I don’t think we need another book defending the liberal arts. They are sermons to the converted. —Greg Britton
•
We have enough Big History to last several lifetimes. —Elizabeth Branch Dyson
•
I don’t know, but diminishing sales will tell us soon and then we’ll all move to overpublishing in a different area.—Ian Malcolm
•
- Our Contributors
- What is the most common misunderstanding that scholars have about university presses?
- Scholarly prose gets a bad rap. Is it deserved?
- Do we need more university presses? Fewer?
- How will university presses look 20 years from now?
- How should the university press role in hiring and promotion change?
- What book do you wish someone would write?
- What is the biggest challenge in university-press publishing?
- Acquisitions editors are overwhelmingly white. How does this affect what gets published?
Self-reflexive studies of the digital humanities. I want to see examples of how digital scholarship has transformed our understanding of particular issues in the humanities rather than yet another effort to define whether digital humanities is a field or not. —Charles Watkinson
We’re sorry. Something went wrong.
We are unable to fully display the content of this page.
The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.
Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.
If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com