Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    Hands-On Career Preparation
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    Alternative Pathways
Sign In
The Review

The Intellectual as President

By Kevin Mattson September 25, 2016
The Intellectual as President 1
Pete Souza, White House

I belong to a small group. Overeducated and often underemployed, we read small magazines and argue politics, and we try to elevate those conversations with forays into literature, history, and philosophy. We are the dreaded I-word — “intellectuals.” Rarely do we matter in public life. But back in 2008, it’s safe to say that Barack Obama seemed like one of us.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

I belong to a small group. Overeducated and often underemployed, we read small magazines and argue politics, and we try to elevate those conversations with forays into literature, history, and philosophy. We are the dreaded I-word — “intellectuals.” Rarely do we matter in public life. But back in 2008, it’s safe to say that Barack Obama seemed like one of us.

His biography screamed “intellectual.” Consider his liberal-arts education at Occidental College, then at Columbia University. He could parse Democracy in America, cite morally-complex fare like T.S. Eliot’s poetry, and chat about All the King’s Men. When he embarked on community organizing, he framed activism in big questions of democracy. Before becoming a politician, Obama was a writer — not just Dreams From My Father, but numerous journalistic pieces. Most of us recognized his wit but also a finely tuned mind that could see both sides of a given issue. Some credited his law-school training — from Harvard, no less — but I think it was his willingness to be playful about ideas.

Obama cover2
The Obama Issue
In this special issue of The Chronicle Review, we turn our attention to the accomplishments and disappointments of the past eight years. See the whole issue here.
  • How Obama Sees America
  • The First Feminist President
  • Dinners With the President

Remembering Obama in 2008 drove me to reread Norman Mailer’s classic 1960 essay about JFK, “Superman Comes to the Supermarket.” Hopped up on his own brand of existentialism (and perhaps pot), Mailer saw in Kennedy a political hero who could combat the mass culture of the “supermarket, that homogeneous extension of stainless surfaces,” and the doddering Eisenhower. Mailer cited Kennedy’s “cool grace” and political intelligence and was delighted that the future president had read his books (or at least named some). Mailer believed a hipster — his own exalted ideal — was about to enter the White House.

Mailer’s essay suffered its faults, but it still resonated when I thought back to the Obama of 2008. For I remember something my millennial students do not: just how “hot” politics became under George W. Bush. Consider the blunder in Iraq. The choice of war always felt predetermined, rushed, heated. And the man leading the initiative appeared uncurious. His malapropisms symbolized a scrambled brain. He admitted not reading books and called himself “the decider.” His was the quintessential anti-intellectual presidency, and Obama’s politics of cool intelligence could, perhaps, defuse it.

Any presidency — but especially one whose campaign boasted slogans like “Yes, We Can” — will be a letdown. Mailer felt the same of JFK — the disastrous Bay of Pigs and the caving to militaristic advisers, the failure to act on civil rights, the championing of corporate tax cuts. For many on the left, the promise of Candidate Obama gave way to the compromise of President Obama. Consider the jeremiads of Thomas Frank, Chris Hedges, and the perpetually cranky Cornel West. Choose your disappointment: the weaknesses of Obamacare, the inability to shut down Guantánamo, the inaction on mounting poverty, the deference toward Wall Street.

Then there was his approach toward higher education. Throughout his presidency, Obama has viewed a college education simply in vocational terms. You see that in his College Scorecard (which assumes that level of pay after graduation is a sufficient measure of an education’s worth). And there was his nasty dig at “art history” majors, when he laid out a job-training proposal in Wisconsin two years ago. Some of us wanted to scream: What about the inherent worth of knowledge — the internal virtues of learning — that the president should be defending? Remember Occidental?

We are the dreaded I-word — “intellectuals.” Back in 2008, it’s safe to say that Barack Obama seemed like one of us.
So does it matter that an intellectual has occupied the White House for the past eight years? Asking this question brings us to our Mailer problem. Mailer hoped for heroism in politics, believing that the choice of Kennedy would transform “the imagination of the American.” After Vietnam, Watergate, and Iraq, few of us look to politics for heroism or grandiose transformation; in fact, we rightfully distrust such romanticism. Obama’s own reading of Reinhold Niebuhr provided him with a sense of realism, an understanding that we all work within limits (including, for him, a recalcitrant opposition party). Having a gift for the playfulness of ideas can’t change that reality. And yet, on occasion these last few years, you could enjoy the glimmers of a president thinking, like when Obama discussed his summer reading materials, gave deliberative answers to journalists at press conferences, or cracked witty jokes at press-corps dinners (the historian Richard Hofstadter once wrote, “Wit is humor intellectualized”).

Admittedly, those examples seem small. And they lacked the strong contrast that Obama first presented in 2008, when his leadership style played well against the Bush era that my millennial students have forgotten about.

Which is why maybe now we really can see the importance of Obama’s intellectual, hip, and cool leadership. The contrast of 2016 is, of course, with Donald Trump. As the song goes, You don’t know what you got till it’s gone. Trump is clearly the anti-Obama candidate, in all sorts of ways but especially in terms of style. Trump is George W. Bush on steroids, bellicose and impulsive, with very little deliberative feel to his pronouncements (more and more of which he has to walk back clumsily). He reminds me of the hotness of the Bush years, with all its bluster and fury. In contrast, Obama looks like both a man about to leave the White House and someone capable of holding onto the principles of complexity and the capacity to understand ideas. Obama didn’t transform America by being a man of ideas; no one could do that. But he does remind us that intelligence and politics don’t have to be seen always as opposites.

A version of this article appeared in the September 30, 2016, issue.
Read other items in The Obama Issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

Obama’s Legacy: An Unlikely Hawk on Higher Ed</br>

More News

Graphic vector illustration of a ship with education-like embellishments being tossed on a black sea with a Kraken-esque elephant trunk ascending from the depth against a stormy red background.
Creeping concerns
Most Colleges Aren’t a Target of Trump (Yet). Here’s How Their Presidents Are Leading.
Photo-based illustration of calendars on a wall (July, August and September) with a red line marking through most of the dates
'A Creative Solution'
Facing Federal Uncertainty, Swarthmore Makes a Novel Plan: the 3-Month Budget
Marva Johnson is set to take the helm of Florida A&amp;M University this summer.
Leadership & governance
‘Surprising': A DeSantis-Backed Lobbyist Is Tapped to Lead Florida A&M
Students and community members protest outside of Coffman Memorial Union at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis, on Tuesday, April 23, 2024.
Campus Activism
One Year After the Encampments, Campuses Are Quieter and Quicker to Stop Protests

From The Review

Glenn Loury in Providence, R.I. on May 7, 2024.
The Review | Conversation
Glenn Loury on the ‘Barbarians at the Gates’
By Evan Goldstein, Len Gutkin
Illustration showing a valedictorian speaker who's tassel is a vintage microphone
The Review | Opinion
A Graduation Speaker Gets Canceled
By Corey Robin
Illustration showing a stack of coins and a university building falling over
The Review | Opinion
Here’s What Congress’s Endowment-Tax Plan Might Cost Your College
By Phillip Levine

Upcoming Events

Ascendium_06-10-25_Plain.png
Views on College and Alternative Pathways
Coursera_06-17-25_Plain.png
AI and Microcredentials
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin