Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    A Culture of Cybersecurity
    Opportunities in the Hard Sciences
    Career Preparation
Sign In
News

Why Incentives for Innovation Don’t Work

By Nancy Budwig October 21, 2018
Why Incentives  for Innovation  Don’t Work 1
Isabelle Cardinal for The Chronicle

It’s that time of year again: Faculty members are back teaching, and administrators are coaxing them to take part in yet another strategic initiative to inspire classroom innovation or curricular reform. Many colleges try, unsuccessfully, to get faculty to “buy in” by offering them incentives, including financial ones. But what if incentives don’t work? What alternatives are available?

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

It’s that time of year again: Faculty members are back teaching, and administrators are coaxing them to take part in yet another strategic initiative to inspire classroom innovation or curricular reform. Many colleges try, unsuccessfully, to get faculty to “buy in” by offering them incentives, including financial ones. But what if incentives don’t work? What alternatives are available?

As a psychology professor who studies human development and learning, a former administrator, and a senior fellow at the Association of American Colleges & Universities, I have participated in curricular innovations both at my institution, Clark University, and elsewhere. I can say with confidence that framing innovation in terms of incentives does not work, and, in fact, typically backfires.

2018 Innovators: 6 Programs to Change Classroom Culture - Cover
2018 Innovators: 6 Programs to Change Classroom Culture
What drives change in the classroom? This special report looks at how six institutions encourage innovation in teaching.
  • Faculty Members Can Build Relationships With Online Students. Here’s How.
  • How to Make Your Residence Halls Work Year-Round
  • We Must Help First-Generation Students Master Academe’s ‘Hidden Curriculum’
  • Teaching With an Index Card: the Benefits of Free, Open-Source Tools

Extensive literature suggests that incentives create short-term change only — at best. Numerous studies in labs, educational settings, and business organizations have shown that incentives lead to diminished creativity and declining interest among participants, and point to the importance of intrinsic, rather than extrinsic, motivation. When incentives become the focus, too often the deep work necessary to produce sustained curricular change is ignored, and the rewards mask the barriers to success.

If incentives don’t work, then, what will? My work, rooted in both theory and practice, reveals three things that are essential to bringing individuals into the circle of change: autonomy, guidance, and a sense of social community, or working toward a larger meaningful goal.

I’ve found that combining the above factors in ways that shape a culture of learning can fuel positive efforts. One important step is to establish spaces where democratic and desirable solutions are discussed. Various kinds of learning communities and idea labs are excellent ways to find, share, and apply new ideas for change. Individuals are most creative when provided space to follow their interests without sanction, when support and guidance are readily available, and when social community is fostered.

We used these key features at Clark to develop and implement a new curricular framework, known as LEEP, which took effect in 2012. The Liberal Education and Effective Practice program enables undergraduates to apply their liberal education beyond the classroom. Part of this work has involved adding “Problems of Practice” courses and a required universitywide capstone experience, both of which provide students opportunities to integrate, apply, and demonstrate their learning and to work on complex projects that do not have tidy solutions and may continue after the semester ends. Fostering such practices required faculty members to develop new teaching pedagogies. We brought together groups of faculty members (and, eventually, staff members) to create communal resources based on identified needs. We continue to share experiences and develop materials that help advance the university’s agreed-upon learning outcomes in our courses.

Motivational psychology has suggested that individuals need space to work in ways that fuel their passions and allow them to take risks, make mistakes, and express creativity. To that end, Clark created a series of learning communities, called the Exemplar Project, which gave faculty and staff members the time and space they needed to put the LEEP curriculum into action. For instance, different learning communities focused on how the LEEP curriculum was being carried out in individual majors, in first-year seminars, and in the capstone experience. This work was not smooth, and often seemed to move backward rather than forward. But over the course of several years it evolved into the curricular framework we use today.

Cultivating and sustaining faculty work on our curricular reform efforts took a significant amount of support and guidance. In my role as associate provost, I acted as more of a resource than a salesperson whose job it was to get faculty members to buy into an already formulated plan of how to teach. I developed open-ended tools that allowed new communities to build upon the work of prior groups. Because the work of these communities was cumulative, it did not require an extensive time commitment from any one individual.

To bring people to the table and keep them there, it is crucial to make participants feel they are part of a larger effort, working toward a shared goal. Learning is social. At Clark, we established networked communities to help professors from different disciplines share innovative pedagogies and ideas for leading student work on group projects.

In recent years, when working with other colleges, I have also encountered faculty members who have embraced innovation for reasons other than incentives. The Pratt Institute invited me to facilitate workshops as part of an interdisciplinary collaboration in which professors conduct research related to teaching and experiment with new practices. This multiyear initiative — driven in part by the art and design interests of many faculty members — has fostered a community of risk-taking and created a space for faculty to discuss what has worked and what has not. For example, faculty members in the studio arts formed a learning community that inspired them to test new ways to evaluate student work. One faculty member from graphic design discovered from colleagues in interior design that the desk critique — an informal critique of a project in progress, carried out in a student’s work space — can create a deeper teaching connection because it implies that there is something special about where a student works.

Across the nation, colleges and organizations like AAC&U are creating spaces that encourage scholars to explore and share ideas for innovation in teaching. Conferences and summer institutes can provide the autonomy, guidance, and sense of belonging that can lead to innovative curricular design. AAC&U recently co-sponsored, with Wagner College, a “reunion conference” that reconvened faculty members from Clark and from Allegheny, Bard, Spelman, Wagner, and Wheaton Colleges who took part in an earlier consortium that focused on cultivating faculty leadership for curricular reform. Participants spent two days discussing the opportunities and challenges associated with their colleges’ efforts. Again, it was apparent that incentives were not the motivator for curricular innovation. What sparked commitment among these faculty members was the fact that they were part of a wider movement in higher education.

Don’t get me wrong. Offering faculty incentives, whether in the form of payment or time away from teaching to work on new pedagogies, is not necessarily problematic when framed properly. But classroom innovation should be driven by much more. A free lunch goes a long way, but never far enough.

Nancy Budwig is professor of psychology and former associate provost at Clark University, and a senior fellow at the Association of American Colleges & Universities.

A version of this article appeared in the October 26, 2018, issue.
Read other items in 2018 Innovators: 6 Programs to Change Classroom Culture.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Innovation & Transformation
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Harvard University
'Deeply Unsettling'
Harvard’s Battle With Trump Escalates as Research Money Is Suddenly Canceled
Photo-based illustration of a hand and a magnifying glass focusing on a scene from Western Carolina Universiy
Equal Opportunity
The Trump Administration Widens Its Scrutiny of Colleges, With Help From the Internet
Santa J. Ono, president of the University of Michigan, watches a basketball game on the campus in November 2022.
'He Is a Chameleon'
At U. of Michigan, Frustrations Grew Over a President Who Couldn’t Be Pinned Down
Photo-based illustration of University of Michigan's president Jeremy Santa Ono emerging from a red shape of Florida
Leadership
A Major College-President Transition Is Defined by an About-Face on DEI

From The Review

Illustration showing a valedictorian speaker who's tassel is a vintage microphone
The Review | Opinion
A Graduation Speaker Gets Canceled
By Corey Robin
Illustration showing a stack of coins and a university building falling over
The Review | Opinion
Here’s What Congress’s Endowment-Tax Plan Might Cost Your College
By Phillip Levine
Photo-based illustration of a college building under an upside down baby crib
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Must Stop Infantilizing Everyone
By Gregory Conti

Upcoming Events

Ascendium_06-10-25_Plain.png
Views on College and Alternative Pathways
Coursera_06-17-25_Plain.png
AI and Microcredentials
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin