Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
Point of View

To Craft Higher-Education Policy, Start by Finding the Facts

By William G. Bowen January 16, 2011
To Craft Higher-Education Policy, Start by Finding the Facts 1
Jon Krause for The Chronicle

I have often been asked what (if anything!) I have learned from my many years of experience as a university provost and president. In my attempt to answer that question, Lessons Learned: Reflections of a University President, a recurring theme is that on more than one occasion I failed to look closely enough at real evidence. I sometimes relied too much on what I assumed to be reality—or feared might be reality. I learned that it was easy to succumb to the temptation to believe what I wanted to believe or to accept at face value assertions made by others. There is simply no substitute for framing questions carefully and then looking with a cold eye at properly organized sets of facts. Let me give three examples, each relating to that bedrock function of any educational institution, the admissions process.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

I have often been asked what (if anything!) I have learned from my many years of experience as a university provost and president. In my attempt to answer that question, Lessons Learned: Reflections of a University President, a recurring theme is that on more than one occasion I failed to look closely enough at real evidence. I sometimes relied too much on what I assumed to be reality—or feared might be reality. I learned that it was easy to succumb to the temptation to believe what I wanted to believe or to accept at face value assertions made by others. There is simply no substitute for framing questions carefully and then looking with a cold eye at properly organized sets of facts. Let me give three examples, each relating to that bedrock function of any educational institution, the admissions process.

Affirmative action. I have been a vigorous advocate of affirmative action in admissions. In company with many others, I have believed that carefully constructed “holistic” admissions policies that take account of race—but without using quotas or mechanical formulas—could improve educational outcomes for all students by allowing individuals from different backgrounds to learn with and from one another. It has also been clear to me that the country badly needs the talents of its minority population. Moreover, the social fabric requires, in Justice Sandra Day O’Connor’s words, that “the path to leadership be visibly open to talented individuals of every race and ethnicity.”

But has affirmative action really worked? In the early years of minority recruitment at Princeton, I was reluctant to analyze data on educational outcomes for minority students because of a fear that the results would “look bad” or be misinterpreted. That was a mistake on my part. As the later findings in the book Derek Bok and I published in 1998 demonstrated, minority students at selective colleges and universities did just fine.

The extensive empirical research that Bok and I presented in The Shape of the River, alongside even more substantial evidence presented in other books, put a stake through the heart of what is sometimes called “the mismatch hypothesis,” which opponents of affirmative action have sometimes used to suggest that minority students are cajoled into attending schools for which they are unqualified and are, as a consequence, stigmatized, demoralized, and doomed to failure. The facts, when properly assembled, show that there is no truth to this allegation. On the contrary, the effects go entirely the other way around: Minority students with given qualifications have done better when they attended selective institutions, where many of their classmates had even stronger credentials, than they did when they attended less selective institutions. The facts are compelling, and it was gratifying to see this research cited in the Supreme Court decisions on the University of Michigan affirmative-action cases.

But no matter how minority students had performed, it would have been better to look directly at outcomes and acknowledge any shortcomings that were found, rather than to suggest by silence that maybe there really was something wrong. Daytime realities are almost never as bad as nightmares.

Early decision. During my years in the president’s office, I thought Princeton’s policy of need-blind admissions and its practice of offering enough financial aid to meet students’ full needs were effectively helping the school enroll students from all backgrounds and providing special consideration to students from modest circumstances. This turned out to be an optimistic assumption, in part because I, like many of my counterparts, misunderstood the degree of countervailing advantage that our schools were conferring on candidates who applied for “early admission.”

As the Harvard economics professor Chris Avery and his colleagues have demonstrated, that misunderstanding represented our failure to ask the right questions of the data. Evidence showing that average test scores and grades were roughly the same for students admitted “early” and students admitted in regular admissions rounds does not prove (as some of us believed) that students applying early received no advantage. Instead, the right question to ask is whether students of given qualifications who apply early have the same odds of being accepted as students with the same qualifications who apply in the regular round.

The answer is: They do not. Students applying early have far higher odds of being admitted than do similarly qualified students who apply in the regular round—the reason being that admission officers are admitting the “early applicants” from far smaller pools of similarly qualified candidates. The value of early-decision programs is even more questionable given that they inevitably favor applicants who are more knowledgeable about the process and who are well connected.

Athletic recruitment. As president of Princeton, I was at least dimly aware that there were problems with the ever-increasing intensity of athletic recruitment, even for athletes in the so-called minor sports, and even in colleges without big-time basketball and football programs. Many such colleges and universities admit large numbers of recruited athletes whose academic credentials do not measure up to those of their fellow students.

One of the mistakes I made in attempting to address this problem in the Ivy League was to put too much emphasis on the presumed curative powers of an “academic index” that focused on the academic qualifications of athletes when they are admitted. But, in fact, what is really important is the academic performance of athletes once they are in college.

ADVERTISEMENT

Evidence indicates that, in general, recruited athletes do even less well academically than one would expect them to do on the basis of their (below average) entering credentials. A far from inconsequential number of these students fail to take full advantage of the educational opportunities that they are offered. Research that Sarah Levin and I later carried out demonstrates that the root of the problem is not so much the time athletes spend practicing and playing as it is the recruitment process itself, and the interests and motivations of the different sets of students captured by it.

Other examples of assumptions that fail in the face of facts abound, as Lessons Learned illustrates. To be sure, some problems and some opportunities are unique to particular institutions, but many of the most important questions that present themselves are more common than not. And, as I now know, framing the right questions and seeking out the facts, while often difficult and sometimes awkward, ultimately pay big dividends.

Read other items in William G. Bowen on Higher Education.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Opinion
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Pro-Palestinian student protesters demonstrate outside Barnard College in New York on February 27, 2025, the morning after pro-Palestinian student protesters stormed a Barnard College building to protest the expulsion last month of two students who interrupted a university class on Israel. (Photo by TIMOTHY A. CLARY / AFP) (Photo by TIMOTHY A. CLARY/AFP via Getty Images)
Campus Activism
A College Vows to Stop Engaging With Some Student Activists to Settle a Lawsuit Brought by Jewish Students
LeeNIHGhosting-0709
Stuck in limbo
The Scientists Who Got Ghosted by the NIH
Protesters attend a demonstration in support of Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil, March 10, 2025, in New York.
First-Amendment Rights
Noncitizen Professors Testify About Chilling Effect of Others’ Detentions
Photo-based illustration of a rock preciously suspended by a rope over three beakers.
Broken Promise
U.S. Policy Made America’s Research Engine the Envy of the World. One President Could End That.

From The Review

Vector illustration of a suited man with a pair of scissors for a tie and an American flag button on his lapel.
The Review | Opinion
A Damaging Endowment Tax Crosses the Finish Line
By Phillip Levine
University of Virginia President Jim Ryan keeps his emotions in check during a news conference, Monday, Nov. 14, 2022 in Charlottesville. Va. Authorities say three people have been killed and two others were wounded in a shooting at the University of Virginia and a student is in custody. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)
The Review | Opinion
Jim Ryan’s Resignation Is a Warning
By Robert Zaretsky
Photo-based illustration depicting a close-up image of a mouth of a young woman with the letter A over the lips and grades in the background
The Review | Opinion
When Students Want You to Change Their Grades
By James K. Beggan

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin