Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    AI and Microcredentials
Sign In
Foes Were 'Gunning for Her'

Who Had a Say in Derailing Texas A&M’s Hiring of Kathleen McElroy?

By Zachary Schermele August 4, 2023
Photo-illustration of a collage of texts over a photo of the Texas A&M University campus
Illustration by The Chronicle; photo by Zoonar GmbH, Alamy

New hires are typically matters reserved for deans and a few others. Of course, when tenure is a factor, the process becomes a little more involved. A tenure committee makes recommendations. Trustees or regents review them and usually give the final yay or nay.

But a newly released cache of documents demonstrates how much the recruitment of Kathleen O. McElroy to revive Texas A&M University’s journalism program deviated from the norm.

According to the documents — some included in a university investigation

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

New faculty hires are typically matters reserved for deans, department chairs, and a few others. Of course, when tenure is a factor, the process becomes a little more involved. A tenure committee makes recommendations. Trustees or regents review them and usually give the final yay or nay.

But a newly released cache of documents demonstrates how much the recruitment of Kathleen O. McElroy to revive Texas A&M University’s journalism program deviated from the norm.

According to the documents — some included in a university investigation published Thursday, and some provided in response to a Chronicle public-records request — McElroy’s hiring process was thrust into disarray by people who normally have little to no role in such matters.

Her case is the latest in a trend worrying many faculty across the country, of politicians and other external actors taking an outsize interest — and, in some cases, directly meddling — in the work they do. McElroy’s case, which also raised allegations of racial and gender discrimination, escalated to the point that it sank the university’s president.

McElroy, a prominent Black journalist, had spent years at The New York Times and then held a tenured post leading the University of Texas at Austin’s journalism school.

Her background might recall a similar situation: Two summers ago, Nikole Hannah-Jones — also a woman, also Black, and also a New York Times journalist — found her hiring at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill derailed by conservative opposition. Hannah-Jones rejected Chapel Hill’s delayed offer of tenure and went to Howard University instead. McElroy ended up steering clear of the campus that once courted her, too.

Here are four key moments that reveal the many players who sought to have their say in her hiring at Texas A&M.

The Early Hopes — and Warning Signs

On the morning of May 11, José Luis Bermúdez, the now-former interim dean of Texas A&M’s College of Arts and Sciences, sent a budget request to N.K. Anand, vice president for faculty affairs. Bermúdez had a vision for re-establishing and expanding Texas A&M’s journalism program, and he had a star new recruit to lead the way: McElroy.

Once she was officially hired, Bermúdez wrote in the email, “we will have an instant and spectacular splash.”

ADVERTISEMENT

A splash is one way to describe it. Almost immediately, fears of outside reactions emerged.

The same evening, Bermúdez had dinner with M. Katherine Banks, the now-former president, text messages show.

In a text to Hart Blanton, the head of the journalism department, Bermúdez said he and Banks decided at the dinner to delay McElroy’s hiring until after the Texas Legislature’s 2023 regular session adjourned in late May.

“Bottom line is the NYT connection is poor optics during this particular legislative session,” Bermúdez wrote. He declined to comment for this story.

ADVERTISEMENT

As is often the case when courting star faculty, A&M had heavily recruited McElroy for several months. A search committee strongly recommended her as a candidate in April. By the time Banks decided to hit pause on McElroy’s hiring, a lot of people thought her new job was a done deal.

In texts to Bermúdez, Blanton said that department heads across the campus had already congratulated him about recruiting McElroy. So had the dean of UT-Austin’s journalism school.

“I think the train has left the station,” Blanton told Susan Ballabina, the chief external-affairs officer and senior vice president for academic and strategic collaborations, in a May 12 text.

Blanton did not respond to a request for comment. Banks could not be reached for comment.

A ‘Pretend’ News Site’s Story

Throughout the beginning of the summer, Texas A&M delayed the last steps of the hiring process, and McElroy was getting frustrated, documents show.

ADVERTISEMENT

On June 13, there was a public signing ceremony to share the news. At that point, everyone seemed to be on board: Banks and other higher-ups all signed off on bringing McElroy to campus for a tenured job, pending board approval. In an email the day after the ceremony, the college’s social-media coordinator called it one of the “most positively received stories” in his time in the marketing department.

Things changed two days after the event.

An article written by a Texas A&M student and published on the Texas Scorecard, a conservative website, described McElroy as a supporter of diversity, equity, and inclusion programs. That same day, Texas’ governor had signed a new law banning DEI offices at the state’s public colleges. Members of the A&M system’s Board of Regents started raising alarm bells, documents show.

On June 16, Bermúdez texted Blanton asking about “the author of that stupid article.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“It’s a pretend news site. I don’t know,” Blanton answered.

Half an hour later, Blanton told Bermúdez he’d just spoken to McElroy. She’d seen the article, but didn’t seem concerned about the “storm to come,” he said.

“I’m not clear if that’s because of her resolve or because she underestimates the storm,” he wrote.

The Regents React — and Intervene

Arguably, the storm had already arrived. On June 16, Jay Graham, a member of the Board of Regents, texted Banks and John Sharp, chancellor of the Texas A&M system.

ADVERTISEMENT

He said he’d seen the news about McElroy’s hiring and hoped it wasn’t true. “But since it is not April Fools’ Day, I assume it is,” he wrote.

“I thought the purpose of us starting a journalism department was to get high-quality Aggie journalist [sic] with conservative values into the market,” he wrote. “This won’t happen with someone like this leading the department.”

Michael V. Hernandez, another regent, put it bluntly in an email to Banks and Sharp a few days later: “Granting tenure to somebody with this background is going to be a difficult sell for many on the BOR.” Hernandez wrote that he saw the selection of McElroy, who had built her career in New York City and Austin, Tex., as “exactly the opposite of what we had in mind for someone in that position.”

On June 22, Blanton and Bermúdez were texting about the board’s focus on McElroy. Bermúdez mentioned a different faculty-job candidate, a white man. If he was hired, “nobody cares,” Bermúdez said. “The board will be about as interested as they are in the synchronized swimming team.”

ADVERTISEMENT

He added, “Kathleen comes here, and everybody takes note.”

On July 8, Bermúdez sent Blanton a past op-ed that McElroy had written. Blanton texted back: “She should probably anticipate that everything she said about race might be read back to her at the board meeting.”

Vickie Spillers, the executive director of the board, did not respond to a request for comment.

Conservative Groups Played a Key Role

As it turns out, McElroy wasn’t just a tough sell for the board. Two outside alumni groups — the Sul Ross Group and the Rudder Association, both of which have many conservative members — were “gunning for her” too, Bermúdez said in a July 8 text to Blanton.

ADVERTISEMENT

“They have no power of course,” he wrote. “But people who do have power listen to them.”

One of those people appeared to be Banks. In a text to the dean that same day, she said the two groups were “lining up to make a big deal about it.”

“Expect more press and awful emails,” she told Bermúdez.

The Rudder Association was formed in the summer of 2020 after protesters called for the university to remove a statue of a Confederate general from campus, according to The Battalion, Texas A&M’s campus newspaper. The Sul Ross Group, which didn’t respond to a request for comment on Friday, was named after the general, Lawrence Sullivan Ross.

ADVERTISEMENT

Matt Poling, the president of the Rudder Association, told The Chronicle on Friday that his group had been doing its own research into McElroy’s statements before the Texas Scorecard article was published on June 15.

“We expressed our concerns about the misalignment, given Dr. McElroy’s stated views on viewpoint discrimination and racial essentialism in journalism, and that was the extent of our involvement,” he said.

Any hopes of salvaging the deal fell apart by the second weekend in July. After her contract was diluted, McElroy would stay in her job at UT-Austin, she told The Texas Tribune.

A few days after the news dropped, the Rudder Association released a statement taking issue with comments from some faculty members, who were accusing the group of inappropriately interfering in their hiring processes.

ADVERTISEMENT

Regents and elected officials, the Rudder statement said, should not be viewed as examples of outside influence. Neither should taxpayers, tuition-payers, or donors, it said.

A former Rudder president, Joe Bourgeois, sent an email on July 15 to Spillers, the regents’ executive director. Bourgeois said he supported the regents’ questioning of McElroy’s background. “Despite some of the faculty claiming that only they have a say,” Bourgeois wrote, “the citizens of the state of Texas have the ultimate say and we support you as our representatives on the board.”

Megan Zahneis contributed reporting.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Political Influence & Activism Hiring & Retention
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Zachary Schermele
Zach Schermele is a reporting intern at The Chronicle. Follow him on Twitter @ZachSchermele, or send him an email at zachary.schermele@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues
Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through paper that is a photo of an idyllic liberal arts college campus on one side and money on the other
Finance
Small Colleges Are Banding Together Against a Higher Endowment Tax. This Is Why.
Pano Kanelos, founding president of the U. of Austin.
Q&A
One Year In, What Has ‘the Anti-Harvard’ University Accomplished?

From The Review

Photo- and type-based illustration depicting the acronym AAUP with the second A as the arrow of a compass and facing not north but southeast.
The Review | Essay
The Unraveling of the AAUP
By Matthew W. Finkin
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome propped on a stick attached to a string, like a trap.
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Can’t Trust the Federal Government. What Now?
By Brian Rosenberg
Illustration of an unequal sign in black on a white background
The Review | Essay
What Is Replacing DEI? Racism.
By Richard Amesbury

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin