Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    University Transformation
Sign In
Student Aid

Thousands of College Students Could Soon Lose Their Pell Grants

By Camila Gomez June 6, 2025
GarciaBudgets-0430.jpg
Illustration by The Chronicle; iStock

Last month, Russell Lowery-Hart, chancellor of Austin Community College District, in Texas, told a U.S. Senate committee that thousands of his students could lose some, if not all, of their financial aid.

Lowery-Hart was testifying about the harm he sees in lawmakers’ proposed changes to Pell Grants, which would cut out students if they aren’t taking enough credit hours. Over 70 percent of community-college students are enrolled part time, according to the

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Last month, Russell Lowery-Hart, chancellor of Austin Community College District, in Texas, told a U.S. Senate committee that thousands of his students could lose some, if not all, of their financial aid.

Lowery-Hart was testifying about the harm he sees in lawmakers’ proposed changes to Pell Grants, which would cut out students if they aren’t taking enough credit hours. Over 70 percent of community-college students are enrolled part time, according to the Department of Education.

Less than a day later, the U.S. House of Representatives voted to approve the “One Big Beautiful Bill” Act, the sweeping budget-reconciliation legislation, which includes reductions to Pell Grants. Now it’s in the Senate’s hands. Lowery-Hart said he hopes senators remember what he said. In his district, over 9,000 students would have their aid reduced. About 4,000 of them could lose all of it.

“We could have 10,000 of our 40,000 students in a semester disappear,” Lowery-Hart said in an interview. “And that’s just at Austin Community College.”

In order to receive a maximum Pell Grant award (currently set at $7,395), students have to take 24 credit hours per year, typically four full-length courses each semester. The bill would increase the credit hours to 30, or five courses. Take fewer courses than that, and the award gets reduced.

Students who drop below 15 credits per year — as is the case for many who are juggling work and caregiving responsibilities — won’t get Pell at all. Currently, students who take less than half of a full-time course load still receive aid, just a smaller amount.

The Senate hopes to pass the bill by July 4, a deadline imposed by President Trump. If the changes to Pell Grants are adopted, they would take effect in the summer of 2026.

The Trump administration also hopes to slash the maximum Pell award, cutting it to $5,710, according to a budget summary from the Department of Education.

Supporters of the Pell changes say they’re necessary to encourage students to graduate on time and to shore up the program’s budget. The Congressional Budget Office estimated that the program is facing a $2.7-billion shortfall.

Beth Akers, a senior fellow specializing in higher education at the American Enterprise Institute, a think tank, said limiting Pell eligibility could push students to finish their degrees. Akers said that when students are enrolled at a “faster pace,” it is more likely that they will graduate. She said she understands college leaders’ concerns about access, but she is “optimistic” about the changes.

That one change without significant guardrails around it has the potential to dramatically increase the cost of Pell over time and result in another shortfall.

“The confounding issue is that if we have a lot of people using Pell Grants to take part-time credits but then never complete a degree,” she said, “it may be better for them to not take those courses in the first place.”

Another factor driving the Pell reforms is that the Republicans’ bill aims to pay for tax cuts by cutting expenses and raising revenue elsewhere. The changes to what is considered full-time enrollment for Pell purposes would result in $7.1-billion worth of cost savings between 2025 and 2034, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Center for American Progress, a policy group, found that 1.4 million students across the country would completely lose their Pell Grants, while another three million would receive a decrease in aid of up to $1,480 annually.

Current numbers might not show the true impact of the changes, said Jinann Bitar, director of higher-education research and data analytics at EdTrust, an advocacy group.

Bitar said research into possible impacts provides only a “snapshot in time.” Most students don’t take on the same amount of credit hours every semester, she said, so if one student isn’t set to be affected one term, that student could still lose aid in another term.

“Any Pell student should be worried about the eligibility of their Pell dollars,” she said.

ADVERTISEMENT

In some ways, Republicans’ bill sends mixed messages to community colleges. The legislation also included a provision expanding the use of Pell for short-term work-force-training programs lasting between eight and 15 weeks, including those that aren’t formally accredited. Some of those work-force programs are run by two-year institutions.

Antoinette Flores, director of higher-education accountability and quality at New America, said she doesn’t think the benefits of increasing Pell for work-force training would offset the impact of the eligibility changes.

Flores added that this expansion, a policy known as “Workforce Pell,” could ultimately increase the spending lawmakers are trying to reduce. “That one change without significant guardrails around it has the potential to dramatically increase the cost of Pell over time and result in another shortfall,” she said.

David Baime, senior vice president for government relations at the American Association of Community Colleges, said local economies could also be affected if fewer students are able to get the aid they need to pursue high-demand degrees that prepare them for regional jobs.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The country would be undermining its economic strength by creating policies that will make it much more difficult for low-income students to access the type of education that will enable them to succeed economically,” Baime said.

Most students also can’t just simply increase their course load to meet the new requirements, Baime said, because of their other responsibilities.

At Northern Essex Community College, 78 percent of the students are enrolled part time, said Lane Glenn, the college’s president.

“The reason they’re part time is because some of them are raising children. They have multiple jobs that they have to have in order to put food on the table,” he said. “It’s a huge burden for students who were already underresourced.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Meanwhile, the financial hit to his institution would be substantial, Glenn said: a $5-million cut. And Northern Essex is not in a place financially to make up the difference.

A “drastic drop” in enrollment could mean that colleges might have to reduce staffing, eliminate degree offerings, and shutter buildings.

“It would be a radical transformation of how community colleges offer services,” he said.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Access & Affordability Law & Policy
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Camila-Gomez.png
About the Author
Camila Gomez
Camila Gomez is a reporter at The Chronicle. You can email her at camila.gomez@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Mangan-Censorship-0610.jpg
Academic Freedom
‘A Banner Year for Censorship’: More States Are Restricting Classroom Discussions on Race and Gender
On the day of his retirement party, Bob Morse poses for a portrait in the Washington, D.C., offices of U.S. News and World Report in June 2025. Morse led the magazine's influential and controversial college rankings efforts since its inception in 1988. Michael Theis, The Chronicle.
List Legacy
‘U.S. News’ Rankings Guru, Soon to Retire, Reflects on the Role He’s Played in Higher Ed
Black and white photo of the Morrill Hall building on the University of Minnesota campus with red covering one side.
Finance & operations
U. of Minnesota Tries to Soften the Blow of Tuition Hikes, Budget Cuts With Faculty Benefits
Photo illustration showing a figurine of a football player with a large price tag on it.
Athletics
Loans, Fees, and TV Money: Where Colleges Are Finding the Funds to Pay Athletes

From The Review

A stack of coins falling over. Motion blur. Falling economy concept. Isolated on white.
The Review | Opinion
Will We Get a More Moderate Endowment Tax?
By Phillip Levine
Photo illustration of a classical column built of paper, with colored wires overtaking it like vines of ivy
The Review | Essay
The Latest Awful EdTech Buzzword: “Learnings”
By Kit Nicholls
William F. Buckley, Jr.
The Review | Interview
William F. Buckley Jr. and the Origins of the Battle Against ‘Woke’
By Evan Goldstein

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: A Global Leadership Perspective
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin