Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    A Culture of Cybersecurity
    Opportunities in the Hard Sciences
    Career Preparation
Sign In
Backgrounder

The New Gun-Violence Scholars

By Emma Pettit August 22, 2016
Cassandra Crifasi, an assistant professor and injury epidemiologist at the Johns Hopkins U., says she and her colleagues who study firearm violence and policy are always concerned about extremists who might know about their work. She is “very thoughtful” about what she puts online.
Cassandra Crifasi, an assistant professor and injury epidemiologist at the Johns Hopkins U., says she and her colleagues who study firearm violence and policy are always concerned about extremists who might know about their work. She is “very thoughtful” about what she puts online. Courtesy of Cassandra Crifasi

With the exception of one sick day and some visits with his father, Garen J. Wintemute has woken up at 6 a.m., exercised, and gone into work seven days a week for the past three years.

In the eyes of many admirers, that daily discipline demonstrates what it takes to succeed in a demanding and lonely field. Dr. Wintemute, an emergency-room doctor, has dedicated his career to studying gun violence, as the director of the Violence Prevention Research Program at the University of California at Davis Health System.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Cassandra Crifasi, an assistant professor and injury epidemiologist at the Johns Hopkins U., says she and her colleagues who study firearm violence and policy are always concerned about extremists who might know about their work. She is “very thoughtful” about what she puts online.
Cassandra Crifasi, an assistant professor and injury epidemiologist at the Johns Hopkins U., says she and her colleagues who study firearm violence and policy are always concerned about extremists who might know about their work. She is “very thoughtful” about what she puts online. Courtesy of Cassandra Crifasi

With the exception of one sick day and some visits with his father, Garen J. Wintemute has woken up at 6 a.m., exercised, and gone into work seven days a week for the past three years.

In the eyes of many admirers, that daily discipline demonstrates what it takes to succeed in a demanding and lonely field. Dr. Wintemute, an emergency-room doctor, has dedicated his career to studying gun violence, as the director of the Violence Prevention Research Program at the University of California at Davis Health System.

When he started, 35 years ago, there was almost nobody — and no money — in his line of research.But that has begun to change. A recent succession of mass shootings and a string of killings of unarmed black men by the police have ignited new fervor in the field, Dr. Wintemute said. People talk about the need for research into gun violence in ways they never have before, he said, because they are beginning to see themselves in the victims.

“It’s violence they can’t write themselves out of,” Dr. Wintemute said.

At long last, he can see a growing group of young colleagues — scholars finally able to take on the study of guns, gun policy, and its effects.

The new crop of gun-violence researchers might be less isolated than Dr. Wintemute, who has remained dedicated to his field despite the absence of federal funding since 1997. But they’re still aware that they have chosen a difficult, possibly life-changing career path. They must still navigate an uncertain funding landscape. And they must do so while dealing with the stress that comes with studying a subject embroiled in a very public, and very controversial, national debate.

Scholars in the Public Eye

Academics who study gun violence and gun policy occupy an unusual position in public discourse. Few other topics provoke such extreme responses from advocates on both sides of the conversation. That takes getting used to.

Debates ignited by high-profile shootings can sound like echo chambers of feeling instead of fact, said Cassandra Crifasi, an assistant professor and injury epidemiologist at the Johns Hopkins University. As a doctoral student, she had no desire to do anything related to guns or gun violence because discussions about the topic struck her as so hyperbolic.

“Nobody could have a nice, normal conversation that seemed rational,” Ms. Crifasi said.

ADVERTISEMENT

But eventually she realized that she could add a valuable voice to the field. Ms. Crifasi was raised in a household with guns, and she hunted pheasants and sage grouse as a college student. She and her husband now own firearms and enjoy visiting a family farm to practice target shooting at soda cans.

The public discourse ultimately did not deter her from the field. But that attention, and the slim possibility of unhinged reactions from extremists, are still things Ms. Crifasi thinks about. She’s had conversations with her husband about the outspoken people who might be reading her work, and she is “very thoughtful” about what she puts online.

Shani Buggs, a graduate research assistant at the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Policy and Research, says the seemingly constant stream of national gun violence is her motivation to keep going.
Shani Buggs, a graduate research assistant at the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Policy and Research, says the seemingly constant stream of national gun violence is her motivation to keep going.Courtesy Shani Buggs

Backlash and threats were not things that Shani Buggs, a graduate research assistant at the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Policy and Research, expected when she enrolled in a doctoral program in the department of health policy and management. When she first started, the year after the fatal shooting of 20 schoolchildren and six teachers at Sandy Hook Elementary School, in Connecticut, she remembers hearing discussions at the center about safety precautions for handling the mail they received.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I remember thinking, ‘Whoa, this wasn’t communicated as part of the deal,’” Ms. Buggs said.

Stephen P. Teret, founding director of the center, has studied firearm violence for the better part of four decades. You never get fully accustomed to the threats and outrage, he says, but after a while “they’re not as novel as they were in the beginning.”

However, there are some that stand out. Mr. Teret once received a threatening letter in the mail that was streaked with multicolored highlighter and made no coherent point. He contacted the police; they found the writer, who lived out of state, and told him to stop such mailings.

A few years later, Mr. Teret was scheduled to speak at a conference in the same state in which that man lived. On a hunch, he checked the guest list. The man had signed up to attend. Mr. Teret asked the conference hosts to add a police presence.

ADVERTISEMENT

During Mr. Teret’s talk, the man stood and started yelling at him and then reached down toward a metal briefcase propped against his feet. Suddenly Mr. Teret was swarmed by police officers. In seconds, they encircled him and shuffled him across the stage, out the door, and into the back of a police car. He caught a flight home that night.

Mr. Teret said he can recall every detail of that day. He still keeps the letter in his office desk. But he never considered leaving his line of research because of incidents like that. Most public-health scholars would feel that same commitment, he said. They’re a stubborn bunch.

“It would be a terrible thing if you let something like that prevent you from doing your work,” Mr. Teret said. “You’ve lost.”

Playing the Long Game

Mr. Teret does not mention death threats to students considering a career in his field because such threats are relatively rare. What he does prepare students for is the more common, but painful, emotional toll of engaging with violence on a daily basis.

ADVERTISEMENT

As a gun-violence researcher, you become “a repository for some of the world’s saddest stories,” Mr. Teret said. Acquaintances and strangers contact you to talk about the horrible shooting that happened in their town, in their neighborhood, in their home.

“You carry those stories around with you, and that’s a very substantial weight,” Mr. Teret said. “And it does damage to you.”

One story has weighed on his mind the most over the years. A family friend’s 2-year-old son was killed when he was accidentally shot by a 4-year-old at a private day care. That death prompted Mr. Teret to study the impact of childproof guns for the next three decades.

Mr. Teret said he mentions this aspect of the profession to students and young colleagues because he believes he should get their “informed consent” before they enter the field.

ADVERTISEMENT

Like Mr. Teret, Ms. Buggs said her mentors were honest with her about the toll this research can take. They have emphasized the importance of “self care,” she said. They let her know it is OK to take a break when the mental and emotional stress of the research becomes overwhelming.

Ms. Buggs decided to take a step back last month after two African-American men and five Dallas police officers were shot and killed in the span of a few days. She watched mindless movies, doodled in coloring books, and just talked “about something other than guns for a while,” she said.

The work both excites her and exhausts her. At the beginning of her studies, in 2013, she didn’t fully appreciate what a “long-game endeavor” researching gun violence and gun policy would be. It’s a reality that experienced academics like Mr. Teret have come to terms with.

“The best you can hope for,” said Mr. Teret, “is you can go home and say to your spouse, See this graph of the incidents of these horrible things happening over the last 30 years? See where it’s dipping down a little bit now? I think that I was maybe involved in getting that done.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Ms. Buggs said she now understands the incremental change that occurs after years of research. She knows it’s a grind, not a quick fix. And she has started to use the seemingly constant stream of national gun violence as her motivation to keep going.

“The change may not come when you want it, and it may not come at the level you want it,” Ms. Buggs said. “But every step forward matters.”

A Trickle of Funding

For years, the single greatest obstacle to taking those steps forward has been funding. Though grant money for gun-violence research has fluctuated, it’s been scarce for the past two decades, said Dr. Wintemute — especially at the federal level, thanks to a 1996 Congressional measure known as the Dickey amendment, which prevented the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention from allocating money to promote gun control. Congress stripped the CDC of $2.6 million in funding, the exact amount the center had used to study firearm injury prevention the previous year.

But money has been starting to flow, little by little, into the field. In 2013 President Obama urged federal agencies to end their funding freeze on research. The National Institutes of Health asked for proposals to study firearm violence after the Sandy Hook massacre. And some states, like California, have stepped up their grant programs to make up for the dearth of federal funding, Dr. Wintemute said.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We’re still talking about a trickle here,” he said. “But the ground was dry, and now there’s a trickle.”

Guns on Campus
Read a collection of articles and commentary about gun violence, campus reactions, and gun laws that affect colleges around the country.
  • After 4-Year Delay, Kansas Colleges Move to Carry Out Campus Gun Law
  • With Campus Carry in Place, Some Texas Grad Students Make Bars Their Offices
  • A Provocative Protest Pits Pro- and Anti-Gun Activists

Still, funding remains a concern for newer academics. When Magdalena Cerdá, an associate professor at the University of California at Davis and associate director of the Violence Prevention Research Program, first told her mentors that she wanted to study firearm violence, she said, they warned against it. It would be very difficult to get any money, they told her.

So she broadened her research focus to include other factors such as drug use and mental health. Ms. Cerdá said she doesn’t regret the hybrid path she chose. But if there had been more funding options available at the time, she said, it’s a choice she would not have had to make.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ms. Cerdá has now become a mentor to other gun-violence researchers. One of them is Rose Kagawa, who recently started as a postdoctoral fellow in the program at Davis. (Dr. Wintemute is also a mentor.)

While getting her Ph.D. in epidemiology, Ms. Kagawa said, her fellow students shared a general understanding that “funding can be a question mark.” Confronting financial uncertainty in academe can be daunting, Ms. Kagawa said. And she worries that the recent increase in grant money for studying gun violence is just a phase.

“But there’s definitely hope,” Ms. Kagawa said. “I don’t feel like I’m going into some terrible dead end.”

A version of this article appeared in the September 2, 2016, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Scholarship & Research
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Emma-Pettit.png
About the Author
Emma Pettit
Emma Pettit is a senior reporter at The Chronicle who covers the ways people within higher ed work and live — whether strange, funny, harmful, or hopeful. She’s also interested in political interference on campus, as well as overlooked crevices of academe, such as a scrappy puppetry program at an R1 university and a charmed football team at a Kansas community college. Follow her on Twitter at @EmmaJanePettit, or email her at emma.pettit@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

Gun Research Enters a New Era
NIH Invites Research on Gun Violence
‘Where More Households Have Guns, the Overall Homicide Rate Goes Up’

More News

Harvard University
'Deeply Unsettling'
Harvard’s Battle With Trump Escalates as Research Money Is Suddenly Canceled
Photo-based illustration of a hand and a magnifying glass focusing on a scene from Western Carolina Universiy
Equal Opportunity
The Trump Administration Widens Its Scrutiny of Colleges, With Help From the Internet
Santa J. Ono, president of the University of Michigan, watches a basketball game on the campus in November 2022.
'He Is a Chameleon'
At U. of Michigan, Frustrations Grew Over a President Who Couldn’t Be Pinned Down
Photo-based illustration of University of Michigan's president Jeremy Santa Ono emerging from a red shape of Florida
Leadership
A Major College-President Transition Is Defined by an About-Face on DEI

From The Review

Illustration showing a valedictorian speaker who's tassel is a vintage microphone
The Review | Opinion
A Graduation Speaker Gets Canceled
By Corey Robin
Illustration showing a stack of coins and a university building falling over
The Review | Opinion
Here’s What Congress’s Endowment-Tax Plan Might Cost Your College
By Phillip Levine
Photo-based illustration of a college building under an upside down baby crib
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Must Stop Infantilizing Everyone
By Gregory Conti

Upcoming Events

Ascendium_06-10-25_Plain.png
Views on College and Alternative Pathways
Coursera_06-17-25_Plain.png
AI and Microcredentials
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin