Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    Student Housing
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
CHE_TeneureErosion-01.jpg
John Tomac for The Chronicle

They’ve Been Scheming to Cut Tenure for Years. It’s Happening.

We’re in the execution phase of the profession’s demise.

The Review | Opinion
By Jacques Berlinerblau February 1, 2023

So honored to have accepted a tenure-track position as an assistant professor in the history department of U.FU. #Blessed

Tweets such as the hypothetical one above leave me troubled. I’m troubled because 500 scholars probably applied for the position at U.FU. What is the destiny of the unblessed 499, other than to mentally counter-tweet with rude, unpublishable hashtags?

A thimbleful of scholars will someday snag a tenure-track job. A few dozen will join the ranks of the non-tenure-line full-time faculty (or NTLFT), laboring from contract to contract, earning a sparse salary and receiving limited benefits. Hundreds will be thrust into the churning, draining gyre that is the adjunct pool. Absurdly low wages and zero job security — that is their lot. As for the remainder, they will eventually realize they were on the “Alt-Ac” track all along, even though they never wanted to be.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

So honored to have accepted a tenure-track position as an assistant professor in the history department of U.FU. #Blessed

Tweets such as the hypothetical one above leave me troubled. I’m troubled because 500 scholars probably applied for the position at U.FU. What is the destiny of the unblessed 499, other than to mentally counter-tweet with rude, unpublishable hashtags?

A thimbleful of scholars will someday snag a tenure-track job. A few dozen will join the ranks of the non-tenure-line full-time faculty (or NTLFT), laboring from contract to contract, earning a sparse salary and receiving limited benefits. Hundreds will be thrust into the churning, draining gyre that is the adjunct pool. Absurdly low wages and zero job security — that is their lot. As for the remainder, they will eventually realize they were on the “Alt-Ac” track all along, even though they never wanted to be.

Tenure-line, NTLFT, adjuncts: These are the three estates of modern academe. They have been skillfully positioned by their overlords to check, balance, and often immiserate one another. Though as we shall see, external pressures alone don’t explain why we are divided and conquered.

As we enter the Execution Phase (2020-50) of the American professoriate’s reconfiguration, I hazard a few predictions. First, the mightiest of the three estates will be brought to its knees. By the year 2050, tenure will be either the purview of a few scholars at elite schools, or it won’t exist at all.

Second, academic freedom will be as good as gone. We’ll labor as we did prior to the American Association of University Professors’ 1940 Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom and Tenure. The scholar who runs afoul of a trustee, congressperson, tech mogul, or influencer will — poof! — disappear into the night. Last, the divisions and mistrust between the professorial ranks will hasten the developments just described, as well as other malign outcomes.

Only a miracle of guild solidarity can forestall our dystopian future — a future which, for contingent faculty, is actually the present.

Before the Execution Phase, there was the Preparation Phase (1990-2020). Its soundscape was sirens and shrieking warnings about our vocation’s imminent collapse. Higher-ups instructed us to ignore the smoke and odd noises. Everyone was enjoined to calmly return to their offices and publish — so as not to perish.

CHE_TeneureErosion_Print-01.jpg
John W. Tomac for The Chronicle

Those decades had it all: the occasional SLACicide, or death of a small liberal-arts college; plunging humanities enrollments; state legislatures strafing higher-education budgets; entrenched racialized and gendered gaps in employment; bidding wars over celebrity faculty. A catastrophic two-tiered structure loomed: A small number of tenured professors were being paid more to teach undergraduates less and less, while a large number of non-tenured professors were being paid less to teach undergraduates more and more.

By the turn of the millennium, clear-eyed observers, many of whom understood economics and statistical modeling, started identifying independent variables. Their findings pointed to a slow, steady decline in costly tenure-line positions, coupled with the increased exploitation of cheap part-time labor.

ADVERTISEMENT

A 2008 study compiled by the AAUP demonstrated the problem. In 1975, 56.8 percent of American professors were either tenured or on the tenure track. By 2007 the number had sunk to 31.2 percent. Simultaneously, all contingent positions had risen from 43.2 percent to 68.8 percent.

We also became aware of “administrative bloat,” or the mushrooming of an academic labor force whose mission was neither teaching nor research. A number of upper admins were hired to manage — some might say “rule” — the faculty. Some of those who accepted this task were scholars themselves. A novel hybrid creature, the everlasting tenured admin, was sparked to life. No three-year stint as vice dean and back to teaching freshman composition, for this guy! He was in it for the long haul.

The significance of this development is underappreciated. The decisions which ravaged the future for coming generations of Ph.D.s were made not just by consultants and suits, but by those with Ph.D.s and likely a few peer-reviewed publications. This was scholar-on-scholar violence.

Why is our vocation so vulnerable to fratricide? Maybe spending a doctoral decade in a moldy archive doesn’t heighten your sense of empathy. Maybe repeatedly venting your spleen as anonymous Reviewer Number 2 doesn’t sharpen your sense of solidarity. Maybe class consciousness can’t blossom when our final work products are, in many disciplines, solo recitals.

ADVERTISEMENT

Another top-line finding had to do with the rise of the NTLFT class. The expansion of this category from the mid-1970s to the mid-aughts was, in and of itself, a positive development. Merely getting on the tenure track — at even the most forlorn, out-of-the-way, campus novel-y seat of learning — had become like winning a lottery. Many excellent scholars never hit the jackpot, even though they may have been more qualified than the grand-prize winners. The surge in NTLFT ranks let them make a living.

It also set the stage for the imminent implosion of the professoriate.

The rise of the NTLFTs is a story that spans my two phases. The Execution Phase commenced in 2020, when the Covid pandemic — that alehouse crony of disruption — blasted us out of our classrooms. Some recent data provide perspective on where we now stand.

A survey of 3271 institutions (1271 of which have no tenure system) from 2002-21 revealed that NTLFTs are the only one of the professorial ranks that has been trending “up.” If the status quo holds, my eyeball extrapolation suggests that by midcentury, there will be nearly as many NTLFTs as tenured professors.

ADVERTISEMENT

But as regards tenure lines, why would the status quo hold? Why wouldn’t our extinction event occur well prior to January 1, 2050?

Only a miracle of guild solidarity can forestall our dystopian future.

According to the survey, 23.63 percent of professors are tenured, and 8.77 percent are on the tenure track. The former number will likely diminish quickly. Tenure-track positions are not being renewed (53.5 percent of all institutions have replaced tenure lines with contingent faculty in the past five years). Existing tenured professors are increasingly subject to “post-tenure review” or the vagaries of “de-tenurification” — antilabor munitions that were test-bombed during the Preparation Phase.

I imagine a moment called “Tenure’s Tribulation.” Upon its arrival, we will all realize that, cliché or not, Ernest Hemingway’s dictum, “gradually, then suddenly,” is prescient. On a summer day (circa 2035) a small consortium of schools (and soon thereafter hundreds more) will make a historic announcement. Because of unforeseen financial “challenges,” they can no longer hire tenure-line faculty. Those who are currently tenured on staff can remain and play out the string of their careers (subject to post-tenure review).

ADVERTISEMENT

Which leads us to the war of the ranks. Through no fault of their own, the growing NTLFT cohort will occupy more of the administrative roles mentioned earlier. Untenured department chairs, untenured vice deans, untenured deans, and untenured provosts — they will manage/rule the graying tenured faculty and the irate part-timers.

Not that professors would ever disagree about anything, but in a disagreement between an untenured dean executing a command from a tenured provost against the will of the tenured codgers, who comes out on top? Who slays? Who, come to think of it, is actually running the institution at this point?

I hope the NTLFT folk will be more conscientious than their tenured counterparts have been; we wouldn’t be in such straits if the latter had demonstrated more foresight, heroism. Then again if a provost wants an opinionated full professor or adjunct “put in their place,” or a donor’s pet project made into a major (see below), or the Gateway Course’s enrollment cap to rise from 15 freshmen to 150, what sort of “pushback” might an NTLFT dean be able to muster?

What else awaits us? Goodbye robust, academic-freedom protections for the tenured. Hello provost’s Ad Hoc Committee to Resolve Academic-Freedom Disputes. Free-speech conflicts will now be handled on a “case by case” basis. Maybe we’ll see a rise in programs catered to “lifestyle Ph.D.s.” They could service a leisure class curious about aesthetics in the age of neoliberalism.

ADVERTISEMENT

As for donors and foundations, they will feast on the flailing, overturned, host organism which is the American university. Fields of inquiry that colleges don’t care about (like religious studies), or areas only the wealthy find intriguing (like the history of the capital gains tax), will find committed benefactors.

The decisions which ravaged the future for coming generations of Ph.D.s were made not just by consultants and suits, but by those with Ph.D.s.

Imagine some foundation in Manhattan or Lubbock, Texas, overseeing yearly funding for 20 postdocs, 100 adjuncts, 20 NTLFTs, and one tenured professor sprinkled across a few dozen elite schools. It would be like a transnational academic department, albeit one whose “chair” never finished college and made a fortune in venture capital.

Now what? The best course of action is collective bargaining, and it is the hardest to achieve. That’s not only because laws regarding labor organization at private and public universities are complicated. It’s also because we scholars don’t “do” solidarity.

ADVERTISEMENT

But what if we did? Graduate students are effectively organizing themselves; maybe they should offer seminars on the subject to faculty members. Ideally, the tenured might leverage their (present) security on behalf of the next generation. We could “pay it forward,” offering to teach more classes for free if administrators stopped vaporizing our lines when we die and retire. Or maybe we’ll promise to retire well before we die? Anything that creates a future for scholars. Anything that fosters solidarity.

This is what I am going to do. One day before the spring break of 2023, I’ll spend five minutes telling my undergraduates why I became a scholar, what I think is happening to my profession, and how it affects their education. I invite you to do the same. I have no script for you to follow; all takes are welcome. Just listen carefully to your students’ responses. Then, maybe, tweet about guild solidarity.

A version of this article appeared in the February 17, 2023, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
The Workplace Career Advancement
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Jacques Berlinerblau
Jacques Berlinerblau (jberlinerblau.com) is a professor of Jewish civilization at Georgetown University and an MSNBC columnist. He writes about political secularism, free-speech controversies in the arts, and American higher education. He is the author of numerous books, including Campus Confidential: How College Works, or Doesn’t, for Professors, Parents, and Students (Melville House). His forthcoming work is Can I Laugh at That? Global Comedic Controversies in the Digital Age (University of California Press).
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

UCLA students, researchers and demonstrators rally during a "Kill the Cuts" protest against the Trump administration's funding cuts on research, health and higher education at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) in Los Angeles on April 8, 2025.
Scholarship & Research
Trump Proposed Slashing the National Science Foundation’s Budget. A Key Senate Committee Just Refused.
Illustration of a steamroller rolling over a colorful road and leaving gray asphalt in its wake.
Newly Updated
Oregon State U. Will End a Renowned Program That Aimed to Reduce Bias in Hiring
Dr. Gregory Washington, president of George Mason University.
Another probe
George Mason President Discriminated Against White People After George Floyd Protests, Justice Dept. Says
Protesters gather outside the Department of Education headquarters in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 14, 2025 to protest the Trump administrations cuts at the agency.
An Uncertain Future
The Education Dept. Got a Green Light to Shrink. Here Are 3 Questions About What’s Next.

From The Review

Photo-based illustration with repeated images of a student walking, in the pattern of a graph trending down, then up.
The Review | Opinion
7 Ways Community Colleges Can Boost Enrollment
By Bob Levey
Illustration of an ocean tide shaped like Donald Trump about to wash away sandcastles shaped like a college campus.
The Review | Essay
Why Universities Are So Powerless in Their Fight Against Trump
By Jason Owen-Smith
Photo-based illustration of a closeup of a pencil meshed with a circuit bosrd
The Review | Essay
How Are Students Really Using AI?
By Derek O'Connell

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin