Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    Hands-On Career Preparation
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    Alternative Pathways
Sign In
Advice

‘Why Do I Set Writing Deadlines That I Can’t Keep?’

Advice from an academic-productivity expert on how to realistically assess how long a manuscript will take you to finish.

By Rebecca Schuman January 26, 2023
Illustration of a woman thinking, with multiple clock faces and gears visible in her head
Matt Manley for The Chronicle

Note: In the “Are You Working?” series, a Ph.D. and academic-writing coach answers questions from faculty members and graduate students about scholarly motivation and productivity. This month’s questions arrived via Twitter and Facebook. Read her previous columns here.

Question: I’m just about to finish a chapter draft of my book project — or at least, I should be just about to finish it. Every week I think, “This shouldn’t take longer than three to four good workdays,” and then three to four good workdays go by, and the thing doesn’t seem any further along than it was before. What’s wrong with me?

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Note: In the “Are You Working?” series, a Ph.D. and academic-writing coach answers questions from faculty members and graduate students about scholarly motivation and productivity. This month’s questions arrived via Twitter and Facebook. Read her previous columns here.

Question: I’m just about to finish a chapter draft of my book project — or at least, I should be just about to finish it. Every week I think, “This shouldn’t take longer than three to four good workdays,” and then three to four good workdays go by, and the thing doesn’t seem any further along than it was before. What’s wrong with me?

Signed,
Tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow

Dear Macbeth,

Nothing. We all do this. We want so desperately to be done with a project (or a definitive section of one) that we set a “strict!” deadline that we’ve convinced ourselves is reasonable. When we fail to meet said deadline, we blame our own work ethic rather than the real culprit: an ill-thought-out deadline. Why do we do this repeatedly? Because admitting the actual number of work hours that it would take to reach the finish line might be so daunting as to prevent us from even starting the task in the first place.

So, “I can finish this in a weekend” (when “this” is actually three months’ worth of work) is a really common motivational fib we tell ourselves to get going. The good news: You did get closer to finishing than you were before you started those three to four good workdays.

The other good news: This process doesn’t have to be your own personal Sisyphean boulder. There is a way to figure out a reasonable, pragmatic estimate of the writing hours ahead of you. Here’s my five-step formula:

  • Step 1: Estimate how many total words you expect to write. Let’s say you are trying to finish a 7,500-word chapter.
  • Step 2: Then time how many minutes it takes you to draft 300 words. For our purposes here, I’ll assume it takes you 45 minutes.
  • Step 3: Divide the project’s rough word count (7,500) by 300. That means to finish this chapter, you’re going to need 25 chunks of time.
  • Step 4: Multiply 25 (chunks of time) by 45 (the number of minutes it takes you to write 300 words). Result: It’s going to take you 1,125 minutes to write the chapter.
  • Step 5: To give yourself a cushion (i.e., account for magical thinking), multiply 1,125 minutes by a factor of 1.75, for a total of roughly 1,969 minutes, or nearly 33 hours of writing time.

What you now have is a reliable assessment of your completion time. In our hypothetical, that 33 hours of work could be accomplished in three to four weeks, writing an hour or two a day, five days a week. Of course this exercise also involves you thinking — realistically! — about how many hours and days a week you can devote to this particular project. Maybe you can only dedicate two days a week. Writing two hours a day, twice a week, means you’ll be done in about eight weeks with this chapter.

If you’re like me and all of this math has given you a headache, take a breath. It’s going to be OK. Math may not be your strong suit, but do this exercise and you will have a practical timeline for finishing — based on your actual work habits and time available, rather than on wishful thinking.

Question: Do you have any tricks for conquering the dreaded blank page at the very beginning of a project?

Signed,
Blanking On a Pseudonym

Dear Blank,

Why yes. Yes, I do have a few tricks on this front. In fact, I have three:

ADVERTISEMENT

Email yourself a prompt, not unlike one you’d give your students. “Why is this interesting to you?” or something similar. Then set a timer for 10 minutes and respond to your own email message — quickly and without thinking about it too much. Once that second email hits your inbox, paste a copy of your response into a heretofore blank document. Voila, you’re no longer starting, you’re editing.

Take a dictation walk. That is, as you walk, dictate three minutes of random thoughts about your work into your phone. Everyone talks into earbuds all day now, so you won’t look weird. When you get back to your laptop, transcribe your note-to-self, and then copy and paste it into a blank document. Again, you’re on your way.

Trick yourself with an old draft. If you’re the kind of person who simply can’t stomach a blank screen, open up a document that’s already at an advanced stage. Scroll down and insert a little bracketed phrase to mark a new section (“NEW RANDOM CONTENT HERE”). Then free-write about your newest topic for 200-ish words. Eventually, you guessed it, copy and paste what you’ve written into a fresh document, as above.

For all three methods, the key is to circumvent the blank page rather than face it head-on. The irony is that, in avoiding it, you are facing it head-on — and conquering it.

ADVERTISEMENT

Question: For a long time I loathed my own scholarship. Thankfully, after a lot of consistent work and soul-searching, it no longer makes me cry or procrastinate. Progress! I’m proud of myself. But now it’s a new year and I’m wondering if I can maybe take it one step further: Is it possible for me to start … liking my scholarship? How?

Yours truly,
I like it, but do I like-like it?

Dear Like Actually,

It’s unfortunate how often academics seem to fall into two camps when it comes to their scholarship. There’s the “I want to set my own work on fire” crew versus the “I love the sound of my own voice so much I didn’t notice you’d fallen asleep an hour ago” folks. We need more of us to occupy a middle ground: some sort of beautiful golden mean where we realize that what we’re working on is fun, but we’re also self-aware enough to understand that it’s not (and we’re not) God’s gift to the world.

ADVERTISEMENT

My tip to help you reach that middle-ground nirvana: With every Big Argument in your work, imagine you’re teaching the topic to a classroom filled with slightly reticent but well-meaning advanced honors undergrads. It is your job to win them over. Why is the topic cool? How can you blow their developing minds with your insights?

For every chapter or section you write, come up with the very bare skeleton of a lesson plan about it. When you’re on a walk or a run (or otherwise spacing out), imagine yourself at the front of a classroom, working to ignite students about this particular argument.

I find that when I work to convince students about the intellectual value of some idea, I invariably convince myself as well that whatever we’re working on (even if it’s required content that I didn’t choose to teach) is the single most fascinating thing I’ve ever encountered.

You may do that already if you teach undergrads (and you probably do). Now it’s time to apply the same tactic to appreciate the value and interest of your own scholarship.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Scholarship & Research Personal Productivity Career Advancement
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Rebecca Schuman
Rebecca Schuman is a career instructor of English at the University of Oregon and an academic-productivity consultant. Read her previous columns on scholarly writing and work habits here.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Collage of charts
Data
How Faculty Pay and Tenure Can Change Depending on Academic Discipline
Vector illustration of two researcher's hands putting dollar signs into a beaker leaking green liquid.
'Life Support'
As the Nation’s Research-Funding Model Ruptures, Private Money Becomes a Band-Aid
Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through a flat black and white university building and a landscape bearing the image of a $100 bill.
Budget Troubles
‘Every Revenue Source Is at Risk’: Under Trump, Research Universities Are Cutting Back
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome topping a jar of money.
Budget Bill
Republicans’ Plan to Tax Higher Ed and Slash Funding Advances in Congress

From The Review

Photo-based illustration of the sculpture, The Thinker, interlaced with anotehr image of a robot posed as The Thinker with bits of binary code and red strips weaved in.
The Review | Essay
What I Learned Serving on My University’s AI Committee
By Megan Fritts
Illustration of a Gold Seal sticker embossed with President Trump's face
The Review | Essay
What Trump’s Accreditation Moves Get Right
By Samuel Negus
Illustration of a torn cold seal sticker embossed with President Trump's face
The Review | Essay
The Weaponization of Accreditation
By Greg D. Pillar, Laurie Shanderson

Upcoming Events

Ascendium_06-10-25_Plain.png
Views on College and Alternative Pathways
Coursera_06-17-25_Plain.png
AI and Microcredentials
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin