Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    AI and Microcredentials
Sign In
News

Why Internet Scholars Are Calling Out Facebook for Restricting Access to Its Data

By Nell Gluckman May 9, 2018

After news broke in March that a scholar had harvested data about millions of Facebook users and shared it with Cambridge Analytica, a political-consulting firm that advised the Trump campaign, the social-media company made some changes.

The Facebook founder and chief executive Mark Zuckerberg testifies at a hearing of the U.S. House Committee on Energy and Commerce. The social-media giant recently announced restrictions on who can mine information it collects for research. Some academics say that’s a problem.
The Facebook founder and chief executive Mark Zuckerberg testifies at a hearing of the U.S. House Committee on Energy and Commerce. The social-media giant recently announced restrictions on who can mine information it collects for research. Some academics say that’s a problem.Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images

Facebook announced plans to restrict outsiders’ access to user information. It also said that a select group of scholars would be granted unprecedented access to its data in a project that will be partly overseen by the Social Science Research Council.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

After news broke in March that a scholar had harvested data about millions of Facebook users and shared it with Cambridge Analytica, a political-consulting firm that advised the Trump campaign, the social-media company made some changes.

The Facebook founder and chief executive Mark Zuckerberg testifies at a hearing of the U.S. House Committee on Energy and Commerce. The social-media giant recently announced restrictions on who can mine information it collects for research. Some academics say that’s a problem.
The Facebook founder and chief executive Mark Zuckerberg testifies at a hearing of the U.S. House Committee on Energy and Commerce. The social-media giant recently announced restrictions on who can mine information it collects for research. Some academics say that’s a problem.Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images

Facebook announced plans to restrict outsiders’ access to user information. It also said that a select group of scholars would be granted unprecedented access to its data in a project that will be partly overseen by the Social Science Research Council.

The scholars will not be able to publish that information, but they will learn what the company will and won’t share with outside researchers and, presumably, why. They will then serve as a filter, meting out the data to researchers whose projects will seek to answer one question: How have social media influenced democracy?

Those announcements may sound like welcome changes to social-media users worried about their privacy. User data will be less accessible to outside companies and researchers who may have nefarious intentions, but trustworthy scholars will still be able to tap into the endless trove of information.

That’s the theory, at least. But some scholars of the internet say the new restrictions are actually a problem.

A group of those scholars last month published an open letter sounding the alarm. They also created a document listing research papers that would not exist, they say, under the new restrictions Facebook has imposed on the use of its data.

The Chronicle recently spoke to the author of the letter, Axel Bruns, a professor of communication and media studies at the Queensland University of Technology, in Brisbane, Australia. Bruns is also president of the Association of Internet Researchers. The interview has been edited for clarity and length.

Q. What, in your view, is the problem with Facebook’s changes?

A. Following the Cambridge Analytica scandal and the revelations about how data might have been misused, Facebook has closed down or reduced a lot of the capabilities of the API [application programming interface, the tool that allows researchers seeking data to interact directly with Facebook’s servers]. It reduces the capabilities for commercial users and researchers to do work on Facebook.

To give you an example, what’s being restricted is some of the ability to gauge the circulation of particular URLs on Facebook. They’ve restricted the ability to track URLs to see how far they’ve been disseminated. That makes it a lot more difficult to assess the spread of information.

ADVERTISEMENT

Facebook also announced a collaboration with the Social Science Research Council and a group of foundations based mainly in the United States. The initiative is framed around elections and democracy. It seems that they are putting in place a panel of experts constituted in some way that’s not entirely transparent. That panel will define the research agenda for this initiative. That panel of experts will design this agenda and then call for submissions for research projects that will be assessed for potential funding.

In a sense that’s very welcome. At the same time, if it’s only elections and democracy, that shrinks the breadth of the research being done.

All of this positions Facebook as even more of an information broker, even more of a gatekeeper. That’s something we find very problematic.

All of this positions Facebook as even more of an information broker, even more of a gatekeeper. That’s something we find very problematic because a lot of the issues that researchers tend to recognize may not be recognized as issues by Facebook.

ADVERTISEMENT

Q. What are you and other internet researchers doing to push back?

A. When the first reports came out about these changes to the API and the Social Science Research Council thing later, quite a few of us were concerned by what that would mean for Facebook research.

Anja Bechmann, a colleague at Aarhus University, in Denmark, set up an open Google Doc. It lists research that had been done that would no longer be possible with the changes to the API. We followed up by writing this open letter that was really outlining this issue.

We gradually invited a number of researchers from around the world to sign. Something like five past, present, and future presidents of the Association of Internet Researchers participated, with a very significant group of senior leaders in our community. That ended up being those first 27 or so signatories. We’ve had 250 additional signatories.

ADVERTISEMENT

Q. What type of research is listed in the Google Doc?

A. It’s a real mix. It spreads out from the obvious things around news, journalism, and politics — people doing large-scale studies of particular elections, how news and information spreads across the network — then all the way through to things like health research — trying to pick up identifiers of unhealthy behavior, self-harm, excessive use of alcohol, depression.

There’s computer-science work that’s less interested in the content and more in the patterns of activity: How do people use social media? How do they interact on social media? Do they naturally form cliques of interactions that are disconnected from the rest of the network, or to what extent are they permeable from the rest of the network? What are people who aren’t scholars or journalists actually doing with social media? Is it for socializing? How does it influence social relationships?

Q. Referring to the new restrictions Facebook announced, your open letter says, “These changes are as much about strengthening Facebook’s business model of data control as they are about actually improving data privacy for users.” What do you mean by that?

ADVERTISEMENT

A. They talk about a lot of the changes as strengthening privacy. That’s obviously welcome if that’s really the motivation. At the same time, they’re not going to shut out the commercial partners that they’ve got. Large market-research companies are still able to pay for the data. That intermediate market of companies and researchers who have arisen around midscale use of Facebook data — that’s going to be reduced and shut out. Ultimately it means that in order to do any larger-scale work with Facebook, you have to partner with Facebook itself.

It’s able to really lock out any larger-scale research that is addressing issues that Facebook might not want to address. It can pick friendly researchers. It can pick commercial entities that might do the right type of work. It enables Facebook to really control that choice much more.

Q. What, in your view, is a better way to protect users’ privacy but also give researchers access to data?

A. Facebook and other platforms have provided, undifferentiated, the API to people who want to get access to Facebook data. There’s no difference between access for research purposes and for other purposes.

ADVERTISEMENT

If you have a researcher coming in who has ethical clearance from a national review board or their institution, their research has been reviewed for ethical implications. Restrictions are in place for how they will handle the data. If you’re doing research for the public interest and intend to be independent from Facebook, then that’s a different case than a developer coming in to build a platform that connects with Facebook data. Scholarly research needs to be treated differently from other commercial uses.

Nell Gluckman writes about faculty issues and other topics in higher education. You can follow her on Twitter @nellgluckman, or email her at nell.gluckman@chronicle.com.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Technology Innovation & Transformation
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Gluckman_Nell.jpg
About the Author
Nell Gluckman
Nell Gluckman is a senior reporter who writes about research, ethics, funding issues, affirmative action, and other higher-education topics. You can follow her on Twitter @nellgluckman, or email her at nell.gluckman@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

Facebook Says It Will Help Academics Use Its Data. Here’s How That’s Supposed to Work.

More News

Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues
Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through paper that is a photo of an idyllic liberal arts college campus on one side and money on the other
Finance
Small Colleges Are Banding Together Against a Higher Endowment Tax. This Is Why.
Pano Kanelos, founding president of the U. of Austin.
Q&A
One Year In, What Has ‘the Anti-Harvard’ University Accomplished?

From The Review

Photo- and type-based illustration depicting the acronym AAUP with the second A as the arrow of a compass and facing not north but southeast.
The Review | Essay
The Unraveling of the AAUP
By Matthew W. Finkin
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome propped on a stick attached to a string, like a trap.
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Can’t Trust the Federal Government. What Now?
By Brian Rosenberg
Illustration of an unequal sign in black on a white background
The Review | Essay
What Is Replacing DEI? Racism.
By Richard Amesbury

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin