Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
News

U. of Pennsylvania Absolves Psychiatry Chairman of Ghostwriting Complaint

By Paul Basken February 29, 2012
Amy Gutmann, president of the U. of Pennsylvania, was chairman of the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues while the university reviewed a ghostwriting complaint against the chairman of its psychiatry department.
Amy Gutmann, president of the U. of Pennsylvania, was chairman of the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues while the university reviewed a ghostwriting complaint against the chairman of its psychiatry department.Rice U.

The University of Pennsylvania has concluded that the chairman of its psychiatry department and a colleague let their names be listed among the authors reviewing a medicine in a journal article that was actually written by the drug’s manufacturer.

The university, however, has decided to take no punitive action against the chairman, Dwight L. Evans, and an associate professor of psychiatry, Laszlo Gyulai, for the 2001 article in The American Journal of Psychiatry. Penn noted that the article was published before new university rules and journal standards expressly forbidding ghostwriting went into effect.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

The University of Pennsylvania has concluded that the chairman of its psychiatry department and a colleague let their names be listed among the authors reviewing a medicine in a journal article that was actually written by the drug’s manufacturer.

The university, however, has decided to take no punitive action against the chairman, Dwight L. Evans, and an associate professor of psychiatry, Laszlo Gyulai, for the 2001 article in The American Journal of Psychiatry. Penn noted that the article was published before new university rules and journal standards expressly forbidding ghostwriting went into effect.

The actions by Dr. Evans and Dr. Gyulai did not constitute “a deviation from accepted practices as they were understood at the time,” Susan E. Phillips, a spokeswoman for the university’s medical school, told The Chronicle in a written statement.

The university reached the decision after an internal investigation of several months that followed a complaint against Dr. Evans and Dr. Gyulai by a fellow professor of psychiatry at the medical school, Jay D. Amsterdam. The federal government’s Office of Research Integrity is now reviewing what action it might take in the case.

The matter is among a series of high-profile ghostwriting allegations in recent years, prompted in many instances by lawsuits from patients who claim harm from a medical treatment and then work to trace the chain of research that led to professional acceptance of a particular drug or device.

Ethics experts outside the University of Pennsylvania acknowledged the toughening of rules in recent years but questioned the degree to which that should absolve a case of ghostwriting. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, which sets authorship guidelines, revised its rules in 2009 to make clear that listed authors should have made “substantive intellectual contributions” to an article. The University of Pennsylvania also has tightened its authorship rules since Amy Gutmann became its president, in 2004.

Those revisions mean authors writing in 2001 were subject to different rules than would be applied now, said Lisa S. Lehmann, an assistant professor of medicine and medical ethics at Harvard University. “On some level,” she said of the university’s rationale, “there is some truth to that.”

Yet written rules might not be the only standard that could be applied, said Dr. Lehmann, who serves as director of the Center for Bioethics at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. Dr. Lehmann said she was not familiar with the details of the University of Pennsylvania case and could not comment directly on it. But she said students in grade school are taught the basic ethics of plagiarism. Even before the rule changes in recent years, she said, “there’s some common-sense expectations about what it means to put your name on a paper.”

Dr. Lehmann’s counterpart at the University of Pennsylvania, Arthur L. Caplan, said he doesn’t comment on colleagues at Penn. But Mr. Caplan, a professor of medical ethics and director of the Center for Bioethics at Penn, spoke out against ghostwriting as early as 1999. A reader “has a right to expect that the person whose name is on an article in a scientific journal is the person who wrote it,” he said in a report in a July 1999 issue of The Lancet.

A Call for Common Sense

In this instance, Dr. Amsterdam said his complaint had been motivated by his exclusion from the published study even though he felt he had initiated the research project. He produced e-mails and other documents showing that the June 2001 article in The American Journal of Psychiatry, which he described as overstating the benefits and understating the risks of the antidepressant drug Paxil, had largely been produced by GlaxoSmithKline, the maker of Paxil.

ADVERTISEMENT

The journal article listed eight authors. The first five were university researchers, including Dr. Evans and Dr. Gyulai. The last three were employees of a medical-communications company hired by GlaxoSmithKline, whose affiliation was not stated.

The article has been cited hundreds of times in other journal articles, Dr. Amsterdam said in a complaint to the Office of Research Integrity. Eliot L. Spitzer, while serving as New York’s attorney general, reached a legal settlement with GlaxoSmithKline over his contention that the company had engaged in a series of such attempts to market the drug and play down its negative effects on children, including a possible increase in suicidal acts.

Neither Dr. Evans nor Dr. Gyulai responded to requests for comment. The Project on Government Oversight, a nonpartisan watchdog group, called last summer for Ms. Gutmann to step down from her role as chairman of the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues until she resolved the ghostwriting allegations against Dr. Evans and Dr. Gyulai. The group also cited evidence that Dr. Evans was involved in a separate ghostwriting episode in 2003.

Ms. Gutmann declined to resign, and the Obama administration last month appointed her to a new term as chairman of the bioethics panel, which recently spent several months evaluating the ethics of American doctors who intentionally infected hundreds of people in Guatemala with gonorrhea and syphilis as part of a public-health experiment in the 1940s. Asked this week outside a conference in Houston about the university’s handling of Dr. Evans, Ms. Gutmann walked away, referring the matter to a spokeswoman.

ADVERTISEMENT

The university’s vice president for communications, Stephen J. MacCarthy, later issued a written response in which he said Ms. Gutmann had no involvement in reviewing the case against Dr. Evans. Mr. MacCarthy also noted that new university rules require the acknowledgment of the assistance of an outside writer.

“But that wasn’t the case when this paper was written, and the university simply cannot punish someone when they complied with the rules that were in place at the time,” he said. “It would be like giving someone a traffic ticket for running a red light 10 years ago when there was no stop light until years later.”

A lawyer for Dr. Amsterdam, Bijan Esfandiari, said Penn’s conclusion defies common sense, given warnings against ghostwriting by Mr. Caplan and others well before 2001. Mr. Esfandiari said he was preparing “a detailed point-by-point response” for presentation to the Office of Research Integrity and to a U.S. Senate committee investigating the matter. A spokeswoman for the federal office said she could not comment on the status of any investigation in progress.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Law & Policy
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Paul Basken Bio
About the Author
Paul Basken
Paul Basken was a government policy and science reporter with The Chronicle of Higher Education, where he won an annual National Press Club award for exclusives.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Vector illustration of large open scissors  with several workers in seats dangling by white lines
Iced Out
Duke Administrators Accused of Bypassing Shared-Governance Process in Offering Buyouts
Illustration showing money being funnelled into the top of a microscope.
'A New Era'
Higher-Ed Associations Pitch an Alternative to Trump’s Cap on Research Funding
Illustration showing classical columns of various heights, each turning into a stack of coins
Endowment funds
The Nation’s Wealthiest Small Colleges Just Won a Big Tax Exemption
WASHINGTON, DISTICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES - 2025/04/14: A Pro-Palestinian demonstrator holding a sign with Release Mahmud Khalil written on it, stands in front of the ICE building while joining in a protest. Pro-Palestinian demonstrators rally in front of the ICE building, demanding freedom for Mahmoud Khalil and all those targeted for speaking out against genocide in Palestine. Protesters demand an end to U.S. complicity and solidarity with the resistance in Gaza. (Photo by Probal Rashid/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Campus Activism
An Anonymous Group’s List of Purported Critics of Israel Helped Steer a U.S. Crackdown on Student Activists

From The Review

John T. Scopes as he stood before the judges stand and was sentenced, July 2025.
The Review | Essay
100 Years Ago, the Scopes Monkey Trial Discovered Academic Freedom
By John K. Wilson
Vector illustration of a suited man with a pair of scissors for a tie and an American flag button on his lapel.
The Review | Opinion
A Damaging Endowment Tax Crosses the Finish Line
By Phillip Levine
University of Virginia President Jim Ryan keeps his emotions in check during a news conference, Monday, Nov. 14, 2022 in Charlottesville. Va. Authorities say three people have been killed and two others were wounded in a shooting at the University of Virginia and a student is in custody. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)
The Review | Opinion
Jim Ryan’s Resignation Is a Warning
By Robert Zaretsky

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin