Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    Student Housing
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
News

Unshared Governance

New pressures threaten the faculty’s role in leadership

By Eric Kelderman February 29, 2016
Unshared  Governance 1
Eric Petersen for The Chronicle

One fall morning in 2014, Thomas W. Ross, then president of the University of North Carolina system, arrived at his office ready for a full day of meetings.

But he wasn’t ready for an unscheduled meeting with John C. Fennebresque, chairman of the system’s Board of Governors at the time, who asked him to step down.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Unshared  Governance 1
Eric Petersen for The Chronicle

One fall morning in 2014, Thomas W. Ross, then president of the University of North Carolina system, arrived at his office ready for a full day of meetings.

But he wasn’t ready for an unscheduled meeting with John C. Fennebresque, chairman of the system’s Board of Governors at the time, who asked him to step down.

Mr. Ross, who left office this year, was popular with faculty members, staff members, and students. He had been appointed to the position only in 2010. But between that time and his dismissal, control of the state legislature had changed parties, and Republican lawmakers had appointed a new set of trustees.

The board gave no clear explanation for asking for his resignation, saying the call for change had “nothing to do with President Ross’s performance.”

Mr. Ross has his own explanation: “What happened was entirely, or mostly, political — no question,” he said in December, just weeks after the governing board named Margaret Spellings, who served as education secretary under President George W. Bush, as the new system president. Once again, the board bypassed higher education’s longstanding model of shared governance, which traditionally gives faculty members a voice in the search process.

The events in North Carolina are just one example of something that’s happening more often in higher education: A governing board makes a significant leadership or policy change that contradicts or simply ignores the opinions of faculty members and of other employees. Faculty members worry that this trend is part of a widespread attack on shared governance.

Governing boards are reacting to fiscal pressures, political heat from elected officials, and complaints from students and parents struggling to afford a college degree, says David A. Longanecker, president of the Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education. “In my career, I’ve never seen so much churn in the policy and practice of higher education,” says Mr. Longanecker, who has led the regional policy-advisory group for more than 17 years.

The challenges to shared governance reflect broader currents in the nation’s economic and political climates. In the 2001 fiscal year, the average state appropriation for higher education was nearly $9,000 per student — a high-water mark, according to figures from the State Higher Education Executive Officers. But two recessions over the next 15 years led to widespread state budget cuts for higher education during a period when college enrollments were rapidly rising. As a result, state appropriations per student have decreased by more than 25 percent over that time, as a whole, while tuition has risen to fill the gap.

Meanwhile, in 2010, as the nation was still in the throes of the worst economic downturn since the Depression, voters elected a wave of Republican lawmakers into state legislatures and governors’ seats across the country. The election results, which gave the GOP control of more state legislative seats than at any time since 1928, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures, have had major implications for higher education.

TAKEAWAY

Shared Governance Under Attack

  • Faculty members worry that governing boards are bypassing longtime principles of shared governance by making more leadership and policy decisions unilaterally.
  • Governing boards are reacting to fiscal pressures, political heat from elected officials, and complaints from students and parents struggling to afford a college degree.
  • Wealthy donors may also be undermining shared governance by seeking to control faculty appointments to academic centers that they support financially.

While state budget cuts have been a bipartisan issue, several Republican governors and state legislators have expressed a dim view of academe, and, in particular, the role and work of faculty members. Such views have led to direct attempts to weaken the faculty role in some states. In Wisconsin, lawmakers have eliminated collective bargaining for state employees and, more recently, removed provisions protecting shared governance and tenure from state law.

ADVERTISEMENT

In other states, challenges to shared governance have also come from governing boards that were appointed by Republican lawmakers. The Iowa Board of Regents this year appointed J. Bruce Harreld, a former vice president at IBM and part-time instructor at Harvard University, as president of the University of Iowa, despite overwhelming opposition from the faculty.

Faculty members objected to Mr. Harreld’s lack of experience in higher education. But there was more outrage over revelations that the board’s chairman had engineered the appointment by arranging secret meetings with a majority of the regents before they made their selection.

Helping to choose the president is a key role of faculty members in shared governance, says William G. Bowen, a former president of Princeton University and author of several books on higher-education administration and governance. “I don’t think you can make a really wise decision about a potential president without understanding how the faculty view the person,” he says. “I don’t think a person has a good chance of succeeding as a leader without faculty support.”

The forces undermining shared governance go beyond partisan politics, however, and can also include pressures within academe.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I wouldn’t simply blame politics,” says Henry F. Reichman, chairman of the American Association of University Professors’ Committee A on Academic Freedom and Tenure and a professor emeritus of history at California State University-East Bay. “There is a bipartisan notion that education is in crisis, and that the people who are educators are at fault, and the ones who know nothing about education are the ones to fix it.”

He adds: “The model of governance is increasingly a top-down, corporate-style CEO with dictatorial powers — a model that has shown itself to have disastrous consequences.”

Public and private colleges alike are also under pressure from wealthy donors to weaken shared governance, says Hans-Joerg Tiede, associate secretary of the AAUP’s Department of Academic Freedom, Tenure, and Governance. One example is when donors want a role in appointing faculty members to academic centers that they help pay for. Some financially strapped colleges may be willing to make concessions, he says.

“That’s clearly a strike against shared governance,” he says, “because faculty appointments should be vetted by faculty and not donors.”

ADVERTISEMENT

A 2008 agreement between the Charles G. Koch Foundation and Florida State University, for example, required that any faculty members hired for a program supporting the study of “political economy and free enterprise” be vetted by an advisory committee appointed by the foundation. A review of that agreement, by an independent faculty group, found that the economics department did not actually follow that provision.

In some cases, governing-board members simply have little understanding of the role of shared governance, says William G. Tierney, co-director of the Pullias Center for Higher Education at the University of Southern California. For people who don’t understand the culture of higher education, he says, “tenure and shared governance seem like a strange way to run an organization.”

He and others say it’s time for shared governance to change with the times and, in particular, for faculty members to play a role in a variety of issues, like those that have arisen as financial pressures and public expectations have increased. “I would like faculty to deal with things like pension reform,” Mr. Tierney says. “There are very few answers coming from faculty other than ‘don’t touch it.’ The issues of diversity that have exploded over the past few months — where were the boards and faculty on this?”

The information age, along with the push for more Americans to earn some form of college credential, has democratized higher education, says Mr. Longanecker. That means there will be a wider variety of voices influencing it — including voices that focus more on success through accountability rather than prestige and selectivity.

ADVERTISEMENT

Higher education is being forced to change, he says, “and we’re a little slow as an industry to respond.”

Eric Kelderman writes about money and accountability in higher education, including such areas as state policy, accreditation, and legal affairs. You can find him on Twitter @etkeld, or email him at eric.kelderman@chronicle.com.

A version of this article appeared in the March 4, 2016, issue.
Read other items in The Trends Report: 10 Key Shifts in Higher Education.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Eric Kelderman
About the Author
Eric Kelderman
Eric Kelderman covers issues of power, politics, and purse strings in higher education. You can email him at eric.kelderman@chronicle.com, or find him on Twitter @etkeld.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

Commentary: The Uncertain Future of University Governance

More News

UCLA students, researchers and demonstrators rally during a "Kill the Cuts" protest against the Trump administration's funding cuts on research, health and higher education at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) in Los Angeles on April 8, 2025.
Scholarship & Research
Trump Proposed Slashing the National Science Foundation’s Budget. A Key Senate Committee Just Refused.
Illustration of a steamroller rolling over a colorful road and leaving gray asphalt in its wake.
Newly Updated
Oregon State U. Will End a Renowned Program That Aimed to Reduce Bias in Hiring
Dr. Gregory Washington, president of George Mason University.
Another probe
George Mason President Discriminated Against White People After George Floyd Protests, Justice Dept. Says
Protesters gather outside the Department of Education headquarters in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 14, 2025 to protest the Trump administrations cuts at the agency.
An Uncertain Future
The Education Dept. Got a Green Light to Shrink. Here Are 3 Questions About What’s Next.

From The Review

Photo-based illustration with repeated images of a student walking, in the pattern of a graph trending down, then up.
The Review | Opinion
7 Ways Community Colleges Can Boost Enrollment
By Bob Levey
Illustration of an ocean tide shaped like Donald Trump about to wash away sandcastles shaped like a college campus.
The Review | Essay
Why Universities Are So Powerless in Their Fight Against Trump
By Jason Owen-Smith
Photo-based illustration of a closeup of a pencil meshed with a circuit bosrd
The Review | Essay
How Are Students Really Using AI?
By Derek O'Connell

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin