Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    Student Housing
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
The Chronicle Review

Why Read Book Reviews?

By Jeffrey N. Wasserstrom September 4, 2011
Why Read Book Reviews? 1
Tim Foley for The Chronicle Review

Each year in midsummer, I head to North Carolina to spend time with family and friends in a rented beach house. Many things during this period set life apart from other times. I spend lots more time than usual lolling in the ocean and eating shrimp. And I read more book reviews. In fact, aside from online reports about China and whodunits, reviews are about all I read.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Each year in midsummer, I head to North Carolina to spend time with family and friends in a rented beach house. Many things during this period set life apart from other times. I spend lots more time than usual lolling in the ocean and eating shrimp. And I read more book reviews. In fact, aside from online reports about China and whodunits, reviews are about all I read.

This is because a friend who joins us at the beach subscribes to the Times Literary Supplement (TLS) and is good enough to haul stacks of old issues down with him. A typical North Carolina day finds me alternating among swimming, eating, reading a mystery by Rendell or Rankin, and happily devouring TLS reviews.

Most years I haven’t thought much about this summertime narrowing of my normally far more varied literary diet. I know that I enjoy stylish reviews of the TLS sort, just as I enjoy well-crafted mysteries. And I leave it at that.

This year was different because of two online essays I read not long before heading to the beach. One was Elizabeth Gumport’s “Against Reviews” (n + 1, June 23), a witty call for a moratorium on book reviews, which the author derides as a form whose shelf life has expired. The other was a response by Tom Lutz, editor of the newly launched Los Angeles Review of Books. That piece, which appeared online on June 25 and was titled “Odious and Unpleasant” but could just as well have been called “For Reviews,” made the case, in prose as witty as Gumport’s, for the enduring value of the form.

Thinking back on this exchange while in North Carolina, I was struck by two things. First, I’m on Lutz’s side in the debate. How could I not be when I’m fond of reading and writing reviews, and I’m a contributor to and Asia editor of his Los Angeles Review? Second, my feelings about reviews, which I admit may be idiosyncratic, differ from Lutz’s in many ways.

For example, he writes as though the typical review focuses on a novel. Yet most of the ones I write aren’t about works of fiction. And most of those I read are about nonfiction books.

Lutz also assumes that people gravitate toward reviews of the kinds of books they read, just as they are most likely to seek out assessments of restaurants that serve cuisines they enjoy. And yet, though I’m addicted to noir novels, I generally give reviews of them a wide berth, partly because of a superstitious fear that reviewers will give away twists.

Another way my thinking diverges from Lutz’s relates to his emphasis on positive reviews’ influencing sales. Of course they can, especially if someone as influential as, say, Michiko Kakutani (whose New York Times reviews I often enjoy) or Margaret Atwood (whose New York Review of Books essays I never skip) is the one singing a book’s praises. When I write reviews, though, I often assume that most people reading me will not even consider buying the book I’m discussing, even if I enthuse. And as a reader, I gravitate toward reviews of books I don’t expect to buy, no matter how warmly they are praised.

Consider the most recent batch of TLS issues. As usual, I skipped the reviews of mysteries, even though these are precisely the works of fiction I tend to buy. And I read reviews of nonfiction books that I wasn’t contemplating purchasing. For instance, I relished a long essay by Toby Lichtig (whose TLS contributions I’d enjoyed in the past) that dealt with new books on vampires. Some people might have read the essay to help them decide which Dracula-related book to buy. Not me. I read it because I was curious to know what’s been written lately about vampires—but not curious enough to tackle any book on the topic.

What’s true regarding vampires is—I should perhaps be ashamed to say—true of some big fields of inquiry. Ancient Greece and Rome, for example. I like to know what’s being written about them but rarely read books about them. Instead, I just read Mary Beard’s lively TLS reviews of publications in her field.

ADVERTISEMENT

Reviews do influence my book buying—just in a roundabout way. I’m sometimes inspired to buy books by authors whose reviews impress me. I don’t think Lichtig has a book out yet, but when he does, I’ll buy it. The last book on ancient Greece I purchased wasn’t one Mary Beard reviewed but one she wrote.

Finally, there’s the issue of length. Lutz, while taking issue with many of Gumport’s claims, accepted her dissing of very short reviews. I’m prepared to defend them. Yes, short reviews are often unsatisfying, especially if they’re the thumbs-up/thumbs-down type. I’m no more ready to banish them from the universe of reviews, however, than to say that sonnets are necessarily better than haiku. (Or, since I’m enough of a philistine to prefer poetry that can be sung, to accept that long songs are always better than short ones—at least until I hear a lengthy ballad of heartbreak that’s more moving than J.D. Souther’s minimalist “Faithless Love.”)

Don’t get me wrong: I love reading, and writing, long reviews. But I also enjoy reading short reviews, and writing them, too. Some of the most fun I’ve had as a reviewer was doing several “snap judgment” pieces (around 100 words) for Newsweek. It was an intriguing challenge to try to get something meaningful into this format—and I didn’t have to worry (as I often do even with longer pieces) about leaving key things out.

I’ve even been musing lately about the potential for tweet-length reviews. I don’t want those to displace other kinds, especially because they can too easily seem like glorified blurbs. But the best nuggets of some reviews could work pretty well within Twitter’s haiku-like constraints. Take my assessment of Kissinger’s On China. When I reviewed it for the June 13 edition of Time‘s Asian edition, I was happy that the editors gave me a full-page spread. Still, a pretty nifty Twitter-friendly version could have been built around the best line from the Time piece: “Skip bloated sections on Chinese culture, focus on parts about author’s time in China—a fat book w/ a better skinnier one trying to get out.”

ADVERTISEMENT

One short review—admittedly of a film rather than a book—that made a big impression on me recently was Anthony Lane’s skewering of Transformers: Dark of the Moon, which ran in The New Yorker and reappeared in the “Listings” section of later issues in a slimmer form (roughly “snap judgment” length). The review was so good in its economical use of words that I’ve decided that if Lane ever takes up haiku, I may have to start reading more poems that can’t be sung. The review ends as follows: “The cast is filled out by, in descending order of expressiveness, Frances McDormand, John Malkovich, John Turturro, several enormous lumps of metal, and Rosie Huntington-Whiteley, who plays the hero’s girlfriend. Running time: immeasurable.”

I’d love to close with that line. It’s a step too far to end even an idiosyncratic survey of book reviews with discussion of a movie, however, so I need to add another sentence. With that review, Anthony Lane became the latest writer whose next book I’ll buy—just to see if it’s as good as his reviews lead me to think it will be.

Jeffrey Wasserstrom is chairman of the history department at the University of California at Irvine, author of China in the 21st Century: What Everyone Needs to Know (Oxford University Press, 2010), and co-editor of the anthology Chinese Characters: Fast-Changing Lives in a Fast-Changing Land, due out next year from the University of California Press.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Opinion
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

UCLA students, researchers and demonstrators rally during a "Kill the Cuts" protest against the Trump administration's funding cuts on research, health and higher education at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) in Los Angeles on April 8, 2025.
Scholarship & Research
Trump Proposed Slashing the National Science Foundation’s Budget. A Key Senate Committee Just Refused.
Illustration of a steamroller rolling over a colorful road and leaving gray asphalt in its wake.
Newly Updated
Oregon State U. Will End a Renowned Program That Aimed to Reduce Bias in Hiring
Dr. Gregory Washington, president of George Mason University.
Another probe
George Mason President Discriminated Against White People After George Floyd Protests, Justice Dept. Says
Protesters gather outside the Department of Education headquarters in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 14, 2025 to protest the Trump administrations cuts at the agency.
An Uncertain Future
The Education Dept. Got a Green Light to Shrink. Here Are 3 Questions About What’s Next.

From The Review

Photo-based illustration with repeated images of a student walking, in the pattern of a graph trending down, then up.
The Review | Opinion
7 Ways Community Colleges Can Boost Enrollment
By Bob Levey
Illustration of an ocean tide shaped like Donald Trump about to wash away sandcastles shaped like a college campus.
The Review | Essay
Why Universities Are So Powerless in Their Fight Against Trump
By Jason Owen-Smith
Photo-based illustration of a closeup of a pencil meshed with a circuit bosrd
The Review | Essay
How Are Students Really Using AI?
By Derek O'Connell

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin