Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    University Transformation
Sign In
Funds for Research

UConn Says It’s Repurposing Sackler Donations. What Does That Mean?

By Francie Diep November 6, 2019
Bruce Mayer and Kazuya Machida, who study cell signaling in cancer at the U. of Connecticut, learned that their lab would lose its longtime Sackler funding. “I understand the political situation,” Mayer said, “but it’s going to have a negative impact on my lab, and that’s unfortunate.”
Bruce Mayer and Kazuya Machida, who study cell signaling in cancer at the U. of Connecticut, learned that their lab would lose its longtime Sackler funding. “I understand the political situation,” Mayer said, “but it’s going to have a negative impact on my lab, and that’s unfortunate.”James Bliss for UConn Health Center

Bruce Mayer learned that he was losing his research endowment by hearing about it on the radio on his way home from work one drizzly Wednesday in October. By that time, both The Chronicle and the Associated Press had reported the news: The University of Connecticut was rerouting nearly all unspent donations from Raymond and Beverly Sackler to addiction research and education.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Bruce Mayer and Kazuya Machida, who study cell signaling in cancer at the U. of Connecticut, learned that their lab would lose its longtime Sackler funding. “I understand the political situation,” Mayer said, “but it’s going to have a negative impact on my lab, and that’s unfortunate.”
Bruce Mayer and Kazuya Machida, who study cell signaling in cancer at the U. of Connecticut, learned that their lab would lose its longtime Sackler funding. “I understand the political situation,” Mayer said, “but it’s going to have a negative impact on my lab, and that’s unfortunate.”James Bliss for UConn Health Center

Bruce Mayer learned that he was losing his research endowment by hearing about it on the radio on his way home from work one drizzly Wednesday in October. By that time, both The Chronicle and the Associated Press had reported the news: The University of Connecticut was rerouting nearly all unspent donations from Raymond and Beverly Sackler to addiction research and education.

Mayer, a professor of genetics and genome sciences at UConn, studies cell signaling in cancer. He had received regular payouts from a Sackler-funded endowment for nearly two decades. On average, he would get about $25,000 a year, he said. It was money he could use for whatever his lab happened to need. “I understand the political situation,” he said, “but it’s going to have a negative impact on my lab, and that’s unfortunate.”

Like other institutions across the country, UConn is grappling with what to do with donations it received from members of the Sackler family, who are being blamed in lawsuits for starting and profiting from an epidemic of opioid addiction in America. The university received about $4.5 million from Raymond and Beverly Sackler from 1985 to 2014, for arts programs and scientific research unrelated to pain treatment or addiction.

Although Raymond died in 2017 and Beverly last month, several Sackler endowments continue to make money for UConn. After The Chronicle spoke with Sackler beneficiaries at the university in October, UConn announced the repurposing plan, which falls in line with what some philosophers say is the best use for morally troubled donations: fixing problems the money created.

But the way repurposing has played out reveals how messy it can be, in practice, to scrub a donation’s controversial origins. What happens to the funds’ current beneficiaries? To what extent do they deserve a say in what happens to the money — or even a warning of what’s to come?

‘Do Not Spend’

The University Senate’s executive committee had voted in March to “request that the university Board of Trustees remove the Sackler name from all facilities, titles, and programs,” and to recommend that the remaining Sackler money go to anti-addiction projects. The senate debated whether the university should seek the consent of current recipients of Sackler endowments.

According to the meeting’s minutes, some members argued that the senate could not, and should not, be able to take away a department’s funding without permission. Others argued that the senate was well within its rights to suggest such a move. “We are speaking for the university and must stand for the moral and ethical integrity of the university,” one senator, Veronica Makowsky, a professor of English, was quoted as saying.

University officials had talked with “about half” of the Sackler recipients and didn’t get pushback to the idea of repurposing the money, the March minutes said.

The senate chose not to specify whether officials should get permission for repurposing from Sackler beneficiaries, said Hedley C. Freake, the committee’s chair.

University leaders agreed that rerouting the money was the best choice, and then froze the funds, said a spokesman, Mike Enright. One recipient, however, reported to The Chronicle in October that she could still see the funds in her computer system.

ADVERTISEMENT

UConn’s leaders are in talks with members of the Sackler family, whose permission they need, legally, to change where the money goes.

Nearly a month after the public decision was made, two beneficiaries of Sackler endowments say that no university official has spoken with them about ending their endowments. Their only notice? A note in their regular financial statements saying, “Do not spend.” The statements came out weeks after the public announcement.

Despite the senate’s vote, Stormy J. Chamberlain, a geneticist who studies rare diseases, wrote in an email: “I haven’t been told to stop using the ‘Sackler Associate Professor’ title. There has been no clear communication from the university about this.”

“Seems like everybody’s afraid to go on the record, so to speak,” Mayer said. “It’s irritating.”

ADVERTISEMENT

According to Freake, the senate-committee chair, Chamberlain and Mayer should have been notified. Officials of the UConn Foundation, the university’s primary fund-raising body, “attempted to talk to the faculty,” he said. “Whether they got a response or not is something else.”

Two beneficiaries of Sackler endowments at UConn didn’t agree to be interviewed about what’s happened since the university’s repurposing announcement. Glenn Mitoma is director of the Thomas J. Dodd Research Center on human rights, which used to host the annual Sackler Lecture Series. He didn’t return a call or an email.

Anne D’Alleva, dean of the School of Fine Arts, where the Sacklers funded an artist-in-residence program and a music-composition prize, referred The Chronicle to Enright. Because the University Senate’s resolution in March allows for Sackler money to go to arts-and-humanities programs “that deal with the effects of drug addiction,” it seems possible that Mitoma’s and D’Alleva’s departments may not entirely lose that funding. But Enright couldn’t confirm in time whether that was true.

Both Chamberlain and Mayer were disappointed with the university’s decision. Mayer said his Sackler funds, which supported his lab’s cancer research, were “being used for a good purpose.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“It’s a shame that the money may be rerouted to a program that isn’t well thought-out just because of appearances,” Chamberlain wrote. “Don’t forget that this money was given to the recipients for research merit.”

She said she would prefer that the university stop taking additional Sackler money and remove the Sackler name, but not redirect the funds.

Francie Diep is a staff reporter covering money in higher ed. Follow her on Twitter @franciediep, or email her at francie.diep@chronicle.com.


We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Scholarship & Research Finance & Operations
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
IMG_0023-removebg.png
About the Author
Francie Diep
Francie Diep is a senior reporter covering money in higher education. Email her at francie.diep@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

Universities Cut More Ties With Donors Who Grew Rich on Painkillers
Tufts Will Investigate Its Ties to the Sackler Family. Here’s What Other Universities Are Doing.

More News

Illustration showing the logos of Instragram, X, and TikTok being watch by a large digital eyeball
Race against the clock
Could New Social-Media Screening Create a Student-Visa Bottleneck?
Mangan-Censorship-0610.jpg
Academic Freedom
‘A Banner Year for Censorship’: More States Are Restricting Classroom Discussions on Race and Gender
On the day of his retirement party, Bob Morse poses for a portrait in the Washington, D.C., offices of U.S. News and World Report in June 2025. Morse led the magazine's influential and controversial college rankings efforts since its inception in 1988. Michael Theis, The Chronicle.
List Legacy
‘U.S. News’ Rankings Guru, Soon to Retire, Reflects on the Role He’s Played in Higher Ed
Black and white photo of the Morrill Hall building on the University of Minnesota campus with red covering one side.
Finance & operations
U. of Minnesota Tries to Soften the Blow of Tuition Hikes, Budget Cuts With Faculty Benefits

From The Review

A stack of coins falling over. Motion blur. Falling economy concept. Isolated on white.
The Review | Opinion
Will We Get a More Moderate Endowment Tax?
By Phillip Levine
Photo illustration of a classical column built of paper, with colored wires overtaking it like vines of ivy
The Review | Essay
The Latest Awful Ed-Tech Buzzword: “Learnings”
By Kit Nicholls
William F. Buckley, Jr.
The Review | Interview
William F. Buckley Jr. and the Origins of the Battle Against ‘Woke’
By Evan Goldstein

Upcoming Events

07-16-Advising-InsideTrack - forum assets v1_Plain.png
The Evolving Work of College Advising
Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin