Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    AI and Microcredentials
Sign In
Commentary

What Really Happened at Stanford University Press: an Insider’s Account

By Grant Barnes May 10, 2019
What Really Happened at Stanford University Press: an Insider’s Account 1
Adam Niklewicz for The Chronicle

The near-execution of Stanford University Press is no surprise. For years it has been on death row. A five-year plan, another five-year plan, an execution date, a reprieve. … death by a thousand cuts. That’s what the university’s publishing business has been going through, and it represents the culmination of a process that began when I was director, during the 1980s and early ’90s.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

What Really Happened at Stanford University Press: an Insider’s Account 1
Adam Niklewicz for The Chronicle

The near-execution of Stanford University Press is no surprise. For years it has been on death row. A five-year plan, another five-year plan, an execution date, a reprieve. … death by a thousand cuts. That’s what the university’s publishing business has been going through, and it represents the culmination of a process that began when I was director, during the 1980s and early ’90s.

I took office promising to greatly improve productivity and to open new lines of publication in the humanities. It was my perception that the press, while enjoying a sterling reputation for its editorial and its sales and distribution services, had not kept pace with the times and was weakly funded. The university wanted the press to do more in the humanities. We quickly tripled the output with no increase in staff, opened new channels of co-publication and distribution with several British publishers, and, while maintaining existing book programs, became a leading publisher of literary and social theory.

To close the gap between income and expenses, I proposed vigorous fund raising. Like other university presses, we needed an endowment. History provides many examples of this happening at prestigious university presses. But Stanford was unwilling to authorize fund raising; the hardheaded economists and scientists who held the highest offices in the hierarchy had other priorities. They insisted that, along with the university’s other “auxiliary services,” the press needed to be self-supporting. Most of the successors in those policy-setting roles have been equally unsupportive.

Here a bit of history is in order. By the late 19th century, the world’s great universities had, almost without exception, recognized that scholarly publishing was integral to their missions. The founding of Stanford’s press can be traced to an 1891 letter written by David Starr Jordan, the university’s first president, to Leland Stanford, its founder. The letter specified several conditions for accepting the position, including his expectation that the university would establish a press. In the circumstances of the time, that meant installing a small printing plant as well as editorial and distribution capacity. A century later, By the time I arrived, the press had been stripped of its printing and binding services, which had long subsidized its scholarly publishing, and had become dependent on small subsidies written into the annual budget.

But we still had our own office building and our own modern warehouse, right in the middle of campus. Our geographic position appeared to symbolize the press’s centrality to the university’s mission: We were located at the time on a pathway that led, on a five-minute walk, from the quad to the faculty club. What could go wrong?

Stanford’s commitment to the humanities has, at least in recent decades, been a matter of debate. Its great reputation was earned in the sciences and in engineering and medicine. Its schools of business and law were similarly favored. In all of those departments, the watchword was growth. The development office put carefully written proposals into the hands of potential donors. We can draw conclusions about the university’s priorities by observing the locations of the construction cranes.

To be a great university, the humanities and social sciences were needed but not necessarily central. Ditto for the university press. Soon after I resigned, the press was reassigned administratively to the library and physically relocated to the perimeter of the campus. After another few years, it was moved again, this time off-campus, several miles away. These changes reflect choices made at the highest level of the university.

As the digital age was dawning, there was panic in some executive suites at Stanford, where the first take was that books would become less and less important. To some key figures, the press appeared to represent old technology married to sentimental notions about the intrinsic value of scholarly books. Humanists and a few social scientists were our principal defenders on the faculty.

So now a downward financial spiral at the Stanford press that started 30 years ago is getting steadily worse. The annual net cost to the university of maintaining a press, having grown steadily, is now many times what was required for the support of a healthier press in the ’80s and ’90s. To be sure, it’s a lot of money — a sum that could instead support several graduate fellowships, a proposition that was recently dangled by the provost.

ADVERTISEMENT

But this is a false choice. No capital expenditure, and no commitment to support operating expenses, can be equated to income streams for faculty members or students. Were it otherwise, engineering classes might be meeting in tents on the ground formerly occupied by the university press instead of in their new building.

Like its parent institution, a university press is viable only if its reputation is intact and its status permanent. It cannot succeed if it is known to be dangling by a series of five-year threads. A healthy university press is one that takes particular care with the works of its own faculty members and graduates, and which takes part in the international system of scholarly publishing. That system encourages submissions from outstanding scholars wherever they are located and facilitates financial support for authors wherever they publish.

The support of university-press publishing has thus become a shared obligation of all research-oriented universities. The system provides sorely needed aid to neophyte writers, many of whom have just obtained their doctorates. The system encourages fields of study that have little appeal to commercial publishers, such as the arts and classics; peer review that makes an honest effort to provide objective decision-making; and editorial services that deeply engage the author’s intellect as well as writing strategies.

The digitization of everything has not killed off books. Many universities still see some of their best mirror images in the great books they publish. It continues to be true, as Jordan believed, that the glories of a great university include the refinement and dissemination as well as creation of science and scholarship.

ADVERTISEMENT

Stanford University Press has a long way to go to catch up to the reputation of its parent university. That was not the case in days of yore, and it will require removal from death row, years of hard work, and major investments to bring it back.

Grant Barnes is director emeritus of the Stanford University Press.

A version of this article appeared in the June 7, 2019, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Finance & Operations Opinion
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

Facing Blowback, Stanford Partly Reverses Course and Pledges Press Subsidy for One More Year
Shame on Stanford
Proposed Cut of Stanford U. Press’s Subsidy Sparks Outrage

More News

Photo illustration showing internal email text snippets over a photo of a University of Iowa campus quad
Red-state reticence
Facing Research Cuts, Officials at U. of Iowa Spoke of a ‘Limited Ability to Publicly Fight This’
Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues
Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through paper that is a photo of an idyllic liberal arts college campus on one side and money on the other
Finance
Small Colleges Are Banding Together Against a Higher Endowment Tax. This Is Why.

From The Review

Football game between UCLA and Colorado University, at Folsom Field in Boulder, Colo., Sept. 24, 2022.
The Review | Opinion
My University Values Football More Than Education
By Sigman Byrd
Photo- and type-based illustration depicting the acronym AAUP with the second A as the arrow of a compass and facing not north but southeast.
The Review | Essay
The Unraveling of the AAUP
By Matthew W. Finkin
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome propped on a stick attached to a string, like a trap.
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Can’t Trust the Federal Government. What Now?
By Brian Rosenberg

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin