Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    Hands-On Career Preparation
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    Alternative Pathways
Sign In
The Review

The Problem With Calling UMBC a Cinderella

By Kevin R. McClure March 21, 2018
Players from the U. of Maryland-Baltimore County celebrate after defeating the U. of Virginia this month.
Players from the U. of Maryland-Baltimore County celebrate after defeating the U. of Virginia this month. John McDonnell, The Washington Post via Getty Images

Last week college-basketball fans witnessed a historic event. For the first time ever during March Madness, a No. 16 seed upset a No. 1 seed. The University of Maryland-Baltimore County Retrievers not only beat the University of Virginia Cavaliers — they beat them by 20 points. As often happens with upsets, the story of UMBC’s victory went viral on social media. UMBC was quickly branded this year’s “Cinderella story.”

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Players from the U. of Maryland-Baltimore County celebrate after defeating the U. of Virginia this month.
Players from the U. of Maryland-Baltimore County celebrate after defeating the U. of Virginia this month. John McDonnell, The Washington Post via Getty Images

Last week college-basketball fans witnessed a historic event. For the first time ever during March Madness, a No. 16 seed upset a No. 1 seed. The University of Maryland-Baltimore County Retrievers not only beat the University of Virginia Cavaliers — they beat them by 20 points. As often happens with upsets, the story of UMBC’s victory went viral on social media. UMBC was quickly branded this year’s “Cinderella story.”

UMBC is an excellent university with a strong reputation, particularly in the mid-Atlantic region. This reputation developed largely separate from athletics. Yet it took playing in the most competitive tournament in college basketball, and pulling off an almost miraculous feat, for people to suddenly notice the institution. In the words of Jerry Brewer of The Washington Post, “After a 74-54 win over Virginia, UMBC has America’s attention. It is ready to listen to every remarkable thing about the university.”

This is wonderful for the university’s players, students, faculty, staff, and leadership. However, it reveals a major problem in this country: our long-term, systematic neglect of public regional universities. Although UMBC got its moment in the spotlight, hundreds of institutions will never get a shot at the big dance. And this big-time oversight has big-time consequences.

I have spent the last four years working at a public regional university, and I also happen to study them. Incidentally, my university’s basketball team fell to Virginia in the first round of last year’s tournament. So I know a few things about public regional universities and being the underdog. Let me tell you a few reasons why we should not only pay attention to public regional universities but also better fund and reward them for their unique contributions to American higher education, irrespective of what happens during March Madness.

First, public regional universities educate a significant number of Americans. One estimate shows that public regional universities enroll two-thirds of people attending public four-year institutions. Some people might understandably ask, “So what?” After all, bigger and more elite institutions also educate many students. The difference is that public regional universities educate a much larger proportion of low-income, minority, and first-generation students than bigger and more elite institutions do. Among all public four-year institutions, public regionals educate an astounding 85 percent of African-American students, 74 percent of Hispanics and Latinos, and 70 percent of Native Americans.

Second, public regional universities are affordable and efficient. Many Americans are worried about the price of college and how public institutions are stewarding taxpayer money. Public regionals have had to figure out how to keep their prices low for a long time because of the types of students they serve. Raising tuition too much can have disastrous consequences for enrollment, retention, and persistence. All public institutions have been affected by reductions in per-pupil state funding, but unlike bigger and more elite institutions, public regional universities can’t frequently rely on alternative revenue sources like major private gifts or overhead from federal grants to offset budget cuts. Instead, they have to figure out how to pursue excellence with insufficient resources. It shouldn’t be too surprising that research shows that many public regional universities are cost efficient.

Third, public regional universities are committed to high-quality teaching and student success. One persistent myth is that, based on metrics like retention and graduation rates, public regional universities are lower-quality compared with bigger and more elite institutions. But it makes little sense to compare public regional universities with institutions that enjoy phenomenally more resources and educate very different students. Public regional universities are home to scholar-teachers who devote significant time to teaching and provide an unparalleled level of care to students. This type of personal attention is particularly important for minority and low-income students.

It is worth noting that, as many other institutions figure out how to attract and educate the growing population of nontraditional students, public regional universities have been helping these student succeed for decades. We should start seeing public regional universities as thought leaders in student success.

Lastly, public regional universities are regionally oriented anchor institutions, many of which serve economically depressed and rural areas. If we were to remove public regional universities from the regions they serve, we would effectively eliminate a major employer, a major producer of well-educated employees, a major cultural institution, and a major source of hope in one fell swoop. A public regional university is sometimes one of a few sites of opportunity in areas struggling with poverty and unemployment.

ADVERTISEMENT

Here are a few things we can do to reverse the pattern of underappreciation and underinvestment in public regionals:

Scrutinize our language. Many people refer to public regional universities as “non-elite,” “non-selective,” or “non-flagship.” These labels often position public regional universities in negative relation to something we see as more valuable. We should throw the label “flagship” out the window. It wrongly suggests that there is one important institution in a state and a whole bunch of supporting institutions that don’t merit notice.

Donate money to public regionals. As an employee of a public regional university, I’m biased, but I think donations go farther at our institutions. My undergraduate alma mater is a wealthy private college. I have the fondest memories of my time there, but they are financially in good shape. My donation makes more of a difference at a place like the University of North Carolina at Wilmington.

Get over our infatuation with bigger and more elite institutions. Research on public regional universities is not nearly as developed as it should be, given the importance of these institutions. And much of it is quantitative in nature, which can be helpful, but doesn’t always tell the story of these institutions in a nuanced way. Researchers almost always discuss public regional universities from a deficit perspective, recycling a narrative of institutions in crisis, struggling to stay open, on the brink of extinction. Stop that. Take the enthusiasm that emerged from the UMBC victory and apply that appreciative lens to public regional universities broadly.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ask big questions about state funding formulas. A disproportionate share of resources flows to bigger, more research-oriented universities. Performance-based funding can exacerbate these inequities. I struggle to argue for cutting funding to any public institution, but public regional universities are not being funded at levels commensurate with their contributions.

Like Cinderella, many public regional universities are cast out, mistreated, and unloved unless they are given the chance to be viewed as something higher-status. UMBC got that chance, but it is just one institution among many. My hope is that we can view public regional universities as national treasures without having to rely on the magic of a major sports victory.

Kevin R. McClure is an assistant professor of higher education at the University of North Carolina at Wilmington. A version of this essay originally appeared on his blog, Red Bricks and Mortar Boards.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Admissions & Enrollment Finance & Operations Opinion First-Generation Students
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Kevin R. McClure of the U. of North Carolina at Wilmington
About the Author
Kevin R. McClure
Kevin R. McClure is an associate professor of higher education at the University of North Carolina at Wilmington and co-director of the Alliance for Research on Regional Colleges. He writes the Working Better column for The Chronicle on workplace reform in academe. His new book, The Caring University: Reimagining the Higher Education Workplace after the Great Resignation, is forthcoming from the Johns Hopkins University Press.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

How Much Can a University Make of a March Madness Cinderella Story?
Public Regional Colleges Never Die. Can They Be Saved?
The Plight of the Public Regional College

More News

Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through a flat black and white university building and a landscape bearing the image of a $100 bill.
Budget Troubles
‘Every Revenue Source Is at Risk’: Under Trump, Research Universities Are Cutting Back
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome topping a jar of money.
Budget Bill
Republicans’ Plan to Tax Higher Ed and Slash Funding Advances in Congress
Allison Pingree, a Cambridge, Mass. resident, joined hundreds at an April 12 rally urging Harvard to resist President Trump's influence on the institution.
International
Trump Administration Revokes Harvard’s Ability to Enroll International Students
Photo-based illustration of an open book with binary code instead of narrative paragraphs
Culture Shift
The Reading Struggle Meets AI

From The Review

Illustration of a Gold Seal sticker embossed with President Trump's face
The Review | Essay
What Trump’s Accreditation Moves Get Right
By Samuel Negus
Illustration of a torn cold seal sticker embossed with President Trump's face
The Review | Essay
The Weaponization of Accreditation
By Greg D. Pillar, Laurie Shanderson
Protestors gather outside the Pro-Palestinian encampment on the campus of UCLA in Los Angeles on Wednesday, May 1, 2024.
The Review | Conversation
Are Colleges Rife With Antisemitism? If So, What Should Be Done?
By Evan Goldstein, Len Gutkin

Upcoming Events

Ascendium_06-10-25_Plain.png
Views on College and Alternative Pathways
Coursera_06-17-25_Plain.png
AI and Microcredentials
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin