What I’m Reading: ‘In Defense of a Liberal Education’
By G.T. (Buck) SmithMay 8, 2016
G.T. (Buck) Smith
In In Defense of a Liberal Education, Fareed Zakaria writes that learning “how to write clearly, how to express yourself convincingly, and how to think analytically” are the prime virtues of education. These are almost exactly what many of us at small liberal-arts colleges hope for our own students as well.
Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.
Don’t have an account? Sign up now.
A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.
In In Defense of a Liberal Education, Fareed Zakaria writes that learning “how to write clearly, how to express yourself convincingly, and how to think analytically” are the prime virtues of education. These are almost exactly what many of us at small liberal-arts colleges hope for our own students as well.
Clearly, we’re onto something of timeless value. We had best keep at it without apology or deviation.
This of course is not an easy thing. But we will shortchange our students greatly if “getting a job” is all we prepare them for. Instead, we must do for them what Mr. Zakaria says one of his professors at Yale did for him: “He made me realize that I should take my passion seriously, even without being sure what it might lead to in terms of a profession.”
Discovering, and then following, one’s passion is what going to college should be all about. In an age when many people espouse the idea that small colleges are no longer relevant, that students can learn all they need to know at a distance and in isolation, our students and faculty know a different truth: that the bond between teacher and student, scholar and apprentice-scholar, is critical to the journey of the mind and heart.
For another president’s perspective on Mr. Zakaria’s book, see this essay.