Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
Sign In
Government

To the Relief of Academe, Deal Is Reached to End Federal Shutdown

By Kelly Field October 17, 2013
Under the bipartisan deal, reached by Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky (center), the minority leader, and Sen. Harry Reid of Nevada, the majority leader, spending on student aid, research, and other areas would remain flat, at last fiscal year’s levels.
Under the bipartisan deal, reached by Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky (center), the minority leader, and Sen. Harry Reid of Nevada, the majority leader, spending on student aid, research, and other areas would remain flat, at last fiscal year’s levels.Win McNamee, Getty Images
Washington

After weeks of bickering and brinkmanship, Congress has passed legislation to reopen the federal government and raise the nation’s borrowing limit, ending an impasse that disrupted research and education, and averting a debt crisis that could have devastated colleges and the economy at large.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

After weeks of bickering and brinkmanship, Congress has passed legislation to reopen the federal government and raise the nation’s borrowing limit, ending an impasse that disrupted research and education, and averting a debt crisis that could have devastated colleges and the economy at large.

The U.S. Senate passed the measure Wednesday evening, and the House of Representatives approved it a few hours later, despite opposition from a majority of that chamber’s Republicans. President Obama then signed the bill into law, restoring the flow of federal funds to students and researchers, and allowing the reopening of the National Archives and other government facilities that academic researchers depend on.

Most important, the measure prevents a national default that could have caused interest rates on student loans to soar and spending on student aid and research to slow or even stop.

But the legislation provides only a temporary reprieve, setting the stage for another showdown early next year. In the meantime, spending on student aid and research will remain flat, at last fiscal year’s levels.

Much of the federal government closed for business on October 1, after lawmakers failed to reach agreement on a spending bill for the 2014 fiscal year. Conservative lawmakers had insisted that any spending measure repeal, or at least delay, President Obama’s signature health-care law and that any increase in the debt ceiling be offset with spending cuts.

The deal rejects those conditions in favor of a mostly “clean” measure sought by Democrats and Mr. Obama. It finances federal agencies through mid-January and extends the nation’s borrowing authority through February 7, while setting up budget negotiations between the House and Senate on a 10-year budget blueprint. In a concession to conservatives, the measure strengthens income-verification procedures for government health-care subsidies.

The last-minute agreement came together on the day before the U.S. Treasury said it would reach its legal borrowing limit. If that had happened, the government would have quickly run out of cash, and would have had to pick and choose which bills to pay and which grants to make. Student aid and research grants probably would not have risen to the top of the priority list.

The end of the stalemate came as a relief for researchers who had been shut out of government facilities and had seen their grant applications delayed. It was also good news for members of the military, who hadn’t been able to receive tuition-assistance benefits since the shutdown began, and for the Merchant Marine Academy, which had been closed for more than two weeks.

But colleges won’t be in the clear despite the shutdown’s end. Student-aid and research funds will continue to be squeezed by budget constraints and the next round of the across-the-board “sequester” spending cuts, scheduled to take effect in mid-January. And lawmakers looking for places to cut in their 10-year budget blueprint may find higher education a softer target than the major entitlement programs, warned Neil H. Buchanan, a professor of law at George Washington University and the author of The Debt Ceiling Disasters.

“They’re going to find it hard to take whacks at the big programs,” like Medicare and Social Security, he said, “so they’ll start looking at symbolic ways to cut away at things that are easier.”

“Other than football teams,” he observed, “universities are not popular with tea-party-type voters.”

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Law & Policy Political Influence & Activism
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Kelly Field
Kelly Field joined The Chronicle of Higher Education in 2004 and covered federal higher-education policy. She continues to write for The Chronicle on a freelance basis.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Illustration of a magnifying glass highlighting the phrase "including the requirements set forth in Presidential Executive Order 14168 titled Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government."
Policy 'Whiplash'
Research Grants Increasingly Require Compliance With Trump’s Orders. Here’s How Colleges Are Responding.
Photo illustration showing internal email text snippets over a photo of a University of Iowa campus quad
Red-state reticence
Facing Research Cuts, Officials at U. of Iowa Spoke of a ‘Limited Ability to Publicly Fight This’
Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues

From The Review

Football game between UCLA and Colorado University, at Folsom Field in Boulder, Colo., Sept. 24, 2022.
The Review | Opinion
My University Values Football More Than Education
By Sigman Byrd
Photo- and type-based illustration depicting the acronym AAUP with the second A as the arrow of a compass and facing not north but southeast.
The Review | Essay
The Unraveling of the AAUP
By Matthew W. Finkin
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome propped on a stick attached to a string, like a trap.
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Can’t Trust the Federal Government. What Now?
By Brian Rosenberg

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin