Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    Hands-On Career Preparation
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    Alternative Pathways
Sign In
The Review

Why Colleges’ Liberal Lean Is a Problem

By Samuel J. Abrams March 5, 2017
Why Colleges’ Liberal Lean Is a Problem 1

In three New York Times columns on the ideological echo chamber in higher education, Nicholas Kristof argues that colleges “embrace diversity of all kinds except for ideological.”

Unsurprisingly, while Kristof drew support from professors on the right, many scholars rushed to denounce his conclusions and challenge his facts. Most recently, Aaron Hanlon, an English professor at Colby College, argued that Kristof “has an untenably narrow view of campus life and politics” and approvingly cites the City University of New York history professor Angus Johnston, who wrote: “the typical American college student today … doesn’t attend a tiny, insular liberal-arts college. The median American college student attends a public college, never lived in a dorm, isn’t studying liberal arts. There’s no liberal bubble.”

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

In three New York Times columns on the ideological echo chamber in higher education, Nicholas Kristof argues that colleges “embrace diversity of all kinds except for ideological.”

Unsurprisingly, while Kristof drew support from professors on the right, many scholars rushed to denounce his conclusions and challenge his facts. Most recently, Aaron Hanlon, an English professor at Colby College, argued that Kristof “has an untenably narrow view of campus life and politics” and approvingly cites the City University of New York history professor Angus Johnston, who wrote: “the typical American college student today … doesn’t attend a tiny, insular liberal-arts college. The median American college student attends a public college, never lived in a dorm, isn’t studying liberal arts. There’s no liberal bubble.”

While it is certainly true that the “typical college student” is no longer someone in her or his late teens studying the liberal arts on a leafy campus, the problem with these critiques is that they lack any systematic evidence about what politics and college life are actually like.

The empirical reality, today, is that colleges are overwhelmingly liberal, and that there is very little variation by institutional type and selectivity. The part-time older student at a large public university is being exposed to the same ideological leanings of professors as those students who reside in elite, leafy, small colleges.

Consider, from the Higher Education Research Institute’s national surveys of faculty members and students, that in 2014, 32 percent of first-year students considered themselves liberal or far left, compared with 60 percent of faculty members. That ratio of faculty-to-student political sentiment has increased since 1989, when the numbers were 24-percent liberal or far-left students to 41-percent for faculty members. That rise must have been at the expense of moderates, for in 1989, as now, there were few conservative faculty members. Meanwhile, the portion of the American populace at large that considers itself liberal or far left, 26 percent, is smaller even than that among students and has hardly changed in recent decades — it was 27 percent in 1989.

In other words, the data show that students are not the ones moving to the left. It’s the faculty. It follows, then — since it is faculty members who return year after year as students move on — that professors, not students, create the liberal bubble on campuses.

Liberal students and ideas are front and center in campus news coverage. Faculty members are usually an afterthought. But professors are the ones who help shape the students’ minds and set the tone for the intellectual climate. Their jobs include presenting long-term outlooks and contextualizing current events for their students. They influence, considerably, students’ reactions to President Trump, to the Republican Party, and to conservative policies.

When Kristof and others focus on a narrow group of small liberal-arts colleges, they miss the larger nationwide change in campus ideology. All types of colleges, public and private, elite and nonelite, have seen an increase in the proportion of liberal faculty members. The exceptions are religious colleges, which are less liberal in general and constitute 9 percent of colleges. It is simply incorrect to believe that some campuses have moved far left while others are more centrist and balanced. Almost all colleges, 91 percent, have seen an increase in the proportion of liberal faculty members.

Not only have the overall proportions of liberal faculty members risen since 2001 at both elite and nonelite colleges — with elite colleges defined as those among the 30 percent most selective in SAT scores — but the difference between the percentages of liberal faculty members on each kind of campus is small. In 2014 there was only a five-percentage-point difference, and even that gap has narrowed significantly over the past 25 years, again suggesting that the faculty shift to the left is a general and powerful phenomenon.

Collectively, these data make a strong case that ideological diversity on campuses nationwide is diminishing and under threat. The attacks against Kristof for focusing on narrow and particular cases may be legitimate insofar as he should have cast a wider net. But the thrust of his argument is no less valid, especially in light of these larger trends.

ADVERTISEMENT

Kristof is correct that we need more variety in viewpoints. Professors have every right to their political and ideological positions, but we should worry when the very places we hold as marketplaces of ideas have so little ideological balance. Ideology anchors a lot of academic thought, and a multiplicity of ideas sets the stage for intellectual progress. The liberal lean is a fact, not a theory, and it should be acknowledged and remedied.

Samuel J. Abrams is a professor of politics at Sarah Lawrence College and a research fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution.

A version of this article appeared in the March 10, 2017, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Samuel J. Abrams
Samuel J. Abrams is a professor of politics at Sarah Lawrence College and a visiting scholar at the American Enterprise Institute.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

Academe Is Overrun by Liberals. So What?
Social-Psychology Researchers Are Very Liberal. Is That a Problem?
Taking the Right Seriously

More News

Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through a flat black and white university building and a landscape bearing the image of a $100 bill.
Budget Troubles
‘Every Revenue Source Is at Risk’: Under Trump, Research Universities Are Cutting Back
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome topping a jar of money.
Budget Bill
Republicans’ Plan to Tax Higher Ed and Slash Funding Advances in Congress
Allison Pingree, a Cambridge, Mass. resident, joined hundreds at an April 12 rally urging Harvard to resist President Trump's influence on the institution.
International
Trump Administration Revokes Harvard’s Ability to Enroll International Students
Photo-based illustration of an open book with binary code instead of narrative paragraphs
Culture Shift
The Reading Struggle Meets AI

From The Review

Illustration of a Gold Seal sticker embossed with President Trump's face
The Review | Essay
What Trump’s Accreditation Moves Get Right
By Samuel Negus
Illustration of a torn cold seal sticker embossed with President Trump's face
The Review | Essay
The Weaponization of Accreditation
By Greg D. Pillar, Laurie Shanderson
Protestors gather outside the Pro-Palestinian encampment on the campus of UCLA in Los Angeles on Wednesday, May 1, 2024.
The Review | Conversation
Are Colleges Rife With Antisemitism? If So, What Should Be Done?
By Evan Goldstein, Len Gutkin

Upcoming Events

Ascendium_06-10-25_Plain.png
Views on College and Alternative Pathways
Coursera_06-17-25_Plain.png
AI and Microcredentials
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin