Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    AI and Microcredentials
Sign In
Beleaguered Agencies

Why It Matters That Trump Wants to Kill the NEA and NEH

By Lee Gardner March 17, 2017
The National Endowments for the Arts and the Humanities have support in Congress, in part because the agencies disburse money to local projects across the country. Above, William D. (Bro) Adams, chairman of the humanities endowment, tours the Portland, Maine, Museum of Art.
The National Endowments for the Arts and the Humanities have support in Congress, in part because the agencies disburse money to local projects across the country. Above, William D. (Bro) Adams, chairman of the humanities endowment, tours the Portland, Maine, Museum of Art.Portland Press Herald via Getty Images

The National Endowments for the Arts and the Humanities are no strangers to the political crosshairs. And it came as little surprise to many scholars that President Trump would propose to eliminate them in his first budget.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

The National Endowments for the Arts and the Humanities have support in Congress, in part because the agencies disburse money to local projects across the country. Above, William D. (Bro) Adams, chairman of the humanities endowment, tours the Portland, Maine, Museum of Art.
The National Endowments for the Arts and the Humanities have support in Congress, in part because the agencies disburse money to local projects across the country. Above, William D. (Bro) Adams, chairman of the humanities endowment, tours the Portland, Maine, Museum of Art.Portland Press Herald via Getty Images

The National Endowments for the Arts and the Humanities are no strangers to the political crosshairs. And it came as little surprise to many scholars that President Trump would propose to eliminate them in his first budget.

Still, the president’s plan is a stark statement of his values and, in it, campus and scholarly leaders see an attack on intellectual inquiry.

“This administration is saying we do not value the study and research in fields like history and literature,” says Rosemary G. Feal, executive director of the Modern Language Association. “We do not value the arts. We do not value educational opportunities for large swaths of Americans.”

This administration is saying we do not value the study and research in fields like history and literature.

Mr. Trump’s budget functions as a signal to his base, says David A. Smith, a senior lecturer in history at Baylor University who has conducted research on the NEA. “If the president comes out swinging at the NEA, it’s to score credibility points with groups that want to see it gone,” he says. Opposing an agency like the NEA appeals both to those who object to it “from a cultural standpoint, because they don’t support what it does, and from a libertarian standpoint, because the government shouldn’t be doing stuff like this.”

No other president has specifically proposed eliminating the NEA and NEH before, although both endowments have been repeated targets of fiscal and social conservatives in Congress and in the White House. Created by an act signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson in 1965, the two endowments operated in relative quiet until 1981, when President Ronald Reagan’s budget director called them out as superfluous federal activity and an easy savings.

The agencies came under fire again in the late 1980s when Republicans in Congress proposed eliminating federal money for the National Endowment for the Arts based on its support for controversial artists such as Andres Serrano and Robert Mapplethorpe.

Mr. Trump may not see the value of spending about $148 million a year each on both the National Endowment for the Arts and the National Endowment for the Humanities, but there are indications Congress disagrees and that, in the end, the president’s stance may not translate into any policy change.

A group of 25 Democratic and Republican senators sent a letter to the president last month expressing their support for continued funding of the two cultural endowments.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sen. Lisa Murkowski, Republican of Alaska, said in a statement to The Chronicle that she believed “we can find a way to commit to fiscal responsibility while continuing to support the important benefits that NEA and NEH provide.”

Stephen Kidd, executive director of the National Humanities Alliance, an advocacy group, said that “the feedback we’ve been getting from those who have been talking with members of Congress is that support remains quite high” for funding the agencies.

There is at least one practical reason that the NEA and NEH may enjoy bipartisan support. “Congress realizes that these agencies spread money around the country to all these different districts, and they’re beneficial to a lot of people,” says Donna M. Binkiewicz, a lecturer in history at California State University at Long Beach who wrote a book about the NEA.

What the End Would Mean

What would it mean if the NEA and NEH were eliminated? The ramifications would be felt on campuses across the country.

ADVERTISEMENT

The nearly $300 million appropriated for the two agencies for the 2016 fiscal year is disbursed across all 50 states, with much of it going to state arts and humanities councils. A portion of the money makes its way to individual colleges, and it finances a wide array of projects.

At Duke University, for example, NEH funds have been used to broaden graduate-school training to include preparation for nonacademic careers, and for museum exhibitions and library projects, among other uses. Relatively small amounts of funding can create an outsized impact, says Richard H. Brodhead, Duke’s president.

NEA and NEH money can also function as a multiplier. Many grant recipients use an agency’s seal of approval as a basis to solicit matching funds from charitable foundations, often at a rate of three private dollars for each federal dollar, according to Lea Jacobs, associate vice chancellor for research for arts and humanities at the University of Wisconsin at Madison.

Ms. Jacobs has sat on NEH review panels, and says the process rigorously and impartially vets the projects that receive grants, saving potential donors the trouble. “If you get NEH funding, that makes people sit up and take notice,” she says.

ADVERTISEMENT

The threat of losing federal support for the arts and humanities could have an equally disproportionate effect. Many projects would “have to be funded privately, or not happen,” Ms. Jacobs says. Given the recent strains on all sources of funding for the arts and humanities, not happening might be the more likely outcome. “You don’t imagine research projects that you could never fund,” she says. Defunding the national endowments would have “a depressive effect on what research or publishing projects are attempted.”

Losing the money doled out each year by the NEA and NEH, especially the former, would have effects that extend far beyond campuses. Arts organizations in major cities would probably weather the loss of NEA funds, says Ms. Binkiewicz of Cal State Long Beach. “The people who would be hurt the most are people in small towns and rural areas, in small schools or poorer districts, where there really isn’t a lot of other funding for these kinds of activities.”

Lee Gardner writes about the management of colleges and universities, higher-education marketing, and other topics. Follow him on Twitter @_lee_g, or email him at lee.gardner@chronicle.com.

A version of this article appeared in the March 31, 2017, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Law & Policy Political Influence & Activism
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Gardner_Lee.jpg
About the Author
Lee Gardner
Lee Gardner writes about the management of colleges and universities. Follow him on Twitter @_lee_g, or email him at lee.gardner@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues
Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through paper that is a photo of an idyllic liberal arts college campus on one side and money on the other
Finance
Small Colleges Are Banding Together Against a Higher Endowment Tax. This Is Why.
Pano Kanelos, founding president of the U. of Austin.
Q&A
One Year In, What Has ‘the Anti-Harvard’ University Accomplished?

From The Review

Photo- and type-based illustration depicting the acronym AAUP with the second A as the arrow of a compass and facing not north but southeast.
The Review | Essay
The Unraveling of the AAUP
By Matthew W. Finkin
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome propped on a stick attached to a string, like a trap.
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Can’t Trust the Federal Government. What Now?
By Brian Rosenberg
Illustration of an unequal sign in black on a white background
The Review | Essay
What Is Replacing DEI? Racism.
By Richard Amesbury

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin