Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
Advice

The Gender Politics of Doctoral Reform

By Leonard Cassuto January 23, 2020
The Graduate Advisor Diplomas
Kevin Van Aelst for The Chronicle

Round numbers and new decades invite us to take stock of things. The last decade was a big one for career diversity and doctoral reform in academe. The organizers of the Modern Language Association and other professional organizations are clearly “woke” to the

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Round numbers and new decades invite us to take stock of things. The last decade was a big one for career diversity and doctoral reform in academe. The organizers of the Modern Language Association and other professional organizations are clearly “woke” to the need for changes in graduate education.


But what about the membership? At this year’s MLA convention in Seattle, I decided to look more closely at the audiences that show up to listen, and have their say, at sessions about doctoral reform.

The Graduate Adviser - package Promo
The Graduate Adviser
In this monthly column, Leonard Cassuto explores the ins and outs of doctoral training, with advice for both graduate students and their faculty mentors.
  • Why We Need a Yelp for Doctoral Programs
  • Anatomy of a Polite Revolt in Columbia’s English Department
  • 6 Tips to Improve Your Cover Letter
  • 8 Tips to Improve Your CV


Those sessions have been plentiful in recent years. This year, they included discussions of the larger conditions governing the constricted tenure-track market — the demographics, the contingent status of full-time, non-tenure-track teaching jobs, and the “ethics of pedagogy” (“what we owe to our students”). There were also the now-expected workshops offering advice to graduate students on managing the academic job market and exploring nonfaculty career paths. Job candidates could go to separate workshops on CV- and résumé-writing. Another workshop — focused on job searches “inside and outside the academy” — invited participants to move from table to table, talking with Ph.D.s employed in a mix of professions.


Who is attending all of those sessions on doctoral training, job searching, and career diversity?


Based on what I witnessed at this year’s convention: lots and lots of women and very few men, especially white men. The ratio isn’t a random blip, either — I’ve noticed it for years. So why do the demographics of doctoral reform skew female, and what might that mean?


We can start with the numbers. “The profession as a whole is more female now,” said Jean Howard, a professor of English at Columbia University, in an interview via email. That is notably true of many other humanities fields, too.


The numbers on the biological clock demand attention, too. Many women in academe postpone having children until after they have earned tenure. But as the road to a stable academic career gets ever longer, women may be more inclined to look for a suitable exit ramp that leads to a more family-friendly life.


But there’s more to this pattern than sheer numbers. I’ve spoken to multidisciplinary audiences at campuses around the country, and I see the same proportions, not just in the humanities.


The nature of a job affects who chooses to do it — and so does the perception of the job. “The work of reform” is “sometimes feminized,” wrote Katina Rogers, a director of programs and administration involving graduate training at the City University of New York Graduate Center, in an email. It involves “a lot of care and maintenance and collective effort.”


The keyword: care. Many of the changes in graduate education entail more care for the students. That’s both appropriate and overdue — graduate students’ welfare has been ignored for too long while we all hunkered down and waited for literally decades for the academic job market to return to its brief postwar heyday.


Today, only the most Panglossian professors maintain that futile vigil. Most others are trying to come to grips with a New Normal for ourselves and our students. But new models of graduate education that prepare students for diverse career paths (not just for the professoriate) necessarily require more advising. Dissertation advisers can’t just rely on the old template. We need to have wider conversations with our advisees about their career options, involving experts from other areas, like career services.


For about 100 years now, faculty members have been socialized to think of their jobs as a triadic combination of research, teaching, and service. As a form of teaching, graduate advising has an intellectual component — scholarly training — that allies it with research. But the caretaking, career-preparatory part of advising leans more toward service.

ADVERTISEMENT


Nicky Agate, the assistant director of scholarly communication at Columbia University, spoke on an MLA panel on “Disrupting the Academic Prestige Economy.” She noticed that the whole panel was female — as was 80 percent of the audience — and wondered about how to get more male professors interested in training their graduate students for multiple career paths. Why won’t they? They’re worried, said Agate, that they “won’t be able to produce mini-me’s anymore.”

Service has traditionally been the least-prestigious, least-respected member of the research-teaching-service triad. Not coincidentally, service also has a long and continuing history of being feminized. Service is seen as soft, lacking in intellectual heft and rigor, and unworthy of the rewards reaped by research. Michelle A. Massé, a professor of English at Louisiana State University and co-editor of Over Ten Million Served: Gendered Service in Language and Literature Workplaces, called service “the handmaid to both teaching and research.”


Improving graduate advising is central to doctoral-education reforms. But the more those changes emphasize advising, the more feminized that movement becomes. Is it any wonder that men stay away when we gather to talk about how to improve Ph.D. training and career options?


But not all men avoid those conversations. There are some men who show up to talk about changes in doctoral education — and most of them are nonwhite.

ADVERTISEMENT


Amardeep Singh, a professor of English at Lehigh University, is one of them. As the current director of graduate studies of his department, he bore witness to the “disproportionate amount of the heavy lifting” that women do when it comes to administration of academic departments.


“The reluctance I’ve encountered from some male colleagues,” he said, “runs along the lines of, ‘It’s fine that you want to help our graduate students get jobs, but I have serious books to write.’” Singh decided to serve as graduate-studies director because “We can’t just feed our students to the wolves.”


The combination of women and nonwhite men make up a natural reform constituency. “Minority men still see themselves as new to the game,” said Howard. “They naturally ally with women and see themselves as, like women, subordinate for a long time to white men.” There’s a practical aspect to this, adds Rogers: “The people who are most invested in reform are often those who have historically not been well served by the existing system.”


They’re also more attuned to the alternatives. “We know enough to look outside the usual networks because we’re often excluded from those networks to begin with,” said Megan Ferry, professor of Chinese and Asian studies and chair of the modern-languages and literatures department at Union College, who led a career-diversity workshop at MLA. “We’re more open to the possibility that there’s no set path for us.”

ADVERTISEMENT


Women and nonwhite men both gain from a more diverse system — and so does everyone else. Hiring committees have already gotten that memo. There are very few professorships out there, but “both women and men of color are the ones getting the jobs now,” said Howard.


Which raises a paradox. The same white men who avoid sessions on doctoral-education reform and nonacademic careers actually need them the most.


It’s no secret that the language and literature fields under the MLA aegis produce a more diverse pool of candidates than many other disciplines. Moreover, the faculty members in those departments generally encourage efforts to hire candidates from underrepresented groups.


“The academic job market isn’t sparing anyone these days,” said Stacy M. Hartman, director of the Publics Lab at the CUNY Graduate Center, in an email. But as Howard points out, white men “objectively” face “a disadvantage” in faculty hiring these days, as literature and language departments not only look to hire diverse candidates but also to create tenure-track jobs in nonwhite, non-Western literary subfields.

ADVERTISEMENT


So why don’t more white male graduate students and Ph.D.’s show up at these graduate-career sessions and prepare themselves more broadly?


“Old habits of mind fade away very slowly,” said Howard, and “asking for help isn’t in their tool kit.” Perhaps white men “just don’t see themselves as benefiting from these workshops,” she said, adding that there remains “plenty of room to learn how to present oneself to best advantage.” But you have to want to do that.

That imperative applies to doctoral training as a whole. “Anyone who is concerned about the future of the humanities and the academy should be participating in these conversations” about reform, said Hartman. The women and nonwhite men who populate them now are keeping themselves open to possibility. That makes them role models for the rest of us.

Read other items in The Graduate Adviser.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
cassuto_leonard.jpg
About the Author
Leonard Cassuto
Leonard Cassuto is a professor of English at Fordham University who writes regularly for The Chronicle about graduate education. His newest book is Academic Writing as if Readers Matter, from Princeton University Press. He co-wrote, with Robert Weisbuch, The New Ph.D.: How to Build a Better Graduate Education. He welcomes comments and suggestions at cassuto@fordham.edu. Find him on X @LCassuto.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Vector illustration of large open scissors  with several workers in seats dangling by white lines
Iced Out
The Death of Shared Governance
Illustration showing money being funnelled into the top of a microscope.
'A New Era'
Higher-Ed Associations Pitch an Alternative to Trump’s Cap on Research Funding
Illustration showing classical columns of various heights, each turning into a stack of coins
Endowment funds
The Nation’s Wealthiest Small Colleges Just Won a Big Tax Exemption
WASHINGTON, DISTICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES - 2025/04/14: A Pro-Palestinian demonstrator holding a sign with Release Mahmud Khalil written on it, stands in front of the ICE building while joining in a protest. Pro-Palestinian demonstrators rally in front of the ICE building, demanding freedom for Mahmoud Khalil and all those targeted for speaking out against genocide in Palestine. Protesters demand an end to U.S. complicity and solidarity with the resistance in Gaza. (Photo by Probal Rashid/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Campus Activism
An Anonymous Group’s List of Purported Critics of Israel Helped Steer a U.S. Crackdown on Student Activists

From The Review

Illustration of an ocean tide shaped like Donald Trump about to wash away sandcastles shaped like a college campus.
The Review | Essay
Why Universities Are So Powerless in Their Fight Against Trump
By Jason Owen-Smith
Photo-based illustration of a closeup of a pencil meshed with a circuit bosrd
The Review | Essay
How Are Students Really Using AI?
By Derek O'Connell
John T. Scopes as he stood before the judges stand and was sentenced, July 2025.
The Review | Essay
100 Years Ago, the Scopes Monkey Trial Discovered Academic Freedom
By John K. Wilson

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin