> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
News
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

Washington Voters Approve a Ban on Racial Preferences; 18 Other States Decide Measures Affecting Academe

By  Patrick Healy
November 4, 1998

To the disappointment of many college leaders around the United States, Washington State voters on Tuesday approved a measure to bar their public universities from using racial preferences to admit students, hire employees, or award contracts.

ALSO SEE:

A chart showing the results of state referenda.

Washington was one of 19 states where voters decided ballot measures of interest to academe.

With 85 per cent of the precincts reporting, 58 per cent of Washington voters had approved the measure known as I-200, which will ban the use of preferences by public higher education and other agencies of state government.

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

To the disappointment of many college leaders around the United States, Washington State voters on Tuesday approved a measure to bar their public universities from using racial preferences to admit students, hire employees, or award contracts.

ALSO SEE:

A chart showing the results of state referenda.

Washington was one of 19 states where voters decided ballot measures of interest to academe.

With 85 per cent of the precincts reporting, 58 per cent of Washington voters had approved the measure known as I-200, which will ban the use of preferences by public higher education and other agencies of state government.

Opponents of I-200 signaled that they would go to court to block it from taking effect. If the measure does become law, however, the University of Washington and other public institutions plan to stop using preferences in admissions and other programs.

ADVERTISEMENT

Officials at the University of Washington believe that I-200 could cause a 15-per-cent decline in the numbers of black and Hispanic freshmen there. Deans of the university’s law school and other programs fear similar drops.

Supporters of I-200 seized upon these predictions as evidence that the university and other public campuses have been giving away seats in their undergraduate and professional schools to unqualified minority students.

The I-200 forces faced a broad-based coalition of opponents, including many business leaders and led by Gov. Gary Locke, a Democrat and the first Asian-American chief executive of a state besides Hawaii.

The University of Washington’s president, Richard L. McCormick, gave ringing endorsements of affirmative action throughout the fall, but he and other university officials avoided directly attacking I-200. A state law barred them from campaigning on the ballot measure, and politically minded self-restraint also kicked in. (Many members of the Republican-controlled Legislature supported I-200.)

Experts on affirmative action warn that the passage of I-200 could encourage politicians in other states to initiate similar wars at the ballot box.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I think it’s a bellwether of things to come, but there are even more telling signs out there that affirmative action’s in trouble,” said Michael A. Olivas, a University of Houston law professor. He pointed to recent decisions by federal courts, and by state-government officials, that have restricted the use of affirmative action by colleges in admitting students and awarding contracts.

In other ballot measures considered by voters on Tuesday:

  • North Dakotans were poised to reject a referendum that would have stripped the names of state colleges and universities from the state Constitution. With 78 per cent of the ballots counted, 65 per cent of the state’s voters opposed the measure. Critics feared that removing the names of colleges from the Constitution would have made it easier for the state to close some small institutions.
  • California voters approved a $9.2-billion bond issue aimed at improving facilities at colleges and schools throughout the state, according to the Associated Press.
  • Voters in Maine approved a $20-million bond issue that will benefit research and educational institutions, according to the A.P.
  • The A.P. projected that Montana voters had approved a tax that supports the Montana University System, as they are given the chance to do once each decade.
  • Nebraska voters defeated a proposal to restrict government spending by limiting the ability of state and local governments to raise taxes, according to the A.P. Also, with more than half of the ballots tallied, about 60 per cent of voters were endorsing the portion of a constitutional amendment that would stop the flow of motor-vehicle-tax revenues to public colleges in the state.
  • Voters in South Dakota apparently rejected a ballot measure that would have prohibited the state from using property-tax revenue to support elementary and secondary education, according to the A.P. College officials feared that the measure would have forced the state to divert money from higher education to help the elementary and secondary schools.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin