Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
News

What Does Higher Ed Have to Say About the Proposed Title IX Rules?

By Sarah Brown January 30, 2019
Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos
Secretary of Education Betsy DeVosSaul Loeb, AFP, Getty Images

The Education Department’s proposed regulations on Title IX, the federal gender-equity law, would provide colleges with some long-sought flexibility when responding to sexual-misconduct reports — but would make campus disciplinary proceedings far too legalistic and burdensome.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos
Secretary of Education Betsy DeVosSaul Loeb, AFP, Getty Images

The Education Department’s proposed regulations on Title IX, the federal gender-equity law, would provide colleges with some long-sought flexibility when responding to sexual-misconduct reports — but would make campus disciplinary proceedings far too legalistic and burdensome.

That’s according to the public comments, compiled in a 33-page letter, submitted to the Department of Education on Wednesday by the American Council on Education, higher education’s biggest lobbying arm. Sixty other associations signed onto the letter.

The letter runs through a long list of “serious concerns” that colleges have about the proposed regulations. On the whole, said Ted Mitchell, ACE’s president, they “are a step in the wrong direction.”

Terry Hartle, senior vice president for government and public affairs at ACE, told The Chronicle that the association spent more time on the Title IX letter than on any other public statement in the past five years.

“The draft regulation is like the world’s biggest artichoke,” Hartle said. “You see something and you start peeling off a layer, and there’s another layer below that, and another layer, and they get finer and finer.”

Higher-education groups have often argued that the Obama-era guidance — which significantly changed how colleges handle sexual-misconduct cases — was inflexible and often confusing for administrators. The groups criticized federal officials for choosing not to solicit feedback on their proposals through a regulatory process.

Betsy DeVos, secretary of education, announced in 2017 that the department would scrap that guidance and issue new Title IX regulations. The proposed rules were published in November, and the public-comment period for them ended on Wednesday.

Here are five of the main points in ACE’s letter:

Colleges are educational institutions, not court systems.

Requiring live hearings and cross-examination for sexual-misconduct cases would effectively force colleges to create miniature courtrooms, which isn’t appropriate, the letter says.

It asks the department to abandon both mandates and give colleges the ability to choose between hearings or a nonhearing model, as long as each student involved in a case has the chance to test the credibility of the opposing party and witnesses.

ADVERTISEMENT

The letter also notes that the department uses “due process” more than 30 times in the proposed rules and recommends that federal officials instead use a term like “fair process.”

There’s a presumption in the proposed regulations that every college should be able to “provide a court-like forum for one individual to press a case against another,” the letter says. That doesn’t take into account the realities for small and underresourced colleges.

The letter also predicts that the proposed regulations would bring about a cottage industry of lawyers who would bring an “adversarial” tone to campus disciplinary proceedings.

Colleges should have the flexibility to “treat different cases differently.”

As long as institutions are running a fair process and following their policies, the letter says, administrators should be able to make judgment calls about what kind of approach makes sense for individual cases.

ADVERTISEMENT

The letter praises the department’s proposal for allowing informal resolution of cases — in other words, no investigation or hearing — if both the alleged victim and the accused student agree to it. That change, the letter says, “would provide survivors more flexibility to determine how they wish to proceed.”

College leaders were also pleased to see the elimination of the “arbitrary and inflexible” requirement for resolving sexual-misconduct cases in 60 days, which had been part of previous Title IX guidance.

When colleges act in good faith to comply with Title IX, don’t second-guess them.

The letter hints at colleges’ frustration with the heavy-handed approach of the Obama-era civil-rights office, which opened hundreds of investigations into institutions for possibly mishandling sexual-misconduct cases.

The department should aim to work with colleges to prevent sexual harassment, the letter says, not against them.

ADVERTISEMENT

“When institutions fail to live up to their obligations under Title IX, and clearly err, they should be held accountable,” it says. “But when institutions act in good faith, after a careful and deliberative process, they should not be second-guessed by the department.”

Colleges don’t want to be let off the hook.

Many observers have said the proposed Title IX rules would take some of the pressure off colleges for responding to cases of sexual misconduct, by scaling back the kinds of cases that administrators would be required to investigate.

The letter commends the department for providing an explicit definition of sexual harassment, and for clarifying that officials would have to investigate only those sexual-misconduct reports that the institution had “actual knowledge” of.

“However, institutions will also continue to act upon sexual harassment outside of or beyond the regulation’s specific requirements,” the letter says. “The regulations should be equally clear that they do not prohibit or inhibit such institutional response.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The letter takes issue with the department’s suggestion that if a report doesn’t fall within its proposed narrower definition of sexual harassment, colleges “must dismiss the formal complaint with regard to that conduct.”

“This language implies that an institution is prohibited from moving forward under its own campus disciplinary procedures to address a violation of its own code of conduct for sexual misconduct if that conduct falls outside the boundaries of the proposed rule’s definition,” the letter says. “We believe this is a serious mistake.”

Many colleges would be forced to adopt a higher standard of evidence.

The Obama administration told colleges to use a standard of preponderance of evidence — that is, more likely than not — to determine whether a sexual assault had occurred. Some state laws also require that standard. Critics charged that “preponderance” was unfairly low, resulting in the punishment of accused students even when the evidence was murky.

The proposed regulations would technically give colleges a choice of which standard to use — preponderance or “clear and convincing,” a higher burden. But they would also require colleges to use the same standard for all campus disciplinary proceedings, including those for faculty and staff members.

Because of collective-bargaining agreements and institutional-governance policies, the letter says, many colleges would be forced to adopt “clear and convincing” for sexual-misconduct cases, “making this a de facto federally prescribed standard.” The letter implores the department to drop that mandate.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
SarahBrown2024
About the Author
Sarah Brown
Sarah Brown is The Chronicle’s news editor. Follow her on Twitter @Brown_e_Points, or email her at sarah.brown@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Vector illustration of large open scissors  with several workers in seats dangling by white lines
Iced Out
Duke Administrators Accused of Bypassing Shared-Governance Process in Offering Buyouts
Illustration showing money being funnelled into the top of a microscope.
'A New Era'
Higher-Ed Associations Pitch an Alternative to Trump’s Cap on Research Funding
Illustration showing classical columns of various heights, each turning into a stack of coins
Endowment funds
The Nation’s Wealthiest Small Colleges Just Won a Big Tax Exemption
WASHINGTON, DISTICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES - 2025/04/14: A Pro-Palestinian demonstrator holding a sign with Release Mahmud Khalil written on it, stands in front of the ICE building while joining in a protest. Pro-Palestinian demonstrators rally in front of the ICE building, demanding freedom for Mahmoud Khalil and all those targeted for speaking out against genocide in Palestine. Protesters demand an end to U.S. complicity and solidarity with the resistance in Gaza. (Photo by Probal Rashid/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Campus Activism
An Anonymous Group’s List of Purported Critics of Israel Helped Steer a U.S. Crackdown on Student Activists

From The Review

John T. Scopes as he stood before the judges stand and was sentenced, July 2025.
The Review | Essay
100 Years Ago, the Scopes Monkey Trial Discovered Academic Freedom
By John K. Wilson
Vector illustration of a suited man with a pair of scissors for a tie and an American flag button on his lapel.
The Review | Opinion
A Damaging Endowment Tax Crosses the Finish Line
By Phillip Levine
University of Virginia President Jim Ryan keeps his emotions in check during a news conference, Monday, Nov. 14, 2022 in Charlottesville. Va. Authorities say three people have been killed and two others were wounded in a shooting at the University of Virginia and a student is in custody. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)
The Review | Opinion
Jim Ryan’s Resignation Is a Warning
By Robert Zaretsky

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin