Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    Hands-On Career Preparation
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    Alternative Pathways
Sign In
The Review

The Pernicious Silencing of the Adjunct Faculty

By Eva Swidler October 30, 2017
The Pernicious Silencing of the Adjunct Faculty 1
Michael Morgenstern for The Chronicle

The issues of justice surrounding adjunct employment in higher education affect not only adjuncts themselves but also other contingent faculty members who are on short-term contracts with low pay and minimal long-term prospects. Any college or university that hires large numbers of faculty members to work under those conditions also changes its relationship to justice. But what is rarely discussed is how the widespread use of adjuncts also affects justice in the larger society.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

The issues of justice surrounding adjunct employment in higher education affect not only adjuncts themselves but also other contingent faculty members who are on short-term contracts with low pay and minimal long-term prospects. Any college or university that hires large numbers of faculty members to work under those conditions also changes its relationship to justice. But what is rarely discussed is how the widespread use of adjuncts also affects justice in the larger society.

Over two-thirds of 2016 high-school graduates in the United States at least began college. As they enroll in introductory and general-education courses in their first semesters, they are most likely to be taught by contingent faculty members, whose assignments are concentrated in those lower-level courses. And, as the saying goes, your teachers’ working conditions are your learning conditions.

Working on multiple campuses, juggling curricula, and often having to find additional ways to pay the bills — all are reflections of the low pay and high workload that adjuncts bear. Too often, the results are stress and exhaustion. Teacher-student relationships cannot help faltering under that burden.

Less obvious are the classroom impacts of the precariousness of the adjunct work contract. Those contracts are offered (or not) semester to semester, are typically subject to cancellation up to and including the first day of classes, and are most often dependent on the yea or nay of one department chair.

What does the tenuousness of adjunct work mean for teaching and learning, and how does that affect the pursuit of justice? If your job hangs in the balance, an overriding concern is to keep the supervisor happy, keep your student evaluations uniformly positive, and keep your head down. For many adjuncts, the ideal is to come to no one’s attention.

Because your syllabus goes to the department chair at the start of each semester, controversial authors and readings get weeded out. You need to avoid negative comments from students, so you avoid assignments that might challenge anyone’s ideas, and you steer classroom conversations away from any topic that might provoke a heated discussion. You don’t want to come to the attention of administrators, so you don’t participate in speaking events or teach-ins that might draw the ire of powers-that-be.

Yes, there are department chairs and administrators who advocate for adjuncts and for an adjunct’s right and responsibility to teach freely. There are adjuncts who can afford to risk teaching freely — buffered, as I am, for instance, by an employed spouse with health insurance. There are adjuncts who do the right thing without a buffer. But no matter how heroic some of them may be, they cannot be a reliable bulwark against the effects of a system that builds job insecurity into the structure of its faculty.

Many academics are concerned that this lack of academic freedom undermines cherished ideas about the role of faculty members in higher education. My concern, though, is that this lack of the freedom to speak, sometimes uncomfortably, on charged issues in a majority of college classrooms undermines a much larger awareness and understanding of social justice.

The majority of young Americans may spend time in college classrooms, but if what they learn and discuss tiptoes around topics like exploitation, violence, and racism, what are they learning? That these are not important issues to think about? That these are not issues that should concern them? That these are issues to be ignored, or even swept under the rug, lest the boat be rocked? As the American Association of University Professors notes, the conditions of adjunct employment put students at risk of being “deprived of the debate essential to citizenship.” To this risk I would add the risk that a primary unintended lesson our students might learn from us is how to neglect justice.

More important, adjuncts’ timidity, or even fear, affects not just students but also the public at large. When contingent faculty members — who account for 70 percent of college instructors — put the renewal of their teaching contracts at risk if they dare to advise a group of student activists, or to speak about a controversial issue with a journalist, the role of academics as public intellectuals suffers.

ADVERTISEMENT

A public intellectual uses her work to pursue the public good, while addressing the public directly — through writing, lecturing, or being interviewed. Can an adjunct afford to put the public good ahead of her own job safety in her research or teaching decisions? Not long ago, the precarious nature of public speech came home to me in a personal way. A flurry of media attention around an invitation to Mumia Abu-Jamal, who is serving a life sentence in the murder of a police officer in Philadelphia, as a commencement speaker at Goddard College, where I am a part-time faculty adviser, prompted me to begin mentally composing an op-ed, speaking as a faculty member, with plans to submit the piece to a Philadelphia newspaper. Then I realized that, as an adjunct, I could not risk having my name in print over such a piece. I abandoned the project.

This year the news media carried stories about professors’ signing on to public protests of a national travel ban, faculty members writing letters decrying the bulldozing of sacred Lakota sites to build the Dakota Access Pipeline, professors petitioning their colleges to divest from fossil-fuel companies or to become sanctuary campuses. But every year, fewer and fewer faculty members can risk supporting students who take informed and ethical action in the world. The dwindling of the ranks of academically secure faculty members affects not just students but every American.

I don’t think college teachers are the only people who have valuable things to say about the world today, but I do think that public discourse is enriched when people who have spent their lives immersed in a field draw on their expertise to educate, inform, analyze, and speak, whether to their students or to the nation. Where will those voices come from, as the proportion of faculty members serving on conditional contracts continues to rise?

Eva Swidler teaches at Goddard College and at the Curtis Institute of Music.

A version of this article appeared in the November 17, 2017, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Opinion
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

The Lack of Public Intellectuals at Community Colleges
‘The Great Shame of Our Profession’
Watch What You Say

More News

Collage of charts
Data
How Faculty Pay and Tenure Can Change Depending on Academic Discipline
Vector illustration of two researcher's hands putting dollar signs into a beaker leaking green liquid.
'Life Support'
As the Nation’s Research-Funding Model Ruptures, Private Money Becomes a Band-Aid
Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through a flat black and white university building and a landscape bearing the image of a $100 bill.
Budget Troubles
‘Every Revenue Source Is at Risk’: Under Trump, Research Universities Are Cutting Back
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome topping a jar of money.
Budget Bill
Republicans’ Plan to Tax Higher Ed and Slash Funding Advances in Congress

From The Review

Photo-based illustration of the sculpture, The Thinker, interlaced with anotehr image of a robot posed as The Thinker with bits of binary code and red strips weaved in.
The Review | Essay
What I Learned Serving on My University’s AI Committee
By Megan Fritts
Illustration of a Gold Seal sticker embossed with President Trump's face
The Review | Essay
What Trump’s Accreditation Moves Get Right
By Samuel Negus
Illustration of a torn cold seal sticker embossed with President Trump's face
The Review | Essay
The Weaponization of Accreditation
By Greg D. Pillar, Laurie Shanderson

Upcoming Events

Ascendium_06-10-25_Plain.png
Views on College and Alternative Pathways
Coursera_06-17-25_Plain.png
AI and Microcredentials
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin