Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    AI and Microcredentials
Sign In
BOSTON, MA - AUGUST 31:  A general silhouette view of one of the many gates to the Harvard University campus on August 31, 2018 in Boston MA.  (Photo by Paul Marotta, Getty Images)
Paul Marotta, Getty Images

When Professors Close Ranks

As the John Comaroff case shows, faculty members are too often complicit in concealing sexual harassment.

The Review | Opinion
By Claire Bond Potter February 10, 2022

Today, a graduate student asked me to be on their dissertation committee. Of course, I am always honored by this request. It represents trust. It offers the opportunity for an intellectual relationship based on a shared love of ideas and the prospect of discovering new knowledge. And because I spent the first 20 years at a university where my department only granted the B.A., I know that advising lays the groundwork for a long-term friendship, but that cultivates professionalism on both sides.

And then, when they mentioned another potential committee member, I said bluntly that this individual was a known sexual harasser. So we agreed together that this was a no-fly zone and moved on to other options.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Today, a graduate student asked me to be on their dissertation committee. Of course, I am always honored by this request. It represents trust. It offers the opportunity for an intellectual relationship based on a shared love of ideas and the prospect of discovering new knowledge. And because I spent my first 20 years at a university where my department granted only the B.A., I know that advising may lay the groundwork for a long-term friendship, one that cultivates professionalism on both sides.

And then, when they mentioned another potential committee member, I said bluntly that this individual was a known sexual harasser. So we agreed together that this was a no-fly zone and moved on to other options.

Before today, I would have wrestled over the decision to name a sexual harasser. But, unlike the 38 Harvard faculty who initially signed a letter supporting the anthropologist and accused serial sexual harasser John Comaroff (34 have now retracted), I like to have firsthand, accurate knowledge about things I stick my nose into. Therefore, I will refrain from speculating why these professors rushed to protest a disciplinary outcome that is not (yet) career-ending for Comaroff.

We need to tell students who the harassers are. Name their names.

But I will tell you one true thing about what I do for a living: We faculty generally know who the sexual harassers among us are.

If the lawsuit filed against Harvard this week in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts is even partially true (and let me be clear that I believe these women), Harvard, and before it, the University of Chicago, covered up the long-term psychological torture of graduate students in anthropology.

Here’s a sample of what is accused:

To another (“Harvard Student 2”), his advisee, he commented on her appearance; shared his attraction to other students (describing one student as “beautiful” and another as “out of [his] league”); recounted his sexual history and sexual preferences to her in detail; and frequently shared sexual jokes that made her uncomfortable. He also winked at her in class, drank out of her water bottle in the middle of a course he was teaching, called her “my date,” and kissed her on the forehead without her consent — all in view of other students. He told her that three students at UChicago would say he had sex with them, but he branded them as “liars.”

But, as they used to say on the TV ads for the Ginsu knife, there’s much, much more. Here is a grosser allegation:

On or about September 24, 2017, Ms. Kilburn [a plaintiff] attended an annual brunch held at the Comaroffs’ house. Professor John Comaroff greeted Ms. Kilburn with a hug and a kiss on the cheek and began singling her out for unwanted attention; he placed his hand uncomfortably low on her back to guide her through the room, expressed disappointment that she was not drinking alcohol, and touched her lower back again when he returned with coffee.

When Ms. Kilburn went to leave the brunch, Professor Comaroff followed her. Ms. Kilburn bent to retrieve her bag, and when she stood, Professor Comaroff had moved close to her. He again hugged her forcibly and kissed her on the mouth without her consent. Ms. Kilburn pushed him away and wiped her mouth, only to find Professor Comaroff smiling at her.

I spared you the part where Comaroff allegedly pressed his face into a horrified student’s breasts and confessed his impotence. And, oh yeah — there are two others in the department, former department chairs, whom one might take such a complaint to, if they, too, were not allegedly sexual harassers.

ADVERTISEMENT

The lawsuit says the plaintiffs tried to seek redress from the university for over a decade, but numerous faculty members and administrators refused to help them. In the absence of aid from the university, one woman described a strategy of avoidance (which, by the way, is common among victims.) She dropped a required course taught only by Comaroff or his wife, Jean, also a prominent anthropologist, and shifted her academic focus. Such strategies were not always successful. The suit tells of a situation in which one victim saw Comaroff coming and tried to escape: As she held the door shut against him, he tried to force his way through.

The complaint describes profoundly disturbing behavior. Worse, I have heard it all before, from other students, at other universities.

The complaint goes on, and on, and on, as does the description of an elaborate cover-up. Jean Comaroff is at the center of a forceful defense, radiating outward to include a list of prominent names in anthropology nationwide. Because one part of that defense was the now mostly retracted letter of 38, one suspects that the puzzling narrative about an advising situation gone wrong may have originated with her.

Seventy-three Harvard faculty members, including the anthropologist Steven C. Caton, have responded with a letter of support for the students. But the letter of 38 gutted me, even though so many have now retracted their involvement. Why? Because so many of those people are my real friends, many of them feminists (I thought) whom I have known for decades.

ADVERTISEMENT

And now? I don’t know how to look you in the eye. I really, really don’t know how to look you in the eye.

The 34 who retracted issued a short statement saying they had not had all the information, something they might have thought about before they signed the initial letter. Early reporting explains that their objections to disciplining Comaroff were procedural and “based on a media report,” which seems to omit their failure, as a group, to ask for the facts. They say that they now understand that this failure harmed students. But what did they not do?

Apologize.

So, OK. This one is a real eye-opener because what Harvard has clarified is what I know to be true at every academic institution: It isn’t just the administration that covers these things up. It is the faculty. And we are all complicit if we do not begin to speak openly to our students about the realities of sexual harassment. We need to tell them who the harassers are. Name their names. And, although faculty members take training to prevent sexual harassment, students get no training on how to respond to it, except to put themselves in the precarious position of asking for help from people who are likely to gaslight them.

What should a student do when groped by a professor? Punch him in the face.

So I talked to my students this morning and told them what sexual harassment was, that they did not have to endure it, and that I would believe them if they came to me. I told them that if they were queer, trans, or of color, they were more likely to be targeted for harassment.

I also told them that I am a mandated reporter (I have a duty to report claims of sexual harassment), and that, if they wanted choices, I could show them how to access those choices. Then I asked for questions. One student asked how to distinguish between sexual harassment and innocent flirting.

ADVERTISEMENT

“A professor flirting is sexual harassment,” I said. “There is no such thing as innocent flirting aimed at a student by a member of the faculty.” Another student described a sensation familiar to many of us: freezing when groped. What to do?

I thought about it for a moment. “Punch him in the face,” I said. “Aim at the nose, because the impact will produce maximum pain and disfigurement, and you will be less likely to break your hand. Hit him as hard as you can because you may get in a lot of trouble, and you may not get a second chance.”

Because really, the big lie is that sexual harassers can be “handled.” The reality? You have nothing to lose.

This essay previously appeared on the author’s Substack, Political Junkie.

A version of this article appeared in the March 4, 2022, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Opinion Law & Policy Graduate Education Leadership & Governance Campus Safety
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Claire Bond Potter
Claire Bond Potter is a professor emeritus of history at the New School for Social Research, author of the Political Junkie Substack, and creator of Why Now?, a political-history podcast.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues
Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through paper that is a photo of an idyllic liberal arts college campus on one side and money on the other
Finance
Small Colleges Are Banding Together Against a Higher Endowment Tax. This Is Why.
Pano Kanelos, founding president of the U. of Austin.
Q&A
One Year In, What Has ‘the Anti-Harvard’ University Accomplished?

From The Review

Photo- and type-based illustration depicting the acronym AAUP with the second A as the arrow of a compass and facing not north but southeast.
The Review | Essay
The Unraveling of the AAUP
By Matthew W. Finkin
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome propped on a stick attached to a string, like a trap.
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Can’t Trust the Federal Government. What Now?
By Brian Rosenberg
Illustration of an unequal sign in black on a white background
The Review | Essay
What Is Replacing DEI? Racism.
By Richard Amesbury

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin