> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
Social Media
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

Why Did These Scholars Suddenly Find Their Twitter Accounts Suspended?

By  Chris Quintana
September 30, 2018
twitter0930
RomanOkopny, iStock

Updated (10/1/2018, 11:36 a.m.) with a response from Twitter.

It was Saturday morning, and Kevin Gannon was drinking coffee, watching some pregame college football, and posting a series of tweets about the only time a Supreme Court justice had been impeached. He said it felt timely given the Senate hearings this week and Christine Blasey Ford’s accusation of sexual assault against the Supreme Court nominee Brett M. Kavanaugh.

Gannon, a professor of history at Grand View University, in Des Moines, went to refill his coffee. When he returned, he found his Twitter account, with more than 40,000 followers, had been suspended. He told The Chronicle he’d received a message that his account had been frozen in connection to breaking some of the social-networking service’s rules, though it wasn’t clear what he had done wrong.

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

twitter0930
RomanOkopny, iStock

Updated (10/1/2018, 11:36 a.m.) with a response from Twitter.

It was Saturday morning, and Kevin Gannon was drinking coffee, watching some pregame college football, and posting a series of tweets about the only time a Supreme Court justice had been impeached. He said it felt timely given the Senate hearings this week and Christine Blasey Ford’s accusation of sexual assault against the Supreme Court nominee Brett M. Kavanaugh.

Gannon, a professor of history at Grand View University, in Des Moines, went to refill his coffee. When he returned, he found his Twitter account, with more than 40,000 followers, had been suspended. He told The Chronicle he’d received a message that his account had been frozen in connection to breaking some of the social-networking service’s rules, though it wasn’t clear what he had done wrong.

ADVERTISEMENT

He initially thought he might have been the target of an organized social-media campaign with the goal of suspending his account. Gannon is an active personality on Twitter, and he said he had been the subject of online harassment before, though he had never been reported or suspended, he said.

It wasn’t until later in the day that Gannon realized he was part of a larger group of academics who had been suspended. It wasn’t clear why their accounts had been temporarily taken down. Those suspended included Eleanor Parker, a lecturer in medieval English literature at the University of Oxford who tweets under the handle @ClerkofOxford, and Carl Robert Keyes, an associate professor of early American history at Assumption College, who directs @SlaveAdverts250.

Social-media accounts can be an invaluable tool for scholars trying to reach the public. For their accounts to be suspended without warning or reason is alarming, and may even be censorship of academic ideas.

Two theories emerged following the suspensions. Some suspected that a group of online trolls had organized a campaign to report accounts for violating Twitter’s terms of service and thereby get Twitter to suspend them. Another theory suggests a new Twitter policy, meant to curb discrimination, might have led to the suspended accounts. Gannon initially thought someone had targeted his account, but he has since changed his mind.

“I think we need to realize that this is the reality of our society,” Gannon said. “Algorithms have a lot of power, and the people writing those algorithms, or the companies producing them, thus have a lot of power too.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Twitter didn’t immediately return a journalist’s request for comment. Gannon appealed his suspension, and later that day his account was reactivated, he said. On Monday a spokesman wrote to The Chronicle by email that the accounts had been suspended in error by the company’s anti-spam technology, and that the accounts had been reinstated. He further said the policy on discriminatory content had not gone live yet, and that the company was still taking feedback as to how to put it in place.

Chris Peterson, an admissions officer, instructor, and researcher at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, appeared to be the first to offer the theory about an overaggressive algorithm.

Algorithms have a lot of power, and the people writing those algorithms, or the companies producing them, thus have a lot of power too.

His account, with about 1,700 followers, was also suspended on Saturday morning. It happened, he wrote in a blog post, after he published a message about women’s representation in the STEM fields throughout history.

Peterson, who referred The Chronicle to his blog when asked for comment, wrote that he suspected he was the casualty of a Twitter policy designed to curb “dehumanizing speech.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The new policy, according to an announcement from the company, aims to bar content that “dehumanizes others based on their membership in an identifiable group, even when the material does not include a direct target.”

So if someone were to type “all minorities are worthless,” that message could be grounds for suspension under the new policy.

Peterson said he supports Twitter’s efforts to curb harassment. The site has long been criticized for failing to do enough to prevent abuse, especially toward women and minorities.

“However, I also believe that the implementation of these policies and processes can’t be this dumb,” he wrote in the blog post. “I get that this is a really, really hard social and technical problem to solve. But any system that (apparently) flags feminist academic research about the social construction of scientific privilege as being abusive of women as a class is just not ready for production.”

Keyes told The Chronicle he started the account, Slavery Adverts 250, about two years ago as part of a class project. Every day the account tweets a picture of an old newspaper advertisement for the sale of slaves.

ADVERTISEMENT

Before its suspension, the account had about 2,650 followers. Keyes said he had encountered a troll here or there, but never anything noteworthy. That’s part of why he was surprised when he couldn’t schedule the day’s tweets on Saturday morning. Initially, he thought he was having a problem with the software he uses to program the tweets, so he logged out of his account, but when he tried to get back in, he found he had been blocked.

Confused, he posted a tweet on his personal account about the suspension.

This morning @Twitter suspended the @SlaveAdverts250 project that I have directed for more than two years. Please let @TwitterSupport know that @Twitter has made this decision in error.

— Carl Robert Keyes (@TradeCardCarl) September 29, 2018

Almost immediately, he said, his colleagues started sharing his message. The account was restored later on Saturday, but Keyes said he appreciated the ability of several historians to come together to quickly to solve the problem.

Though initially troubling, Keyes said, the suspension could be viewed as a positive development. Interest in the account has surged; Keyes said it had gained roughly 900 new followers since Saturday. The suspension and subsequent outcry also occurred right before Keyes was set to have students in his “Slavery and Freedom in Early America” course take over the account. He said allowing them to run the account gives them a chance to do work that is seen by not just him but a wider audience.

“When the class reconvenes this week,” Keyes said. “I will be showing them many of the tweets that were going out to demonstrate, ‘Look, here is the historical community rallying around this project.’”

ADVERTISEMENT

Chris Quintana is a staff reporter. Follow him on Twitter @cquintanadc or email him at chris.quintana@chronicle.com.

A version of this article appeared in the October 12, 2018, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Chris Quintana
Chris Quintana was a breaking-news reporter for The Chronicle. He graduated from the University of New Mexico with a bachelor’s degree in creative writing.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

  • What Happens in the Classroom No Longer Stays in the Classroom. What Does That Mean for Teaching?
  • How to Go Public, and Why We Must
  • Scholars Cry Foul at Their Inclusion on List of Academics Paid by Google
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin