> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
Research
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

To Curtail Violence, Researchers Say, Reduce Economic Inequality

By  Paul Basken
August 19, 2016
The most successful antiviolence programs identify problems down to the level of individuals and direct intensive resources at them, said Thomas Abt, a senior research fellow at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government.
Courtesy Thomas Abt
The most successful antiviolence programs identify problems down to the level of individuals and direct intensive resources at them, said Thomas Abt, a senior research fellow at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government.

Mass murder. Child abuse. Spousal battery. International conflict. Schoolyard bullying. Aggressive driving. Sexual assault. Police misconduct. Suicide.

They’re all forms of violent behavior, and they’ve all been the subject of study by university researchers trying to figure out how to reduce their incidence.

But do they have other significant traits in common? Might researchers find more success studying them collectively than by continuing to treat them individually?

The answer, according to some experts in the field, is a resounding “Yes, but.” That’s because reducing economic inequality, a widely recognized key to deterring various forms of violence, is largely outside the purview of researchers in the field.

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

Mass murder. Child abuse. Spousal battery. International conflict. Schoolyard bullying. Aggressive driving. Sexual assault. Police misconduct. Suicide.

They’re all forms of violent behavior, and they’ve all been the subject of study by university researchers trying to figure out how to reduce their incidence.

But do they have other significant traits in common? Might researchers find more success studying them collectively than by continuing to treat them individually?

The answer, according to some experts in the field, is a resounding “Yes, but.” That’s because reducing economic inequality, a widely recognized key to deterring various forms of violence, is largely outside the purview of researchers in the field.

“If we are looking for long-term, more or less permanent, solutions to the violence problem in the United States,” said Richard B. Rosenfeld, a professor of criminology and criminal justice at the University of Missouri at St. Louis, “then we have to be thinking about greatly expanded economic opportunities.”

ADVERTISEMENT

And if a coherent antiviolence strategy exists beyond the reduction of inequality, it’s the idea of thinking small: concentrating resources in limited areas, where the potential gains are most promising.

The big problem there, however, is that effective programs are costly and appear to benefit primarily the politically marginalized. That makes it tough to maintain funding for them, even when they show success.

“Sustainability is a real challenge,” said Thomas Abt, a senior research fellow and adjunct lecturer in public policy at the Center for International Development at Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government. “I don’t think there is any place that has been practicing focused deterrence without any interruption for 20 years.”

Boston is a chief example. After tallying 150 homicides a year in the early 1990s, the city used findings from federally funded research to create a program called Operation Ceasefire. It hired young adults to meet with gang members in violence-plagued neighborhoods to get them to the services they needed to turn their lives around.

The effort was a success, giving Boston an 18-month period without a single youth killed.

ADVERTISEMENT

Even so, the program then withered, as organizers moved on and attention waned. Homicides again rose. So in 2010 the city created a new program, this time called StreetSafe Boston, largely as an attempt to replicate the up-close-and-personal approach of Operation Ceasefire. Again violence rates fell.

Concentrated Attention

While frustrating, the experience nevertheless affirms that research does produce useful answers for reducing violence, and that those solutions require concentrated attention in specific high-need areas, Mr. Abt said.

Boston’s strategy, he said, stemmed from two key recognitions by researchers. First, 1 percent of youths aged 15 to 24 were responsible for more than 50 percent of all shootings across the city. Second, 70 percent of total shootings over a three-decade period took place in an area covering about 5 percent of the city.

Helping those people and areas — jobs, education, government services — is expensive but clearly works, Mr. Abt said. Yet programs that do that can quickly become victims of their own success, he said, as violence ebbs and others in the city begin questioning the financial outlays.

That basic experience has been repeated elsewhere, said Mr. Abt, who led a review that covered more than 1,400 antiviolence initiatives. The most successful programs, he found, identify problems down to the level of individual people and direct intensive resources at them, while stepping up enforcement and penalties for those who still refuse to abandon violent behavior.

ADVERTISEMENT

Criminology would be better off with more systematic and sustained attention to the big picture.

Other recognized examples of concentrating resources on leading incubators of violence include the Nurse-Family Partnership, a government-funded nonprofit group that gives expectant mothers from difficult backgrounds a nurse assistant and then counseling during their children’s infancy. The program pays for itself many times over, largely through eventually lower crime rates among their children, Mr. Abt said.

Researchers need to pay close attention to what the data show to be effective, Mr. Rosenfeld said. Then they must resist the temptation to hunt for alternative strategies that might satisfy policymakers operating on short-term reward systems, he said.

“I do not claim that knowledge of the cultural and social conditions that influence crime rates is to be preferred over knowledge of individuals and their immediate social settings,” he said in a 2010 speech as president of the American Society of Criminology. “I maintain simply that criminology would be better off with more systematic and sustained attention to the big picture.”

Another recognized expert on violence, Steven Pinker, a professor of psychology at Harvard, said he saw little value in trying to deal collectively with disparate types of violence. But even so, he said, there’s far too little cross-talk among researchers studying different kinds of violence. “Few authors or institutions do so at present,” he said. Studies assessing violence can be invaluable, he said, for calibrating responses that are based on the actual threats posed by each type.

Without better comparisons, he and other researchers said, policymakers and the public worry far too much about statistically low-level threats such as terrorism and mass shootings while paying too little attention to more common forms of violence, such as suicides and single-victim homicides.

ADVERTISEMENT

The police may not be able to directly prevent many homicides and suicides, Mr. Rosenfeld said. But reducing all kinds of violence and improving the public trust in the police through programs like StreetSafe Boston might, over time, make people less likely to feel the need to carry weapons or settle disputes with violence, he said.

Beyond that, he said, solving violence is a matter of economic commitment. And that must involve significant involvement from the public sector, because the private sector alone cannot create all the jobs that are needed.

“It’s a question of whether the will is there to do it,” Mr. Rosenfeld said of confronting violence holistically. “But jobs has to be at the top.”

Paul Basken covers university research and its intersection with government policy. He can be found on Twitter @pbasken, or reached by email at paul.basken@chronicle.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Download
  • Applying Research to Real-World Problems
A version of this article appeared in the September 2, 2016, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Scholarship & Research
Paul Basken
Paul Basken was a government policy and science reporter with The Chronicle of Higher Education, where he won an annual National Press Club award for exclusives.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

  • Applying Research to Real-World Problems
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin