or plague or zombies or vampires (I’m thinking of Emily St. John Mandel’s Station Eleven, Colson Whitehead’s Zone One, Cormac McCarthy’s The Road, not to mention films ranging from Independence Day to The Day After Tomorrow) — comes in response to the collective cravings of a global audience that has taken a good long look at the modern world and grumbled something along the lines of, “Oh, well, just screw it.”

Changing the Subject

By Sven Birkerts (Graywolf Press)

Armageddons entertain by affirming cynicism. If this is correct, then we would all do well, every once in a while, to remind ourselves that despite the litany of death-wish fantasies, the world is not actually ending. We’re not all about to be tossed back to the Pleistocene, and thus there’s something better to do with our reading lives than thrill at authors preoccupied with how it’s all going to end. Rather, we should carefully attend to those writers who accept that it’s going to go on whether we like it or not. Writers like Sven Birkerts.

An essayist and critic who runs the much-vaunted low-residency M.F.A. program at Bennington College, Birkerts is the author of the now 20-year-old The Gutenberg Elegies, a volume widely regarded as the most elegant articulation of the angst we all felt as the digital invasion began its assault on literature. As such, The Gutenberg Elegies, it must be admitted, is itself a kind of doomsday narrative. Now, Birkerts offers a follow-up, Changing the Subject, a finely wrought and well-titled companion volume that fears the same dreadful end, but tacks from literature to consciousness, knowledge, data, and information. This is an unlikely cast of characters for a doomsday narrative, to be sure, but nevertheless the book becomes a necessary guide for surviving the ongoing e-pocalypse.

Changing the Subject is about the digital invasion, yes, but the core of the problem is that we have transitioned from trafficking in information to trafficking in data. “Data without context are inert,” Birkerts writes, but data within contexts become information, knowledge. Anxiety over “the information age,” then, isn’t really about information, but contextless data points. For Birkerts, “the essential human premise of context” has been besieged, the result being that the “idea of authorship” is threatened. The ideals of the Enlightenment are at stake, and he wonders whether “the very sources of artistic imagination might not be endangered, depleted.”

In short: Inert data create inert people. Hence, AMC’s latest spinoff: The Texting Dead.

Birkerts frets not only over the fact that we’re staring beguiled at an approaching extinction-level-event meteor. No, he’s also flabbergasted at the “cyberinsiders” who have embraced the end-times siege, who have shinnied down the castle walls and can be glimpsed at a distance, loading boulders into the catapults. If that seems a bit histrionic, credit the surprising effects of Birkerts’s understated tone. He writes that he wants “to understand what it is that we are collectively doing as we embrace e-culture.” He wonders why we have accepted the shift “without any extended dialogue about whether there are trade-offs involved.”

He’s striving to remain calm, I think, because he realizes that he’s a sheriff confronting a lynch mob of cybersector techpreneurs desperate to lynch, well, themselves. You can’t six-shoot your way through a mob — you have to try to reason with them. And this mob, full of irrational cranks, is beyond reason. “The reader has to adjust to the author, not vice versa,” Birkerts pleads. Alas, that’s not going to go down well with zombie hordes dying to read about zombie hordes.

Birkerts might be said to have traveled this less trodden path once before. So you might be thinking that you can just read a review of Changing the Subject — this review, say — instead of reading the book. But what Birkerts writes about reading in general — that plots don’t matter, that to read is to be neuroplastically impressed by an “author’s language world” — establishes why Changing the Subject is a must-read. For a review can offer only a description of an approximation of an experience. Even worse, it can reduce a book to data.

To say, for example that Changing the Subject is a collection of essays that includes riffs on Jeopardy!, GPS devices, Seamus Heaney, literary envy, and the unexpected joys of stationary bicycles is to say something that is true — but it is also to be guilty of what the book warns against, reducing an experience to contextless data points.

To go the other way is a little better. To say, for example, that Birkerts sometimes strikes the tone of one of those billionaire conservationists with a population of endangered horses and zebras protected out on a ranch somewhere, but who watches the worldwide extinctions happening anyway, powerless despite his riches; or to say that Birkerts sometimes sounds like an old sailor too weary for a last voyage on a sparkling new ship, and so stands at the end of the pier, waving at the liner cruising into iceberg-infested waters — these are better. These are context. But Changing the Subject is really both, data in context, and a responsible reviewer can’t tell you anything more than this: The information and the experience they provide are both essential, and not easily represented by hasty approximations of either.

ADVERTISEMENT

Nor is it entirely fair to suggest that The Gutenberg Elegies and Changing the Subject are doomsday books, as I’ve been doing. For the latter, at least, includes a number of pieces not entirely absorbed with extended dialogues about apocalyptic trade-offs. When Birkerts writes, of Shirley Hazzard’s The Transit of Venus, that he was reminded anew of “how much pressure artistic language, held in a narrative shape, could exert on consciousness,” we heave a sigh of relief as our own consciousness settles into the warm bath of elegant praise. When he claims that when the illusion of books “is felt strongly enough, at full intensity, it trumps the sensations of living,” we rejoice with an intense recognition that confirms that very claim. Ditto when Birkerts describes mind-melding his way into the works of Joseph O’Neill and Roberto Bolaño. It’s in these moments that he affirms for us, all evidence aside, that the world will go on, survive. Hence, the true subject of Changing the Subject is hope, a hope that spites all those cynics pining for Judgment Day.

If you’re already a data-fied zombie, pass this book by. You’ve got better things to do, infection to spread, brains to eat. But if you’ve got a pulse, then find this book and immerse yourself in it. It will remind you that other souls remain, scattered thin through the waste.

J.C. Hallman is a visiting professor of creative writing at Colby College and the author, most recently, of B & Me: A True Story of Literary Arousal (Simon & Schuster).

A version of this article appeared in the September 25, 2015, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Opinion
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Illustration showing nontraditional students: a pregnant worman, a soldier; a working professional; an elderly man; and a woman with an artificial leg
'Unique Needs'
Common App Takes an In-Depth Look at Independent Students
Photo-based illustration of a Sonoma State University clock structure that's fallen into a hole in a $100 bill.
Campus Crossroads
Sonoma State U. Is Making Big Cuts to Close a Budget Hole. What Will Be Left?
Illustration showing three classical columns on stacks of coins, at different heights due to the amount of coins stacked underneath
Data
These 32 Colleges Could Take a Financial Hit Under Republicans’ Expanded Endowment Tax
Conti-0127
Finance
Here’s What Republicans’ Proposed College-Endowment Tax Could Look Like

From The Review

Illustration depicting a pendulum with a red ball featuring a portion of President Trump's face to the left about to strike balls showing a group of protesters.
The Review | Opinion
Trump Is Destroying DEI With the Same Tools That Built It
By Noliwe M. Rooks
Illustration showing two men and giant books, split into two sides—one blue and one red. The two men are reaching across the center color devide to shake hands.
The Review | Opinion
Left and Right Agree: Higher Ed Needs to Change
By Michael W. Clune
University of British Columbia president and vice-chancellor Santa Ono pauses while speaking during a memorandum of understanding  signing ceremony between the Tsilhqot'in National Government and UBC, in Vancouver, British Columbia, on Dec. 8, 2021.
The Review | Opinion
Santa Ono Flees for Florida
By Silke-Maria Weineck

Upcoming Events

Plain_USF_AIWorkForce_VF.png
New Academic Programs for an AI-Driven Work Force
Cincy_Plain.png
Hands-On Career Preparation
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin