Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    Hands-On Career Preparation
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    Alternative Pathways
Sign In
Advice

The Midsemester Course Correction

By David Gooblar October 31, 2017
Teaching Flexibility

Sometimes I think the most important quality any teacher can have is flexibility — the capacity to adjust quickly to whatever is happening in the classroom. The more flexible you can be about course design and approach, the more authority your students can take in shaping those aspects, and the more likely they will take responsibility for their own learning.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Sometimes I think the most important quality any teacher can have is flexibility — the capacity to adjust quickly to whatever is happening in the classroom. The more flexible you can be about course design and approach, the more authority your students can take in shaping those aspects, and the more likely they will take responsibility for their own learning.

To put it another way: All the preparation in the world won’t help if you turn up for class on the first day and discover your students aren’t nearly as skilled as you thought they would be. What’s required then is the ability and willingness to change your lesson plans to suit the students you have in the room, rather than the students you wish you had.

As the semester goes on, faculty members must continually adjust to all the ways that teaching in a real classroom manages to diverge from our plans — when an activity takes much longer than expected, when students don’t understand a concept we find straightforward, or when half the class is sailing through while the other half is struggling to keep up. As I wrote last month, flexibility is also at the heart of making sure your courses are accessible to all students. Rigidity keeps us from giving every student — no matter their limitations — a chance to succeed.

09242014-Pedagogy
Pedagogy Unbound
Looking for inspiration on teaching or some specific strategies? David Gooblar, a former lecturer in rhetoric at the University of Iowa who is now associate director of Temple University’s Center for the Advancement of Teaching, writes about classroom issues in these pages. Here is a sampling of his recent columns.
  • We Know What Works to Close the Completion Gap
  • What Elizabeth Warren Can Teach Us About Teaching
  • 3 Questions That Can Improve Your Teaching
  • What Is ‘Indoctrination’? And How Do We Avoid It in Class?

There’s a growing consensus in psychology that flexibility — sometimes figured as “emotion regulation” or “adaptive strategies” — is a key feature of psychological health. Being able to adapt as situations change, manage mental resources, and balance competing desires and needs is essential for navigating a complex and unpredictable world. What’s more, psychological inflexibility — often described as rigidity or a lack of sensitivity to context — is associated with a number of common mental illnesses: depression, anxiety disorders, and schizophrenia, among others. Think about the phrase “well-adjusted.” To be a psychologically healthy person is to be able to successfully adjust to conditions outside of your control.

As it is in psychology, so it is in pedagogy. There’s very little benefit to rigidly adhering to your initial conceptions of a course. Particularly now, as you enter the second half of the fall semester, being able to take stock, to pay attention to how your courses have diverged from your initial plans, and to adjust accordingly is a hugely valuable skill. Do the plans you made still make sense? Although it’s later than you think, it’s not too late to adjust the trajectory of your course based on what you’ve learned so far.

And you’ve learned a lot. For one, your students are not the theoretical beings they were when you were first sketching out your syllabus. You’ve gotten to know them, if not individually, then as a group. What kind of a group are they? How have they responded to the course so far? What approaches have worked well, and which ones have been like pulling teeth? You should have a decent sense of your students’ various strengths and limitations, what they are good at and what they still struggle with. All of this is useful information going forward.

Ideally, the flexible instructor is always paying attention to student feedback and making little adjustments as new information comes in. Try using students’ work as a source of information for on-the-fly planning, just to make sure you’re not stubbornly following a map to a country that no longer exists. The in-class work and assignments they’ve completed can give you valuable data about their capabilities and shortcomings. As you look over their submitted work, look for patterns — repeated errors, difficulties, and misconceptions — that can guide your teaching in the weeks to come. This is a process best done after you have graded some of their work. First, you evaluate how students did, and then you assess the results to determine what students need.

Whether or not you’ve made course adjustments so far, the midpoint of the semester is a great time to explicitly ask your students for their views.

A rigid adherence to a calendar you planned out in August is in nobody’s interest. Certainly there may be elements of your syllabus that you can’t change halfway through the semester, but you don’t need to feel completely handcuffed by your initial plans.

Three years ago, I wrote about Peter Filene’s unique approach to the midterm course evaluation, and I still use his exercise in my courses today. I hand out index cards and ask the class to fill them out anonymously. On one side, students describe something that has worked well in the course so far — something that has been valuable to them. On the other side, they write about something that hasn’t worked well, an aspect of the course that they think should change in the semester’s second half. I collect the cards, shuffle them, and redistribute them at random. Now that everyone has someone else’s card, I can feel free to ask students to read them aloud. It’s a way to start a conversation about how the course has been going without putting anyone on the spot. You get to hear your students’ honest opinions, and you signal to them that you care about their views. Even if you don’t drastically alter things going forward, the exercise shows students that it is their course, too, and that they have a hand in how things will proceed.

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s also worth engaging in some self-reflection and reassessment. Now is the time to look back on what you planned for the semester and decide whether or not to stick to those plans. Take a look at your syllabus — in particular the goals you sketched for the course. How much progress have you made? Are you heading in the right direction? Remind yourself of your destination and turn the steering wheel accordingly.

A rigid adherence to a calendar you planned out in August is in nobody’s interest. Certainly there may be elements of your syllabus that you can’t change halfway through the semester, but you don’t need to feel completely handcuffed by your initial plans.

In a rhetoric course I’m teaching this fall, the biggest changes I’ve been making have to do with the number of readings on the schedule. Readings take valuable class time to unpack and discuss, and I’ve started to worry that we don’t have enough time for the practice of skills my students need. Particularly in light of their first papers, which showed that many of my students need help with constructing effective sentences and paragraphs, I decided to thin the calendar a bit.

In the psychotherapeutic approach known as acceptance and commitment therapy, therapists help patients identify their central personal goals, and then coach those patients to be flexible in the face of changing conditions as they pursue those goals. To cultivate pedagogical flexibility, we need to let our goals for our students guide us, even as we adjust our methods when things don’t go as planned.

ADVERTISEMENT

As any experienced instructor will tell you, students have a way of showing us — clearly — when a teaching technique does not work. When that happens, all we have to do is pay attention, and adjust accordingly.

David Gooblar is a lecturer in the rhetoric department at the University of Iowa. He writes a column on teaching for The Chronicle and runs Pedagogy Unbound, a website for college instructors who share teaching strategies. To find more advice on teaching, browse his previous columns here.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
David Gooblar
David Gooblar is an assistant professor of English and of gender, women’s, and sexuality studies at the University of Iowa. He was previously associate director of Temple University’s Center for the Advancement of Teaching. His most recent book, The Missing Course: Everything They Never Taught You About College Teaching, was published by Harvard University Press in 2019. To find more advice on teaching, browse his previous columns here.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through a flat black and white university building and a landscape bearing the image of a $100 bill.
Budget Troubles
‘Every Revenue Source Is at Risk’: Under Trump, Research Universities Are Cutting Back
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome topping a jar of money.
Budget Bill
Republicans’ Plan to Tax Higher Ed and Slash Funding Advances in Congress
Allison Pingree, a Cambridge, Mass. resident, joined hundreds at an April 12 rally urging Harvard to resist President Trump's influence on the institution.
International
Trump Administration Revokes Harvard’s Ability to Enroll International Students
Photo-based illustration of an open book with binary code instead of narrative paragraphs
Culture Shift
The Reading Struggle Meets AI

From The Review

Illustration of a Gold Seal sticker embossed with President Trump's face
The Review | Essay
What Trump’s Accreditation Moves Get Right
By Samuel Negus
Illustration of a torn cold seal sticker embossed with President Trump's face
The Review | Essay
The Weaponization of Accreditation
By Greg D. Pillar, Laurie Shanderson
Protestors gather outside the Pro-Palestinian encampment on the campus of UCLA in Los Angeles on Wednesday, May 1, 2024.
The Review | Conversation
Are Colleges Rife With Antisemitism? If So, What Should Be Done?
By Evan Goldstein, Len Gutkin

Upcoming Events

Ascendium_06-10-25_Plain.png
Views on College and Alternative Pathways
Coursera_06-17-25_Plain.png
AI and Microcredentials
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin