Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
International

U.S. Department of Justice Ends Controversial Probe of Researchers’ China Ties

By Karin Fischer February 23, 2022
Many American and Chinese national flags together
iStock

The U.S. Department of Justice is ending a Trump-era investigation of national-security threats from China following several failed prosecutions of American university researchers for their ties to China.

Matthew Olsen, assistant attorney general for national security, announced the end of the

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

The U.S. Department of Justice is ending a Trump-era investigation of national-security threats from China following several failed prosecutions of American university researchers for their ties to China.

Matthew Olsen, assistant attorney general for national security, announced the end of the China Initiative in a speech Wednesday afternoon at George Mason University, saying that it “fueled a narrative of intolerance and bias.”

“While I remain focused on the evolving, significant threat that the government of China poses,” Olsen said, “I have concluded that this initiative is not the right approach.” Instead, he said the U.S. government must take a “broader approach” to protect know-how and intellectual property from foreign governments, including China, Iran, and Russia, that seek to poach American innovation.

In his remarks, Olsen acknowledged that the government probe of academic and espionage had taken a particular toll on American higher education and on scientists of Chinese and Asian descent. “We have heard that these prosecutions — and the public narrative they create — can lead to a chilling atmosphere for scientists and scholars that damages the scientific enterprise in this country,” he said.

“Safeguarding the integrity and transparency of research institutions is a matter of national security. But so is ensuring that we continue to attract the best and the brightest researchers and scholars to our country from all around the world — and that we all continue to honor our tradition of academic openness and collaboration.”

Higher-education, civil-rights, and Asian American groups had pushed for a reconsideration of the China Initiative, and Olsen had begun a review when he took office in the fall.

The Trump administration started the China Initiative in November 2018, an effort to root out espionage by the Chinese government.

From the outset, public officials singled out American universities as particularly vulnerable to Chinese influence. “What more bad decisions will schools make because they are hooked on Chinese Communist Party cash?” said Michael Pompeo, then-secretary of state, in a December 2020 speech at Georgia Tech. “What professors will they be able to co-opt or to silence? What theft and espionage will [universities] simply overlook?”

But the actual indictments brought against American researchers and visiting scholars were unrelated to spying. Instead, the prosecutions focused on academics’ failure to disclose Chinese ties to federal grant-making agencies or universities, making false statements to government authorities, and tax and visa fraud.

ADVERTISEMENT

In many cases, the charges did not stick. In recent months, prosecutions have been dismissed against a half-dozen researchers, most notably against Gang Chen, a mechanical-engineering professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology whom prosecutors alleged had taken millions of dollars from a Chinese university. But L. Rafael Reif, MIT’s president, had clarified that the funds had gone to the university as part of an institutional project with a Chinese partner. Chen’s colleagues signed a statement accusing the government of trying to criminalize routine academic collaboration. “We are all Gang Chen,” they wrote.

In asking a federal judge to drop the charges, Rachael S. Rollins, the U.S. district attorney in Boston, said that “after careful assessment … our office has concluded that we can no longer meet our burden of proof at trial.”

In another high-profile case, a judge acquitted Anming Hu, a researcher at the University of Tennessee at Knoxville, writing that “no rational jury” could conclude Hu intended to defraud NASA by hiding his ties to China. Testimony in Hu’s trial showed that federal investigators had pressed the university to cooperate despite a lack of evidence against the mechanical-engineering professor.

Federal prosecutors did record one conviction, against Charles M. Lieber, a Harvard University professor whom FBI agents caught on tape admitting that he had been “dishonest” and not “completely transparent” about his ties and financial affiliations with a Chinese university and Chinese-government foreign-talent recruitment program.

ADVERTISEMENT

But Lieber’s case was an aberration not simply because of his conviction — for one, he was the rare white researcher charged. Nearly nine in 10 China Initiative cases had been brought against people of Chinese descent, according to an analysis by the MIT Technology Review.

The three-year investigation has had an impact on scientists of Chinese and Asian descent. An October 2021 survey by the University of Arizona and the Committee of 100 found that half of Chinese and Chinese American scientists at American research universities reported feeling “considerable fear or anxiety” that they were being “surveilled” by the U.S. government.

The chill risks freezing the talent pipeline into American colleges, laboratories, and high-tech start-ups. Another survey, by the American Physical Society, found that 43 percent of international graduate students and early-career scientists in physics currently in the United States perceive this country to be unwelcoming to international students and scholars.

Frank H. Wu, president of City University of New York Queens College and a legal scholar, called the Justice Department announcement “necessary but not sufficient.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“All but extremists know well enough to say they’re against racial profiling,” Wu said. “In this area, because even Asian American native-born citizens are assumed to be perpetual foreigners, some folks have been open in expressing racial prejudice. They have generalized about all people of a background being spies or sleeper agents. So saying we’re not racists and denying there is racial profiling is nice. But it isn’t enough.”

Sarah Spreitzer, assistant vice president for government relations at the American Council on Education, said the end of the China Initiative was “welcome news” that brings the Justice Department “more in line” with other federal agencies in terms of policies for research transparency and integrity.

Spreitzer noted that the White House recently issued research-security guidance laying out and standardizing disclosure requirements for universities and scientists receiving federal grants, including contracts, funding, and other ties from overseas entities.

Although the China Initiative is ending, the White House guidelines are a reminder that university researchers, particularly those who undertake international academic collaborations, will continue to operate in an environment of heightened scrutiny.

In his remarks, Olsen did not take the option of prosecutions off the table in certain cases. However, he said the Justice Department would work with other agencies to pursue civil or administrative remedies and penalties.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
International Political Influence & Activism Scholarship & Research
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Fischer_Karin.jpg
About the Author
Karin Fischer
Karin Fischer writes about international education and the economic, cultural, and political divides around American colleges. She’s on the social-media platform X @karinfischer, and her email address is karin.fischer@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Vector illustration of large open scissors  with several workers in seats dangling by white lines
Iced Out
Duke Administrators Accused of Bypassing Shared-Governance Process in Offering Buyouts
Illustration showing money being funnelled into the top of a microscope.
'A New Era'
Higher-Ed Associations Pitch an Alternative to Trump’s Cap on Research Funding
Illustration showing classical columns of various heights, each turning into a stack of coins
Endowment funds
The Nation’s Wealthiest Small Colleges Just Won a Big Tax Exemption
WASHINGTON, DISTICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES - 2025/04/14: A Pro-Palestinian demonstrator holding a sign with Release Mahmud Khalil written on it, stands in front of the ICE building while joining in a protest. Pro-Palestinian demonstrators rally in front of the ICE building, demanding freedom for Mahmoud Khalil and all those targeted for speaking out against genocide in Palestine. Protesters demand an end to U.S. complicity and solidarity with the resistance in Gaza. (Photo by Probal Rashid/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Campus Activism
An Anonymous Group’s List of Purported Critics of Israel Helped Steer a U.S. Crackdown on Student Activists

From The Review

John T. Scopes as he stood before the judges stand and was sentenced, July 2025.
The Review | Essay
100 Years Ago, the Scopes Monkey Trial Discovered Academic Freedom
By John K. Wilson
Vector illustration of a suited man with a pair of scissors for a tie and an American flag button on his lapel.
The Review | Opinion
A Damaging Endowment Tax Crosses the Finish Line
By Phillip Levine
University of Virginia President Jim Ryan keeps his emotions in check during a news conference, Monday, Nov. 14, 2022 in Charlottesville. Va. Authorities say three people have been killed and two others were wounded in a shooting at the University of Virginia and a student is in custody. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)
The Review | Opinion
Jim Ryan’s Resignation Is a Warning
By Robert Zaretsky

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin