Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    AI and Microcredentials
Sign In
The Review

The Surprising Value That Need-Based Aid Brings

By Sandy Baum January 1, 2017
CarlsonEarnings-1014 The Surprising Value  That Need-Based Aid Brings 1
Mark Shaver for The Chronicle

In the academic year 2015-16, colleges and universities in the United States distributed almost $55 billion in institutional grant aid to their students, meaning that they discounted their sticker prices by that amount. Those dollars make college more affordable for students and families, but their impact on institutional revenues is not so simple.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

CarlsonEarnings-1014 The Surprising Value  That Need-Based Aid Brings 1
Mark Shaver for The Chronicle

In the academic year 2015-16, colleges and universities in the United States distributed almost $55 billion in institutional grant aid to their students, meaning that they discounted their sticker prices by that amount. Those dollars make college more affordable for students and families, but their impact on institutional revenues is not so simple.

Some colleges could fill their classes with students who would enroll even without the discount, and for those institutions this aid is a real expenditure. The purpose may be to ease financial pressures for students and families and/or to recruit students with desirable qualities such as high grades or an exceptional curve ball.

But for most colleges, discounting is a strategy crucial to the enrollment process: They would have fewer students and potentially significantly less tuition revenue if they insisted that everyone pay the full posted price.

Need-based aid is not just for the poor; it is also for middle-income students and others whose circumstances make paying for college from personal resources particularly difficult.

It’s important, however, to ask not just how much institutional grant aid colleges are distributing, but also which students are benefiting. Is the aid going to low- and moderate-income students who would not be able to afford to enroll without it? Is it going to star athletes? Is it going to students with high test scores who could afford to pay but would be likely to choose other institutions if they weren’t offered a discount?

Drawing a line between need-based and non-need-based aid can get complicated. Institutions know how they have chosen their aid recipients. Did the students apply for financial aid, providing information about income and assets? Did a calculation of their ability to pay yield a measure of financial need that led the college to award them grant aid? Or did they receive a scholarship based on their high-school grades or test scores or on the recommendation of a coach or a music teacher?

A significant amount of non-need-based aid actually goes to students with financial need, helping them as much as a need-based award would. In 2011-12, some 41 percent of the non-need-based grants that were awarded to full-time students at private nonprofit colleges, and 26 percent at public four-year colleges, was non-need-based aid that helped students meet financial need. It was awarded for reasons other than financial circumstances, but it served the purpose of need-based aid.

Recognizing the difference between aid that meets need and aid beyond need is important for institutions because it affects the size, academic characteristics, and demographics of their student bodies, in addition to their net revenues. It is also important for higher education as a whole and for the society it serves.

Using aid to affect institutional choice may induce students to switch from one college to a similar one, while need-based aid is much more likely to increase the number of students who enroll in college at all or who enroll in the four-year institutions to which they aspire.

ADVERTISEMENT

Colleges may see short-term gains from generous financial aid to students from affluent families — the colleges may move up in the rankings, or they may temporarily increase their net revenues. But some competitor institution is very likely paying for these gains and could get into a bidding war to stem the loss of desirable students.

On the other hand, aid to students with very limited resources is much more likely both to achieve the social goal of increasing educational attainment and to succeed in increasing the number of students enrolling in, for example, private colleges or four-year public colleges in a particular state.

Pricing data on the College Scorecard website suggest that it is not at all uncommon for the lowest-income students to pay higher net prices than those from families further up the income scale. Even when net prices increase with income, the gaps between groups are quite small. The number of Pell Grant recipients whom individual institutions enroll gets quite a bit of attention, and underfunding of need-based aid can have a significant negative impact on this very public measure.

But need-based aid doesn’t go just to Pell Grant recipients. A family can have an income much higher than $50,000 and still need help paying the price of a selective private college or even a flagship public. This is why need-based aid is not just for the poor; it is also for middle-income students and others whose circumstances make paying for college from personal resources particularly difficult. And this broader view is important for administrators to consider in weighing the role of need-based aid in the institutional budget.

ADVERTISEMENT

Need-based aid is valuable for the nation, but it is also valuable for colleges. It’s OK if institutions increase this type of aid because of public pressure, but they should also understand that it is in their interest to enroll a socioeconomically diverse class. Moreover, excluding students for financial reasons means enrolling students with weaker academic qualifications or who are a more questionable fit just because they can pay.

Aid based on need is also good for the bottom line in the long run. The number of families who can pay the full price of tuition, fees, room, and board without financial assistance — especially at private colleges but increasingly also at public colleges — is small. Fighting over that limited number of students is going to end up depleting funds and leaving many colleges underenrolled. Need-based aid can ensure that qualified students with limited ability to pay can enroll in the institutions best suited to their needs.

This doesn’t mean that there is no place for non-need-based aid. Some institutions are full of students whose need they can’t possibly afford to meet. For those colleges, socioeconomic diversity means attracting more students from relatively affluent backgrounds who could afford to pay but need financial encouragement to bring them to a particular campus. Even some relatively well-resourced institutions with high admissions standards may find that they can’t both bring in a class and pay the bills if they don’t use their aid funds strategically to increase the number of students paying high net prices.

Institutional financial aid has multiple purposes. But for nonprofit colleges whose goal is to provide high-quality educational opportunities, and whose tax-exempt status is based on contributions to society, making attendance possible for students who could not otherwise afford to enroll should be near the top of the list.

ADVERTISEMENT

Most institutions can’t accomplish this goal without careful financial management, which may involve giving discounts to some students who don’t really need them. There are always trade-offs, but remember this: Need-based aid is no luxury.

Sandy Baum is a senior fellow in the Income and Benefits Policy Center at the Urban Institute and a professor emerita of economics at Skidmore College.

A version of this article appeared in the January 6, 2017, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Opinion
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

The Financial-Aid Shell Game
Cost and Financial Aid Increasingly Influence Students’ Choice of College

More News

Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues
Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through paper that is a photo of an idyllic liberal arts college campus on one side and money on the other
Finance
Small Colleges Are Banding Together Against a Higher Endowment Tax. This Is Why.
Pano Kanelos, founding president of the U. of Austin.
Q&A
One Year In, What Has ‘the Anti-Harvard’ University Accomplished?

From The Review

Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome propped on a stick attached to a string, like a trap.
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Can’t Trust the Federal Government. What Now?
By Brian Rosenberg
Illustration of an unequal sign in black on a white background
The Review | Essay
What Is Replacing DEI? Racism.
By Richard Amesbury
FILE -- University of Michigan President Santa Ono speaks during a Board of Regents meeting in Ann Arbor, Mich., Dec. 5, 2024. The University of Florida's new president will be Ono, a biomedical researcher lured from the top job at the University of Michigan with a large pay package, despite criticism of him that social conservatives raised.
The Review | Opinion
The Ruination of Santa Ono
By Silke-Maria Weineck

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin