Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    AI and Microcredentials
Sign In
Admissions

What Should College-Admissions Reform Look Like? Researchers Share New Ideas

By Eric Hoover August 4, 2020
Marie Bigham, founder and executive director of Accept, speaks last fall at a national admissions gathering.
Marie Bigham, founder and executive director of Accept, speaks last fall at a national admissions gathering.Jamaal McKenzie

Last fall, more than 100 admissions leaders, policy makers, and researchers gathered in Washington, D.C., to discuss the system that just about everyone thinks is broken but no one is quite sure how to fix.

The summit was part of Hack the Gates, a yearlong initiative to reimagine college admissions, sponsored by Admissions Community Cultivating Equity and Peace Today, known as Accept, and the Race and Intersectional Studies in Educational Equity Center at Colorado State University at Fort Collins. Heavy on small-group brainstorming sessions, the two-day event was meant to drive potential answers to a big question: How can the process better serve low-income, first-generation, and underrepresented minority students?

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Last fall, more than 100 admissions leaders, policy makers, and researchers gathered in Washington, D.C., to discuss the system that just about everyone thinks is broken but no one is quite sure how to fix.

The summit was part of Hack the Gates, a yearlong initiative to reimagine college admissions, sponsored by Admissions Community Cultivating Equity and Peace Today, known as Accept, and the Race and Intersectional Studies in Educational Equity Center at Colorado State University at Fort Collins. Heavy on small-group brainstorming sessions, the two-day event was meant to drive potential answers to a big question: How can the process better serve low-income, first-generation, and underrepresented minority students?

Those discussions inspired eight new research briefs that were published online on Tuesday. Each contains recommendations that were previously shared with admissions officials, who gave feedback on their practicality. “We hope to develop pilot programs for the papers and take the ideas for a test drive,” said Marie Bigham, Accept’s founder and executive director. “Radically reimagining admissions requires creativity, openness, and courage from all of us in the college-admissions ecosystem, and Hack the Gates will keep pushing.”

Taken together, the briefs offer some provocative recommendations for promoting racial and socioeconomic equity within a system that in many ways works against it. Here’s a snapshot of some key themes.

It’s time to rethink recruitment. In “Reimagining College Fairs for Equity: The Role of High Schools and Postsecondary Education,” Adrian H. Huerta, an assistant professor of education at the University of Southern California, proposes a checklist that high schools and colleges can use to foster college-going knowledge: “The pandemic era challenges the college-access field … to reconsider and rethink how they design and facilitate socially distanced and post-pandemic programs for prospective students.”

Ted Thornhill, an associate professor of sociology at Florida Gulf Coast University, argues that colleges must ensure that admissions offices are free from racially discriminatory policies, practices, and personnel. In “Communication Equity Audits: Eliminating Racialized Responsiveness Among College Admissions Counselors,” he writes: “Scrutinizing the email and other recruitment and outreach practices of these organizational gatekeepers can help create a more transparent and anti-racist admissions process.”

There’s a better way to match students and colleges. In “Dismantling the Hunger Games: Exploring a Match System in Selective Admissions,” OiYan Poon, an associate professor of higher-education leadership at Colorado State, suggests an alternative to the selective-admissions process that would emphasize students’ educational interests, and be publicly managed with oversight by the U.S. Department of Education. One goal: reducing the role of a student’s ability to pay in admissions outcomes. “It’s time,” Poon writes, “to reject and rebel against the cultural and structural norms of domination and oppression in the current systems of selective college admissions.”

Test-optional is just a start. Dominique J. Baker, an assistant professor of education policy at Southern Methodist University, and Akil Bello, senior director of advocacy and advancement at the National Center for Fair & Open Testing, wrote “In a Pandemic, Test-Optional Admissions Is Necessary but Insufficient,” which describes how “traditional measures of ‘academic success’ will likely be less accurate during the pandemic.” They offer advice on three concerns relating to test-optional policies: states that require students to take the ACT or SAT for high-school graduation; the pandemic’s effect on recent-term high-school grades; and the speed with which many colleges have dropped testing requirements.

“As admissions professionals evaluate prospective students, it will be important for them to keep in mind things like layoffs, infection rates, and deaths from the pandemic,” the authors write. “Providing deep contextual information to admissions professionals can help them to evaluate applicants more thoroughly.”

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Admissions & Enrollment Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Eric Hoover
About the Author
Eric Hoover
Eric Hoover writes about the challenges of getting to, and through, college. Follow him on Twitter @erichoov, or email him, at eric.hoover@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues
Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through paper that is a photo of an idyllic liberal arts college campus on one side and money on the other
Finance
Small Colleges Are Banding Together Against a Higher Endowment Tax. This Is Why.
Pano Kanelos, founding president of the U. of Austin.
Q&A
One Year In, What Has ‘the Anti-Harvard’ University Accomplished?

From The Review

Photo- and type-based illustration depicting the acronym AAUP with the second A as the arrow of a compass and facing not north but southeast.
The Review | Essay
The Unraveling of the AAUP
By Matthew W. Finkin
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome propped on a stick attached to a string, like a trap.
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Can’t Trust the Federal Government. What Now?
By Brian Rosenberg
Illustration of an unequal sign in black on a white background
The Review | Essay
What Is Replacing DEI? Racism.
By Richard Amesbury

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin