Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
Equity

Why 2 Federal Lawmakers Decided to Target Legacy Admissions

By Sahalie Donaldson February 17, 2022
U.S. Sen. Jeff Merkley, an Oregon Democrat, is the sponsor in the Senate of a bill that would effectively ban legacy preferences in college admissions.
U.S. Sen. Jeff Merkley, an Oregon Democrat, is sponsoring a bill that would effectively ban legacy preferences in college admissions.Alex Wroblewski, Getty Images

Over recent years universities have faced growing challenges to the practice of legacy admissions which give already-privileged students another advantage in the college admissions process.

Critics say this decades-old practice is rooted in racism and creates another barrier for underrepresented students as it predominantly favors the white and wealthy children of alumni and donors. Urged forward by the national reckoning with racial injustice, resistance to the practice has grown among students, politicians, civil rights groups and even within campus leadership over the past few years.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

As colleges face calls to become more inclusive, one refrain has grown in popularity in recent years. Why not ban legacy admissions? By giving a boost to the children of alumni, critics charge, the practice only adds an additional barrier for the underrepresented students striving to navigate higher education.

On Capitol Hill, two Democratic lawmakers this month unveiled legislation to outlaw legacy preferences in admissions on many campuses. The bill’s passage is unlikely, at least for now, but its introduction signals how prominent a target legacy admissions has become in progressive circles.

Sen. Jeff Merkley, of Oregon, and Rep. Jamaal Bowman, of New York, say the bill is a sure-fire way to make the college-admissions process more equitable. “Every child … regardless of what community they live in, who is a focused individual wanting to explore the world and has worked hard in high school, should have a fair chance to apply and not have 10 or 25 percent of the seats set aside that are pre-allocated to the most privileged individuals,” Senator Merkley said in an interview with The Chronicle.

It never occurred to anyone around me to visit the campus, because who would have the money to go to another state?

Legacy policies vary by campus, and exact data on how many students benefit from legacy status is difficult to find. A recent Associated Press report found that at very selective colleges, 10 percent to 20 percent of incoming classes are made up of students with family ties to graduates.

Merkley, who was the first person in his family to attend college, recalled being bewildered when he arrived at Stanford University and learned that he was the only person in his dorm who hadn’t visited the campus before he enrolled.

“It never occurred to anyone around me to visit the campus, because who would have the money to go to another state?” said Merkley, who grew up in a blue-collar community in Oregon. “This is an example of how students who do not come from a background where college is discussed really are a long way from understanding the possibilities — how to apply, where to apply, and so forth.”

He says banning legacy admissions would be one step toward reducing the built-in advantages enjoyed by privileged students.

The Fair College Admissions for Students Act would require campuses that receive federal financial aid to ban legacy preferences from their admission policies. But it also creates a carve-out, giving the U.S. secretary of education the power to waive the ban for historically Black colleges and universities, tribal colleges, and minority-serving institutions. Universities could be exempted by submitting a waiver each year showing that use of a legacy preference helps historically underrepresented students get into those colleges.

In a statement, Representative Bowman said it’s important that principles of equity be enshrined in colleges’ policies. “We have to ensure our policies reflect equity and inclusion — including at our institutions of higher education. The legacy admissions practice, which disproportionately benefits rich, white, and connected students, and has anti-Semitic and anti-immigrant roots, creates another systemic barrier to accessing higher education for low-income students, students of color, and first-generation students,” he said.

But some experts have argued that ending legacy admissions would do little to improve diversity at colleges or improve lower-income students’ chances of being admitted. Catharine B. Hill, managing director of the consulting group Ithaka S+R, has argued in The Chronicle that selective colleges’ reliance on tuition and demonstrated preference for admitting wealthier students would be unaffected by a legacy ban.

But Senator Merkley said that even if such a ban wasn’t a silver bullet, it would still make a difference for some students.

“Maybe in the process of striking down the formalized systemic discrimination in favor of the privileged, maybe it will make the entire team at a college that thinks about how they review student applications more thoughtful about whether they also have nonformalized biases that they need to wrestle to address,” he said.

Public opinion has begun to swing against legacy admissions. The affirmative-action case involving Harvard University and the University of North Carolina at Chapel and the 2019 Operation Varsity Blues scandal have drawn attention to allegations of bias in admissions.

ADVERTISEMENT

“That really opened people’s eyes and exposed how inequitable the higher-education admissions process is to a lot of folks,” said Viet Andy Nguyen, founder of the nonprofit organization EdMoblizer, which urges an end to legacy admissions. “I think it made people much more willing to reassess the practices that have been accepted as the norm for the past few centuries.”

Some colleges, including the Johns Hopkins University and Amherst College, have responded by eliminating legacy preferences. Hopkins’s president wrote, in an op-ed in The Atlantic, that the step improved diversity in his institution’s student body by increasing the number of Pell Grant-eligible students while reducing those with legacy connections.

Colorado became the first state to ban legacy admissions at public universities in 2021. Connecticut’s legislature is considering a similar policy, and California passed a law in 2019 that requires colleges to disclose whether their admissions process favors legacy students.

Nguyen said he’s encouraged by the fact that even those who stand to benefit from legacy admissions are starting to oppose the practice in greater numbers. More than 1,000 alumni and students from over 30 different universities have signed onto an effort by EdMoblizer, pledging not to donate to colleges that consider legacy in admissions.

“I think the alumni, the students have a lot more say in how universities think about their policies than people realize,” Nguyen said. “Theoretically, alumni and students have an incentive to not speak up. They are doing so and saying that, ‘even though we benefit from this practice, we are rejecting it in the name of broader equity for society.”

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Law & Policy Admissions & Enrollment First-Generation Students
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Sahalie Donaldson
Sahalie Donaldson was a reporting intern at The Chronicle.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Vector illustration of large open scissors  with several workers in seats dangling by white lines
Iced Out
The Death of Shared Governance
Illustration showing money being funnelled into the top of a microscope.
'A New Era'
Higher-Ed Associations Pitch an Alternative to Trump’s Cap on Research Funding
Illustration showing classical columns of various heights, each turning into a stack of coins
Endowment funds
The Nation’s Wealthiest Small Colleges Just Won a Big Tax Exemption
WASHINGTON, DISTICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES - 2025/04/14: A Pro-Palestinian demonstrator holding a sign with Release Mahmud Khalil written on it, stands in front of the ICE building while joining in a protest. Pro-Palestinian demonstrators rally in front of the ICE building, demanding freedom for Mahmoud Khalil and all those targeted for speaking out against genocide in Palestine. Protesters demand an end to U.S. complicity and solidarity with the resistance in Gaza. (Photo by Probal Rashid/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Campus Activism
An Anonymous Group’s List of Purported Critics of Israel Helped Steer a U.S. Crackdown on Student Activists

From The Review

Illustration of an ocean tide shaped like Donald Trump about to wash away sandcastles shaped like a college campus.
The Review | Essay
Why Universities Are So Powerless in Their Fight Against Trump
By Jason Owen-Smith
Photo-based illustration of a closeup of a pencil meshed with a circuit bosrd
The Review | Essay
How Are Students Really Using AI?
By Derek O'Connell
John T. Scopes as he stood before the judges stand and was sentenced, July 2025.
The Review | Essay
100 Years Ago, the Scopes Monkey Trial Discovered Academic Freedom
By John K. Wilson

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin