Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
News

Universities Are Hopeful as U.S. Considers New Rules for Grant Reimbursement

By Paul Basken December 4, 2011

Revisions in federal rules defining how universities get reimbursed for scientific-grant expenses could soon bring relief to thousands of researchers involved in billions of dollars in government-sponsored research.

Universities have a lot not to like about the rules, published in a document known as Circular A-21, or at least about the way they’re being interpreted now. Much of the trouble stems from the simple fact that the federal budget is being cut. Because of that, many of the agencies that distribute federal research money, like the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation, are said to be coming up with creative ways of sidestepping the reimbursement rules and reducing the amount of money they spend on each grant.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Revisions in federal rules defining how universities get reimbursed for scientific-grant expenses could soon bring relief to thousands of researchers involved in billions of dollars in government-sponsored research.

Universities have a lot not to like about the rules, published in a document known as Circular A-21, or at least about the way they’re being interpreted now. Much of the trouble stems from the simple fact that the federal budget is being cut. Because of that, many of the agencies that distribute federal research money, like the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation, are said to be coming up with creative ways of sidestepping the reimbursement rules and reducing the amount of money they spend on each grant.

And another problem, perhaps even bigger, is that the federal government keeps adding to the list of regulations it imposes on universities and their researchers—in areas such as export controls, human-subject protection, and financial conflicts of interest—and the rules don’t allow any corresponding increase in payments for the administrative staff required to comply.

“The increasing regulatory burdens have been killing us,” said Tobin L. Smith, vice president for policy at the Association of American Universities.

The AAU and the Council on Governmental Relations, both associations of research universities, produced a report this summer offering examples. They include a private institution in the Midwest that estimated its administrative costs for sponsored research increased from $4.2-million in 2002 to $7.3-million in 2008, and a leading medical school in the Southeast that reported that its compliance and quality-assurance costs went up from about $3-million in 2000 to $12.5-million in 2010.

The hope for relief is coming from the White House’s Office of Management and Budget, which enforces the reimbursement rules. The budget office assigned a panel in June to consider changes in the rules, and OMB is set to announce its revisions early next year.

The panel has been deliberating in private, but university lobbyists are optimistic. One positive sign, Mr. Smith said, is the expedited pace of the process from an administration that has promised to tackle regulatory burdens governmentwide. Another encouraging indicator, he said, was a recent meeting with university lobby groups where the three co-chairs of the OMB panel made clear their strong understanding of and appreciation for university concerns.

A Plea for Consistency

With universities, their researchers, and state and federal governments all trying to make do with less money, there may be some practical limits to what the review panel can accomplish for cash-strapped institutions.

Recognizing that, the AAU and the Association of Public and Land-Grant Universities, at the top of a list of 20 priorities they set out for the review panel, pleaded for agencies such as the NIH and NSF to at least show more consistency in how they apply the reimbursement rules.

The government’s standard policy is that each university is entitled to a payment for “indirect costs,” covering facilities and administrative expenses, with each grant won by a faculty member. That amount is negotiated with each university, based on its historical costs of operation.

ADVERTISEMENT

For instance, if a university gets a rate of 52 percent, and a researcher there wins a $100,000 grant from the NSF, the NSF would provide an additional $52,000 to the university to cover overhead costs, such as fire and police protection, and the salaries of administrators. The additional amount might be even less than $52,000, however, since the reimbursement rules forbid counting some costs in the main part of the grant toward the indirect portion.

And the two university associations, along with the Council on Governmental Relations, have complained about an increasing number of instances of agencies tweaking their reimbursement formulas to even further reduce the amounts paid toward indirect costs.

They cite examples such as the NIH’s announcement in May 2010 that it would limit payments for genomic arrays, which are prepackaged kits for analyzing genetic materials. The NIH argues that such tools are unusually expensive, and that its policy on genomic arrays complied with the rules. The universities contend that both high- and low-cost items are factored into each university’s reimbursement rate, and that case-by-case exceptions such as genomic arrays appear designed to stretch government budgets.

“It does make research dollars go farther,” Mr. Smith said. “But it does put the burden back on universities.” And with public institutions facing state budget cuts and private institutions suffering endowment shortfalls, the cost shifting will eventually hit tuition, university administrators warn.

Inevitable Cuts

Even if the rules are made fairer and clearer, however, cuts in indirect-cost payments appear inevitable. The director of the National Institutes of Health, Francis S. Collins, has said he agrees that current federal spending on indirect costs is excessive and has led to cases of overgrown research facilities.

ADVERTISEMENT

Arthur I. Bienenstock, special assistant to the president for federal research policy at Stanford University, sees the same basic problem but places the responsibility more with the government. Congress doubled spending for the NIH over a five-year period beginning in the George W. Bush administration, and then added another $10-billion with the 2009 stimulus measure. It also approved plans to double the NSF budget, before backing off in recent years.

It’s only natural, said Mr. Bienenstock, who served as a White House science adviser in the Clinton administration, that universities began building their research capacity as a result of such promises. “It was clearly a national priority,” he said.

If Congress no longer has the money to sustain those ambitions, the government could at least help universities by reducing regulatory burdens, including the much-despised “effort reporting” provisions that require researchers to carefully tally the hours they spend on each grant, the AAU and APLU argued.

Other requests by the AAU and APLU include letting researchers charge some of their own administrative costs to their portion of the grant award, so that they can hire less-costly assistants rather than do so much administrative work themselves. The groups also asked OMB to consider extending to all universities a policy that now lets a small group of institutions charge higher indirect costs based on the recognition that research facilities generally incur higher utility costs than other campus buildings.

“We asked for a whole bunch of things,” knowing universities probably wouldn’t get them all, Mr. Smith said, referring to the AAU-APLU list of 20 suggested changes in reimbursement policies. “If we got 20 percent of the things that were in our letter, I think we’d consider this a success.”

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Law & Policy Political Influence & Activism
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Paul Basken Bio
About the Author
Paul Basken
Paul Basken was a government policy and science reporter with The Chronicle of Higher Education, where he won an annual National Press Club award for exclusives.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Brad Wolverton
Newsroom leadership
The Chronicle of Higher Education Names Brad Wolverton as Editor
Vector illustration of large open scissors  with several workers in seats dangling by white lines
Iced Out
The Death of Shared Governance
Illustration showing money being funnelled into the top of a microscope.
'A New Era'
Higher-Ed Associations Pitch an Alternative to Trump’s Cap on Research Funding
Illustration showing classical columns of various heights, each turning into a stack of coins
Endowment funds
The Nation’s Wealthiest Small Colleges Just Won a Big Tax Exemption

From The Review

Illustration of an ocean tide shaped like Donald Trump about to wash away sandcastles shaped like a college campus.
The Review | Essay
Why Universities Are So Powerless in Their Fight Against Trump
By Jason Owen-Smith
Photo-based illustration of a closeup of a pencil meshed with a circuit bosrd
The Review | Essay
How Are Students Really Using AI?
By Derek O'Connell
John T. Scopes as he stood before the judges stand and was sentenced, July 2025.
The Review | Essay
100 Years Ago, the Scopes Monkey Trial Discovered Academic Freedom
By John K. Wilson

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin