> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • Ascendium Resource Center
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
News
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

‘They’re Leaving Low-Income Students in the Lurch’: Public Colleges Have Doubled Down on Merit Aid, Report Says

By  Emma Dill
February 12, 2020
The U. of Alabama recorded a more than $123-million increase in non-need-based aid from 2001 to 2017.
U. of Alabama
The U. of Alabama recorded a more than $123-million increase in non-need-based aid from 2001 to 2017.

Over the last two decades, public colleges have sharply increased the amount of merit aid they’ve offered — a strategy that comes at the expense of low-income and working-class students, a new study finds.

A report on the study, released by the policy think tank New America, examines how 339 public institutions spent their aid dollars from 2001 to 2017. The study is based on data from the college-guidebook publisher Peterson’s. During that period, more than half of the universities in the study doubled the inflation-adjusted amount they spent on non-need-based aid.

We're sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network.

Please allow access to our site, and then refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, please contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

Over the last two decades, public colleges have sharply increased the amount of merit aid they’ve offered — a strategy that comes at the expense of low-income and working-class students, a new study finds.

A report on the study, released by the policy think tank New America, examines how 339 public institutions spent their aid dollars from 2001 to 2017. The study is based on data from the college-guidebook publisher Peterson’s. During that period, more than half of the universities in the study doubled the inflation-adjusted amount they spent on non-need-based aid.

That increased spending is part of a long-term trend that is often driven by a desire to attract wealthier students, said Donald E. Heller, a professor of education at the University of San Francisco who has done similar research.

The pressure to attract wealthier students often stems from the financial pressures colleges face. State governments, strapped for cash, are increasingly divesting from public institutions. Meanwhile, both private and public colleges are increasingly concerned with raising their ranking and status.

ADVERTISEMENT

That has led to a change in philosophy about student recruitment, said Stephen Burd, the report’s author. (Burd was a reporter for The Chronicle from 1991 to 2007.)

Because of those pressures, providing financial aid is sometimes focused on meeting an institution’s goals instead of satisfying student need. “That, unfortunately, means that the emphasis becomes more on raising revenue and on rising up the rankings, and in all those ways creates incentives for the schools to go after wealthier students,” Burd said.

The changing dynamics among students entering higher education are also playing a role, Heller said. “Students are applying to more and more universities, which means they’re getting into more and more universities, which means they have more and more financial-aid offers to play off against other institutions,” he said. “I think institutions are feeling more pressure to put the best financial-aid offer they can on the table when they admit a student.”

The new report does more than chronicle a trend. It also names the colleges that saw the largest jump in non-need-based aid. Topping the list were the University of Alabama and Temple and Arizona State Universities. The University of Alabama recorded a more than $123-million increase in non-need-based aid from 2001 to 2017.

Reached by phone, representatives of Arizona State said the increase in non-need-based awards could be traced to an enormous increase in enrollment — the 12-month head count rose by 42,520 students from 2001 to 2017, the representatives said, with nonresident enrollment roughly doubling. They also cited a conscious shift to recruiting out-of-state students, who often receive merit aid.

ADVERTISEMENT

A Temple University representative also cited an increase in students and said the institution’s philosophy toward aid had shifted, since 2017, toward helping students in financial need. The University of Alabama did not respond to a request for comment.

Ronald G. Ehrenberg, director of Cornell University’s Higher Education Research Institute, said that colleges often face a trade-off between public service and private prestige in offering financial aid.

He said a college’s president and governing board are often the ones who can set its direction and determine whether to focus on providing need-based or non-need-based aid.

“They can make a decision to say, We want our institution to focus more on social mobility and focus more on helping poor students get to college, rather than just moving up in the U.S. News & World Report rankings,” Heller said.

When interpreting studies that examine spending on aid, Heller said, people must take into account that some of the merit spending is directed toward low-income students. Still, wealthy students are more likely to receive merit-based aid. “There’s no question that when an institution is spending more money on merit, all other things being equal, more of their money is going to be funneled to wealthier students,” he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Burd, the report’s author, said the federal government needs to get involved in the issue to ensure that students who need aid are receiving it.

“Colleges are not spending their financial-aid dollars the way that they’re supposed to be,” Burd said. “And they’re leaving low-income students in the lurch.” That is true of “even our public universities, which are supposed to be the ones that are helping, even more so than private colleges, low-income and working-class students rise up and to be able to provide a ladder to the middle class.”

A version of this article appeared in the February 21, 2020, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Admissions & Enrollment
Emma Dill
Emma Dill is an editorial intern at The Chronicle. She recently graduated from the University of Minnesota where she wrote for her campus newspaper, The Minnesota Daily. She has interned at newspapers in Florida, Wisconsin and Minnesota.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Accessibility Statement
    Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin