> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
News
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

Where the Buck Stopped in the UNC Fraud Scandal (Hint: Not at the Top)

By  Jack Stripling
October 13, 2017

With the conclusion of its investigation into the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the National Collegiate Athletics Association exhausted the last available measure of accountability for what was arguably the most pervasive academic fraud at a major research university in at least a generation.

The association’s report, which found no clear evidence of an academic rules violation, all but ensures that none of Chapel Hill’s top brass will ever be disciplined for a system of phony classes that helped Tar Heel athletes to remain academically eligible over an 18-year span. The university’s academic and athletics leaders, some of whom have retired or moved on, were largely unscathed by a scandal that mostly implicated lower-level employees.

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

With the conclusion of its investigation into the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the National Collegiate Athletics Association exhausted the last available measure of accountability for what was arguably the most pervasive academic fraud at a major research university in at least a generation.

The association’s report, which found no clear evidence of an academic rules violation, all but ensures that none of Chapel Hill’s top brass will ever be disciplined for a system of phony classes that helped Tar Heel athletes to remain academically eligible over an 18-year span. The university’s academic and athletics leaders, some of whom have retired or moved on, were largely unscathed by a scandal that mostly implicated lower-level employees.

Chapel Hill officials say they put their house in order years ago. Following a damning independent investigation, which was concluded in 2014, the university disciplined or fired seven people. The most senior among them was a Roberta (Bobbi) Owen, the senior associate dean for undergraduate education, who was barred from any future administrative duties but remains a distinguished professor of dramatic art.

No head coaches, vice presidents, or college deans were directly implicated, and none were punished for what Kenneth L. Wainstein, a longtime official of the U.S. Justice Department, described as a systemic failure of oversight at one of the nation’s most-prestigious public universities.

There were no professional consequences, for example, for Roy A. Williams, the head men’s basketball coach, who maintains he knew nothing of the scheme. Over the course of eight years, Mr. Williams’s players enrolled 167 times in the no-show classes. Almost half of the students who took the classes were athletes, even though they make up only 4 percent of the student body.

ADVERTISEMENT

Richard A. (Dick) Baddour, whose 14-year tenure as the university’s athletics director overlapped with most of the academic fraud, resigned in 2011 amid a different NCAA investigation of improper benefits and academic misconduct.

H. Holden Thorp, who was chancellor when the irregular classes came to light, has said he had no prior knowledge of the problem. He resigned of his own accord, in 2013, before the Wainstein report was released, and is now provost at Washington University in St. Louis, where he has long been viewed as the president’s heir apparent.

The NCAA’s findings on Friday reiterate the notion that blame for the scandal rests almost solely with two individuals: Deborah Crowder, a secretary and then manager in the department of African and Afro-American studies; and Julius E. Nyang’oro, who was then chairman of the department. Together, they devised what the Wainstein report described as a “shadow curriculum” of classes that required no attendance, no interaction with professors, and no coursework beyond a single paper that was consistently given high marks.

“Looking back from today, it is hard to understand how College officials allowed this oversight failure to happen,” Mr. Wainstein’s report says. “One can speculate that it may have been the product of inertia, a lack of management-level leadership and the acceptance of certain supposed truisms — e.g. that strong oversight cannot coexist with academic independence in an elite university or that such oversight is unnecessary in a school with traditions of academic and athletic excellence — that nobody questioned until it was too late.”

In a scandal that revealed poor management and lax oversight, very few people with significant management or oversight responsibilities were punished. Here is a list, based on UNC disclosures, of the people who have borne the brunt of the scandal’s fallout. Just two of them had six-figure salaries, and the median compensation of those most strongly implicated was less than $70,000.

ADVERTISEMENT

Fired

Brent Blanton

Mr. Blanton, who was an academic counselor to the women’s soccer team, among other roles, steered players toward classes that he knew to be “unorthodox at best,” according to the Wainstein report.

Ending salary: $69,943

Beth Bridger

Ms. Bridger — a director of academic support for athletes whose role included overseeing the football staff — was among two counselors who, in 2009, gave a PowerPoint presentation warning coaches that the no-show classes would likely end. The classes, the presentation said, had been “part of the solution” to keep athletes eligible because players “didn’t take notes” or “have to stay awake.”

Ending salary: $60,720

Jaimie Lee

Ms. Lee — an academic counselor for athletes, who focused on football — was a co-presenter of the infamous PowerPoint presentation.

Ending salary: $39,483

Travis Gore

Mr. Gore — an associate who worked in the department of African and Afro-American studies — handled administrative tasks, such as answering the phone and running office errands. He later assisted in scheduling fraudulent classes.

Ending salary: $32,703

Resigned

Jeanette M. Boxill

In email exchanges with others at the university, Ms. Boxill — an academic counselor to women’s basketball and a former ethics-center director at Chapel Hill — discussed the grades necessary to keep athletes eligible. In one instance, she wrote, “a D will be fine; that’s all she needs.”

Ending salary: $85,970

Timothy J. McMillan

Mr. McMillan, a senior lecturer in the department of African and Afro-American studies, signed grade sheets for classes he did not teach and “effectively knew what was happening,” according to the Wainstein report.

Ending salary: $46,040

Julius Nyang’oro

Mr. Nyang’oro, chairman of the department of African and Afro-American studies, helped perpetuate the scheme and taught some of the phony classes. He resigned as chairman of the department in 2011, as the fraud came to light. He retired in 2012.

Ending salary: $159,249

Disciplined

Roberta (Bobbi) Owen

Ms. Owen, senior associate dean for undergraduate education, admonished the chairman of the department of African and Afro-American studies for teaching as many as 300 independent studies in an academic year. But she never followed up, missing an opportunity to end the charade years before it was exposed. She has been permanently barred from administrative duties, but retains a faculty position.

Ending administrative salary: $143,128

Left Before Scandal Broke

Deborah Crowder

Ms. Crowder, a secretary and manager of the department of African and Afro-American studies, designed the so-called paper classes. While she had no faculty position, she graded students’ papers. She retired in 2009.

Ending salary: $36,130

Cynthia Reynolds

Ms. Reynolds, a former associate director of the Academic Support Program for Student-Athletes and head football counselor, left Chapel Hill in 2010. She steered athletes toward the phony classes. In a 2009 email, she expressed concern that Ms. Crowder’s retirement could hamper player eligibility. Ms. Reynolds is now an academic programs administrator at Cornell University’s School of Applied & Engineering Physics.

Ending salary at Chapel Hill: $69,451

Wayne Walden

Mr. Walden, an academic adviser for men’s basketball who retired in 2009, routinely called Ms. Crowder to arrange for players to have spots in courses that he knew to be irregular.

Ending salary: $84,902

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Athletics
Jack Stripling
Jack Stripling was a senior writer at The Chronicle, where he covered college leadership, particularly presidents and governing boards. Follow him on Twitter @jackstripling.
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin