Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    University Transformation
Sign In
Research

Universities Yelp as Elsevier Pulls Back on Free Access

By Paul Basken May 29, 2015

A blossoming experiment in allowing a form of open-access scientific publishing appears to have hit a roadblock, after the world’s largest journal publisher found that too many universities were moving to take advantage of it.

The publisher, Elsevier, has told universities that have built their own online repositories of journal articles written by their researchers that they now must respect waiting periods typically lasting a year or two before allowing free access to Elsevier-owned content.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

A blossoming experiment in allowing a form of open-access scientific publishing appears to have hit a roadblock, after the world’s largest journal publisher found that too many universities were moving to take advantage of it.

The publisher, Elsevier, has told universities that have built their own online repositories of journal articles written by their researchers that they now must respect waiting periods typically lasting a year or two before allowing free access to Elsevier-owned content.

Elsevier is describing the policy shift as merely a reiteration of what it always has required. “We are now communicating our embargoes more clearly,” Alicia Wise, the publishing company’s director of access and policy, said on Thursday.

But representatives of universities and their researchers are crying foul, saying Elsevier is reneging now that a movement to create university repositories — web-based storehouses of articles — is rapidly gaining momentum.

The perceived threat to Elsevier comes from a combination of the repositories and a subsequent series of faculty votes at various universities establishing the expectation that researchers contribute to them. Now more than 50 campuses have such policies, many of them major research institutions, said Heather Joseph, executive director of the Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition, an advocacy alliance of 225 institutions in the United States and Canada.

“When those policies started proliferating, in 2012, you could see that Elsevier got very nervous,” Ms. Joseph said.

Battle Lines Over Access

Elsevier publishes more than 2,000 journals, including the prestigious Cell and The Lancet. It has long been a focal point for groups such as Ms. Joseph’s coalition, which has argued that research financed by taxpayers should be immediately available to anyone. Thousands of researchers signed a pledge in 2012 to boycott the company. Elsevier and other publishers have pushed back, saying they need some period of exclusive access for paying subscribers so that they can finance the costs of editing and publishing scientific work.

The Obama administration has been part of the broad battle, saying it wants federal agencies to set policies requiring free access within 12 months to the results of research they finance.

The specific dispute this year with Elsevier stems from a 2004 company policy that, according to Ms. Joseph, allowed universities to create their own online repositories that gave outsiders free and immediate access to the plain text of articles that appeared in Elsevier journals.

Elsevier agrees that it let its authors post their articles on their own websites, Ms. Wise said. But the company technically did not extend that right to universitywide repositories, even if it did not seek out and shut down transgressors, she said.

As more and more universities began creating repositories and faculty members began urging their use, Elsevier in 2012 asked universities to negotiate agreements establishing the terms of how the repositories would operate, Ms. Joseph said. Then, one month ago, it set specific embargo periods for most of its journals, ranging from six months to 48 months, that it expected the repositories to observe before making articles freely available, she said.

ADVERTISEMENT

More than 80 university-based groups, and more than 500 researchers and other open-access advocates, have now signed a letter to Elsevier protesting the action. “The policy has been adopted without any evidence that immediate sharing of articles has a negative impact on publishers’ subscriptions,” said the letter, organized by Ms. Joseph’s group and a Europe-based ally, the Confederation of Open Access Repositories.

The Association of American Universities, which represents dozens of leading research institutions in the United States, did not sign the letter but expressed support for it. “We’re disappointed also in Elsevier’s new policy,” said the group’s spokesman, Barry Toiv. “It curtails legitimate sharing that we believe does not threaten their business model.”

An Evolving Landscape

Elsevier, however, felt the emerging university-based repositories were getting too close to replicating the services it sells to survive, Ms. Wise said. Even the permission for individual scientists to post freely on their own websites might cross that line as the ability to search throughout the Internet improves, she said.

“Maybe we will continue to watch as the landscape continues to evolve, which it’s doing very rapidly,” Ms. Wise said. At the same time, she said, “it is clear that open access is an important part of the landscape and it’s here to stay, so we need to find ways to make it work, that are sustainable, and we’re doing that.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“We’re learning as we go, as are other stakeholders,” Ms. Wise said.

And universities, for their part, apparently have not reached the point where they are so bothered by Elsevier and other publishers that they refuse to use their services altogether, Ms. Joseph acknowledged.

“Universities are pretty conservative organizations, and it’s taking them a long time” to understand the relative trade-offs in relying on private publishers, she said.

At least one concern appears to have been allayed: The protest letter organized by Ms. Joseph’s group said that Elsevier’s latest policy shift appeared to be retroactive, meaning universities might have to remove some articles already posted publicly in their repositories. Ms. Wise made clear in an interview, however, that the company was not making any such request.

Paul Basken covers university research and its intersection with government policy. He can be found on Twitter @pbasken, or reached by email at paul.basken@chronicle.com.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Scholarship & Research
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Paul Basken Bio
About the Author
Paul Basken
Paul Basken was a government policy and science reporter with The Chronicle of Higher Education, where he won an annual National Press Club award for exclusives.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Mangan-Censorship-0610.jpg
Academic Freedom
‘A Banner Year for Censorship’: More States Are Restricting Classroom Discussions on Race and Gender
On the day of his retirement party, Bob Morse poses for a portrait in the Washington, D.C., offices of U.S. News and World Report in June 2025. Morse led the magazine's influential and controversial college rankings efforts since its inception in 1988. Michael Theis, The Chronicle.
List Legacy
‘U.S. News’ Rankings Guru, Soon to Retire, Reflects on the Role He’s Played in Higher Ed
Black and white photo of the Morrill Hall building on the University of Minnesota campus with red covering one side.
Finance & operations
U. of Minnesota Tries to Soften the Blow of Tuition Hikes, Budget Cuts With Faculty Benefits
Photo illustration showing a figurine of a football player with a large price tag on it.
Athletics
Loans, Fees, and TV Money: Where Colleges Are Finding the Funds to Pay Athletes

From The Review

A stack of coins falling over. Motion blur. Falling economy concept. Isolated on white.
The Review | Opinion
Will We Get a More Moderate Endowment Tax?
By Phillip Levine
Photo illustration of a classical column built of paper, with colored wires overtaking it like vines of ivy
The Review | Essay
The Latest Awful EdTech Buzzword: “Learnings”
By Kit Nicholls
William F. Buckley, Jr.
The Review | Interview
William F. Buckley Jr. and the Origins of the Battle Against ‘Woke’
By Evan Goldstein

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: A Global Leadership Perspective
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin