> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
Admissions
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

UVa Eliminated Early Decision in 2006 to Level the Admissions Playing Field. Why Is It Coming Back?

By  Terry Nguyen
May 30, 2019
The U. of Virginia Rotunda
U. of Virginia
The U. of Virginia Rotunda

In 2006 the University of Virginia removed early decision as an admissions option for prospective students in the interest of diversity. A mainstay in the institution’s admissions process since the 1960s, early decision is more commonly used by wealthier, more advantaged students, and fewer low-income students apply through it, administrators said in 2006.

But on Thursday the university announced it would reinstate early decision as one of three admissions timelines students can use, in addition to early action and regular decision.

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

The U. of Virginia Rotunda
U. of Virginia
The U. of Virginia Rotunda

In 2006 the University of Virginia removed early decision as an admissions option for prospective students in the interest of diversity. A mainstay in the institution’s admissions process since the 1960s, early decision is more commonly used by wealthier, more advantaged students, and fewer low-income students apply through it, administrators said in 2006.

But on Thursday the university announced it would reinstate early decision as one of three admissions timelines students can use, in addition to early action and regular decision.

Through early action, a practice the university started in 2011, a student can apply to multiple colleges early but is not required to attend any of them if offered admission, typically in January. Early decision, however, requires students to commit to a college or university that admits them, usually in December, before a financial-aid package is calculated.

“After speaking with students, families, and high schools across the nation, we found that the interest in early notification has increased,” said Greg Roberts, dean of admission. The university received more than 20,000 early-action applications last year.

ADVERTISEMENT

Roberts said the university is mindful that early decision is popular among affluent families. But because the university cannot anticipate how large the early-decision pool will be, Roberts said, it can’t predict the percentage of students likely to be admitted through early decision.

But he denied that the restoration of early decision would unbalance the admissions playing field. “If we felt that adding early decision would jeopardize the gains we’ve made in diversity, there is no way we would have done this,” he said.

A 2016 analysis by the Jack Kent Cooke Foundation found that high-achieving, low-income students are half as likely as are their wealthy peers to apply early, even though it would increase their likelihood of admission.

“Applying early benefits any student who does it,” said Jennifer Glynn, director of research at the foundation. “But what we found is that wealthier students are more likely to apply, and so it becomes a question of access.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Offering early decision as another application option creates more flexibility for families and students who know that the university is their first choice, Roberts said.

“We’re approaching this as an additional option for some students,” he said, “but this isn’t designed to give anyone an advantage in the process review.”

Follow Terry Nguyen on Twitter at @terrygtnguyen, or email her at terry.nguyen@chronicle.com.

A version of this article appeared in the June 21, 2019, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Finance & OperationsAdmissions & Enrollment
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin