> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
The Review
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

Why History Matters

Making a persuasive case

By  Louis P. Masur
January 16, 2019
Why History Matters 1
Christophe Vorlet for The Chronicle

The decision of leaders at the University of Wisconsin at Stevens Point to eliminate the history major, among other humanities fields, recently became front-page news in The New York Times. One student asked, “What is a university without a history major?” The decision at Stevens Point is not just the story of one rural university facing problems. History enrollments are in steep decline at colleges across the country. By one estimate, the number of history degrees awarded between 2008 and 2017 dropped more than 30 percent, exceeding declines in any other field.

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

Why History Matters 1
Christophe Vorlet for The Chronicle

The decision of leaders at the University of Wisconsin at Stevens Point to eliminate the history major, among other humanities fields, recently became front-page news in The New York Times. One student asked, “What is a university without a history major?” The decision at Stevens Point is not just the story of one rural university facing problems. History enrollments are in steep decline at colleges across the country. By one estimate, the number of history degrees awarded between 2008 and 2017 dropped more than 30 percent, exceeding declines in any other field.

The reasons for the latest falloff are easy enough to imagine: More students have turned to courses and majors in STEM fields with an eye toward employment after college; as colleges began eliminating core or distribution requirements, fewer students were introduced to the history field; history departments became increasingly specialized in their course offerings, making the major less appealing to the broadest spectrum of students.

None of this is new, and it is incumbent on historians to provide historical perspective. A headline in the Times once reported, “Ignorance of U.S. History Shown by College Freshmen.” The date was April 4, 1943. The article bemoaned that “82 percent of the colleges of this country do not require the teaching of United States history for an undergraduate degree.” The results of a questionnaire administered to 7,000 college students showed, for example, that 25 percent did not know that Abraham Lincoln was president during the Civil War.

There is a foreignness to the past that we must seek to take on its own terms.

ADVERTISEMENT

While it is lamentable that Stevens Point is eliminating the history major, history has a long history of being ignored, in part because a persuasive case for why history matters has not always been made. Many Americans intuitively share Henry Ford’s irreverence for the past. “History is more or less bunk,” he said.

Studying the past has also lost credibility because of continuing culture wars over what should be taught. An attempt to write National History Standards for public schools in 1992 led to controversy over the amount of material devoted to figures such as George Washington, as opposed to, say, Harriet Tubman. More recently, the Texas State Board of Education decided not to eliminate a unit on Hillary Clinton and to emphasize that slavery played a central role in the Civil War. The teaching of the past is constantly changing, and, for some, this is reason enough to abandon the enterprise altogether.

An argument has to be made for why history matters, one that moves beyond the philosopher George Santayana’s well-worn adage that “those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it,” which seems mistaken at best. Time and again we remember the past and yet nonetheless seem to repeat it, whether going to war or shutting down the government.

One valuable insight into why the past matters comes not from a historian, but a novelist. In a memoir about his upbringing, Richard Ford writes, “entering the past is a precarious business since the past strives but always half-fails to make us who we are.” That seems right. We are not our parents, but we can see how we are related.

So too with the nation. We are not where we were 50, 100, or 200 years ago, but there is no doubt that the past speaks to us now. Just as we should want to know the history of our family to gain a sense of where we come from, so too should we want to know the history of the nation to grasp how we got here.

ADVERTISEMENT

We study history not because of proximity, but because of distance, because once upon a time people lived differently than we now live. There is a foreignness to the past that we must seek to take on its own terms.

At the same time, stories about the drama of life long ago might give us pause, a chance to contemplate our common humanity with those who came before. At its most purposeful, examining past lives can lead us to examine our own.

This returns us to the purpose of a college degree. “The function of the university,” proclaimed W.E.B. Du Bois, the first African-American to receive a doctoral degree from Harvard, “is not simply to teach breadwinning.” In embracing the vocational, universities such as Stevens Point are neglecting the educational.

Students should take STEM courses, but they should also be required to study history. In humanities courses, they learn to think critically, to write analytically, and to work across disciplinary lines. Students also hopefully develop empathy and understanding. This is part of what Du Bois meant when he called higher education the “adjustment between real life and the growing knowledge of life.” These are skills and traits that will prove beneficial regardless of a student’s vocational pursuits.

It is unlikely that the undergraduates in 1943, who could not identify Lincoln, knew that Lincoln said that “we cannot escape history.” He was not offering a reason for why history matters. Instead, he was looking to the future and the judgments that would be made about the past by those who studied it. “We shall be remembered in spite of ourselves,” he predicted. Not if history disappears from the curriculum.

ADVERTISEMENT

Louis P. Masur is a professor of American studies and history at Rutgers University at New Brunswick.

A version of this article appeared in the January 25, 2019, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Opinion
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin