> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
Advice
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

The ‘So What?’ Question

You may be convinced that your paper has a solid central argument. Here are three ways to tell when it doesn’t.

By  Theresa MacPhail
July 17, 2017
full_Vitae-publishing-summer.jpg
www.Pixel.la Free Stock Photos, Creative Commons, Public Domain

It’s midsummer, which, if you’re an academic, may mean you are traveling or firing up the grill, but it most definitely means you are trying to get some of your research and writing done. By summer’s end, you are hoping to press the submit button.

But, wait. I’d like you to pause a moment from your daily diligence — grinding out future articles and book chapters — and think about those of us who work as editors and manuscript reviewers. And I’d like to ask a big favor — one that will benefit us and you. Before you send in that manuscript, take a second look at that draft you’ve polished three or four times and ask yourself the following question: What is my main argument here?

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

It’s midsummer, which, if you’re an academic, may mean you are traveling or firing up the grill, but it most definitely means you are trying to get some of your research and writing done. By summer’s end, you are hoping to press the submit button.

But, wait. I’d like you to pause a moment from your daily diligence — grinding out future articles and book chapters — and think about those of us who work as editors and manuscript reviewers. And I’d like to ask a big favor — one that will benefit us and you. Before you send in that manuscript, take a second look at that draft you’ve polished three or four times and ask yourself the following question: What is my main argument here?

Without a central argument, a piece of writing is a structural mess. It’s confusing. It is frequently repetitive. It meanders. It reads like a laundry list of interesting ideas on a subject, it promises things it doesn’t deliver, and, ultimately, it tasks the patience of even the most generous of readers, turning us all into some version of the dreaded Reviewer No. 2.

In our digital age, we all have much more to read and far less time in which to do it. What editors, reviewers, and readers, including myself, really want to know when we sit down to read your work is: Why should we spend our precious spare time reading this? If you don’t answer that question in the introductory section of your article or book, readers are not going to keep reading. Period. And you want them to keep reading, right? Of course you do.

Now I know what a lot of you are thinking at this point: This is basic level stuff. This is Writing 101. You’re way past this. You didn’t get this far in academe without knowing how to craft a thesis statement. This advice isn’t for you.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let me assure you, it probably is.

As the digital editor of one of my field’s top journals — and as someone who is asked to review manuscripts for major academic publishers on a fairly regular basis — I see a lot of polished texts by sophisticated thinkers whose writing, nonetheless, either has no argument whatsoever or has 17 smaller arguments peppered throughout the text, not one of which binds everything together.

In the past few months alone, I’ve had to write so many comments to authors pointing out their lack of an argument and their poor organizational structure that I’m forced to believe this is a much more widespread problem than I’d originally imagined. And it’s a problem at all levels of scholarship — from graduate students to renowned professors. It distresses me, as someone trained in both writing and editing, to read manuscripts that lack a strong thesis. As a scholar, it depresses me.

In an effort to stem the problem, I offer here the top three signs that you may not have a solid central argument — even when you think you already do.

  • You can’t answer the “So what?” question. When I’m editing, I often write “So what?” in the margins of a piece to indicate that the author hasn’t told me why I should care about it. A good central argument will not only answer that question, but also tell us what you’re going to argue, how, and why. A good text answers the “So what?” question for the reader — it doesn’t just tell us a bunch of interesting facts and then ask us to sort them out by ourselves. Academic articles and books are not written like mysteries: You shouldn’t have to wait until page 15 of a 17-page article — or until the final chapter of a book — to learn the point of the piece. In fact, I’ve often found that manuscripts lacking a strong argument often have a nascent one buried in their conclusions.
  • Your introduction and conclusion don’t mesh. Reread your opening and closing sections together and highlight the main argument and supporting claims. If you can’t do that — or if they don’t match — then you don’t have a central thesis. If you have three or four arguments in the introduction (or, god forbid, more), then decide which one you’ll give primacy and which ones are sub-arguments. Your overarching argument may be made up of sub-arguments and ancillary claims, but there should be something that ties all those multiple arguments and claims together. It’s the bright red thread that connects all the various pieces into a beautifully interwoven text. It’s what you keep looping back to, and what allows the reader to follow your argument all the way through. (Cautionary note: The red thread is not simply the subject of your text, it’s the framing theoretical argument. Sure, every chapter of your book talks about the threat of extinction of pink dolphins, but that’s not an argument. The red thread tells us why we should bother to read an entire book on pink dolphins.)
  • Your colleagues can’t explain your main argument. Have people you trust (like your writing partner) read your introduction and tell you what they think your central argument is. If they had to finish this sentence — “This article/book argues that …” — what would they say? If their description doesn’t match what you think you’ve argued, then you have some work to do (assuming you’ve picked smart people). Go back and fix your structure and prose to reflect the actual argument you want to make. If they can’t find your main argument, then they will likely ask you some terrific questions that will lead you to it. Readers are terrifically helpful like that, which is why it’s so crucial to find one or two people who are willing to look over your drafts.

Trust me, no one who edits or reviews your submission wants to be Reviewer No. 2. We all want to love the piece of writing that we’ve been charged with reviewing or editing. Ensuring that you have a strong central argument at the core of your text — before you submit it anywhere — will lead not only to better organization and clearer prose, but to happier readers all along the production line.

ADVERTISEMENT

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Scholarship & ResearchGraduate EducationTeaching & Learning
Theresa MacPhail
Theresa MacPhail is an associate professor in the science and technology studies program at the Stevens Institute of Technology. Browse her previous columns on writing and academic work here.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin