Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
Politics and Race

This Ohio Bill Wouldn’t Just Ban Diversity Training. It Would Reshape Higher Ed.

By Kate Marijolovic March 30, 2023
Hiring a Diversity Officer Is Only the First Step.  Here Are the Next 7. 1
Martin León Barreto for The Chronicle

Amid the tidal wave of proposals across the country that would eliminate diversity efforts at public colleges, Ohio’s Senate Bill 83 stands out.

The 39-page bill could reshape higher education in the state, with provisions that would ban many diversity initiatives, require annual faculty performance reviews, create new graduation requirements, potentially bar Chinese students from enrolling, and mandate the language colleges must include in their mission statements.

State Sen. Jerry C. Cirino, a Republican

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Amid the tidal wave of proposals across the country that would eliminate diversity efforts at public colleges, Ohio’s Senate Bill 83 stands out.

The 39-page bill could reshape higher education in the state, with provisions that would ban many diversity initiatives, require annual faculty performance reviews, create new graduation requirements, potentially bar Chinese students from enrolling, and mandate the language colleges must include in their mission statements.

State Sen. Jerry C. Cirino, a Republican, who introduced the legislation, did not respond to a request for comment. An Ohio Department of Higher Education spokesman declined to comment on the bill and said the department “does not establish positions on new legislation until the governor begins the process of involvement in the bill.”

Here’s The Chronicle’s analysis of how the bill could affect the state’s colleges.

Banning DEI

The bill says the state would withhold money from public colleges unless they declare that they will not require students, faculty, or staff to take part in diversity training or programs. Diversity, equity, and inclusion programs are described as a “controversial belief or policy” in the bill.

Public colleges would also be prevented from using diversity statements, or other so-called “political and ideological litmus tests,” in hiring or promotion.

Additionally, before a new course is approved, the college must submit “intellectual diversity rubrics,” which the bill does not define.

Track DEI legislation and its affect on college campuses

5/31/2025 Promo
  • Explore maps, read descriptions, and check the status of bills in states where lawmakers are seeking to restrict colleges’ DEI efforts.
  • Learn how laws are affecting college campuses.
  • Visit The Assault on DEI for related stories.

It’s unclear if Senate Bill 83 would prevent colleges from funding diversity, equity, and inclusion offices and staff. The bill states that no state institutions can fund or support “any position, material benefit, policy, program, and activity that advantages or disadvantages faculty, staff, or students by any group identity.” An exception states that institutions may offer advantages to U.S. citizens and Ohio residents.

Diversity scholarships may also be in jeopardy: The bill would prevent state institutions from having any policies or programs “designed explicitly to segregate faculty, staff, or students by group identities such as race, sex, gender identity, or gender expression.”

ADVERTISEMENT

This restriction would apply to academic majors, financial awards, on-campus housing, employment, and extracurriculars, as well as events like orientation programs, student training, and graduations.

More State Oversight

The new bill would require colleges to post all of their course syllabi online. It would also require state institutions of higher education to include specific, state-mandated language in their mission statements.

“The institution affirms that its duty is to ensure that no aspect of life at the institution, within or outside the classroom, requires, favors, disfavors, or prohibits speech or action to support any political, social, or religious belief,” reads one of five points that colleges would need to include.

ADVERTISEMENT

The bill would also add a new graduation requirement for some degree-seeking students: Students in associate and bachelor’s degree programs would have to pass an American history or American government class to graduate.

The bill also stipulates material that must be taught in the course. Students must read the entirety of the U.S. Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, five essays from the Federalist Papers, the Emancipation proclamation, the Gettysburg Address, and Martin Luther King Jr.’s “Letter from a Birmingham Jail.”

In a departure from most other diversity-related proposals circulating in state legislatures, private colleges would also be subject to some provisions in Senate Bill 83. The legislation stipulates that private institutions will receive state funds only if they do not require diversity training, post all of their course syllabi online, and eliminate “political and ideological litmus tests.” Private institutions must also submit an affirmation document saying they adhere to these rules with requests for state funding.

Impact on Faculty

Colleges and universities would be required to create a disciplinary process for professors who interfere with anyone’s “intellectual diversity rights.” Intellectual diversity is defined as “multiple, divergent, and opposing perspectives on an extensive range of public policy issues … but which are poorly represented on campus.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Each year, faculty members would receive a numerical score based on their student evaluations, which institutions would be required to post publicly online. Student evaluations would also affect the annual performance evaluations the bill calls for.

Performance evaluations would take into account a range of factors, including research, services, and administration. Student evaluations would make up at least half of the teaching category of an evaluation.

The bill would institute new post-tenure-review policies tied to those faculty-performance evaluations. Faculty members who do not meet performance expectations for two out of three years would be placed under post-tenure review. Department chairs, deans of faculty, and provosts would have the authority to request post-tenure reviews at any time if faculty members have a “documented and sustained record of significant underperformance.”

The bill would also prevent all members of a state institution of higher education from striking, allowing public employers to seek injunctions against any strikes that may occur.

ADVERTISEMENT

The purview of the state’s chancellor of higher education would expand as more state oversight goes into effect.

The chancellor would be responsible for creating “educational” programs to train members of the boards of trustees at public colleges. The chancellor would also have to create new questions for student course evaluations aimed at ensuring no violations of the bill are happening in the classroom.

“Does the faculty member create a classroom atmosphere free of political, racial, gender, and religious bias?” reads one question suggested in the bill language.

China

Students from China might be unable to attend state universities in Ohio. If the bill passes, state institutions would not be allowed to accept any funds from China or organizations or individuals who may be acting on the country’s behalf, specifically students and their family members. The legislation doesn’t say explicitly whether this ban on funds would apply to students’ tuition payments.

ADVERTISEMENT

Thousands of Chinese students attend college in Ohio, though their numbers have been declining at some institutions in recent years. Across the U.S., about 63,000 student visas were issued to Chinese nationals in the government’s 2022 fiscal year.

Institutions would also be required to report any contributions they receive from organizations affiliated with China, including Confucius Institutes, government-affiliated programs that teach Chinese culture and language across the world.

Colleges would not be allowed to have academic relationships with universities in China, or with institutions located elsewhere but affiliated with the country.

Read other items in The Dismantling of DEI.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion Law & Policy Political Influence & Activism International
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Kate Marijolovic
Kate Marijolovic is a reporting intern at The Chronicle. Follow her on Twitter @kmarijolovic, or email her at kate.marijolovic@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Protesters attend a demonstration in support of Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil, March 10, 2025, in New York.
First-Amendment Rights
Noncitizen Professors Testify About Chilling Effect of Others’ Detentions
Photo-based illustration of a rock preciously suspended by a rope over three beakers.
Broken Promise
U.S. Policy Made America’s Research Engine the Envy of the World. One President Could End That.
lab-costs-promo.jpg
Research Expenses
What Does It Cost to Run a Lab?
Research illustration Microscope
Dreams Deferred
How Trump’s Cuts to Science Funding Are Derailing Young Scholars’ Careers

From The Review

Vector illustration of a suited man with a pair of scissors for a tie and an American flag button on his lapel.
The Review | Opinion
A Damaging Endowment Tax Crosses the Finish Line
By Phillip Levine
University of Virginia President Jim Ryan keeps his emotions in check during a news conference, Monday, Nov. 14, 2022 in Charlottesville. Va. Authorities say three people have been killed and two others were wounded in a shooting at the University of Virginia and a student is in custody. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)
The Review | Opinion
Jim Ryan’s Resignation Is a Warning
By Robert Zaretsky
Photo-based illustration depicting a close-up image of a mouth of a young woman with the letter A over the lips and grades in the background
The Review | Opinion
When Students Want You to Change Their Grades
By James K. Beggan

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin