Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    A Culture of Cybersecurity
    Opportunities in the Hard Sciences
    Career Preparation
Sign In
Government

Will College Ratings Hurt Minority Students? Here’s Why Researchers Are Wary

By Kelly Field September 2, 2014
Washington

You’ve probably heard of “food deserts"—those low-income communities with limited access to affordable and nutritious groceries. But what about education deserts?

According to research that will be discussed Tuesday on Capitol Hill, there are hundreds of them: More than 34 million Americans—over 10 percent of the nation’s population—live in communities where public colleges are either scarce or nonexistent.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

You’ve probably heard of “food deserts"—those low-income communities with limited access to affordable and nutritious groceries. But what about education deserts?

According to research that will be discussed Tuesday on Capitol Hill, there are hundreds of them: More than 34 million Americans—over 10 percent of the nation’s population—live in communities where public colleges are either scarce or nonexistent.

Compared to communities with more learning options, education deserts are more likely to have growing Hispanic populations, lower educational-attainment rates, and a larger share of the work force employed in manufacturing. Many have only one public institution, typically a community college.

Those findings, argues Nicholas W. Hillman, an assistant professor of education leadership and policy at the University of Wisconsin at Madison, have important implications for President Obama’s college-rating system, due out this fall.

After all, if the sole public college in a community receives a poor rating and becomes ineligible to award federal student aid, residents could be left with no affordable options.

“Federal officials may operate with the belief that a rating system is a tool for improving college ‘choices’ and to help students seek out ‘better’ institutions,” he writes. “In many communities, these can be false alternatives.”

He urges the Obama administration to consider geographic factors, such as the availability of public education, when rating colleges, and suggests waivers for places with long histories of low educational attainment. Failing to account for the “geography of opportunity” could “disproportionately burden minority and working-class communities that have a long history of educational inequality,” he warns.

Mr. Hillman’s paper is one of seven that researchers will present at the Congressional briefing, organized by the Civil Rights Project at the University of California at Los Angeles. The briefing’s title poses a question—"Do Higher Ed Accountability Proposals Narrow Opportunity for Minority Students and Minority-Serving Institutions?"—and the answer from researchers presenting there is, generally, “yes.”

Many of the arguments raised at the briefing will be familiar to veterans of the ratings debate. In addition to Mr. Hillman’s access concerns, a few other themes will probably emerge:

College completion starts in high school, if not earlier.

ADVERTISEMENT

One paper, written by Stella M. Flores, an associate professor of public policy and higher education at Vanderbilt University, and two colleagues, examines the college-completion gap between minority and white students in Texas. Using a “variance decomposition” analysis, the researchers find that more than half of the gap can be explained by “pre-college” characteristics of students and their high schools. The study concludes that it would be “unfair and perhaps even inefficient” for the Obama administration to judge colleges based on student outcomes without accounting for factors beyond the colleges’ control.

“Even if such an approach led to a higher completion rate, the obvious casualties, without significant interventions, will be students who entered college with less resources and academic preparation than their nondisadvantaged student counterparts,” they write.

Ratings don’t account for risk …

A third paper, by Sylvia Hurtado and colleagues at UCLA’s Higher Education Research Institute, adjusts raw graduation rates to account for either student characteristics or institutional resources, and identifies 108 less-selective institutions that do a better-than-expected job of graduating low-income, first-generation, and minority students. The researchers dub them “engines of economic opportunity.”

ADVERTISEMENT

They recommend that the president identify and reward such universities and warn that if the administration doesn’t adjust its metrics for risk, many broad-access institutions will be compelled to tighten their admissions standards.

… but risk adjustment is risky, too.

Other research suggests that risk adjustment comes with its own set of risks. Anne-Marie Nuñez, an associate professor of educational leadership and policy studies at the University of Texas at San Antonio, and Awilda Rodriguez, an assistant professor at the Center for the Study of Higher and Postsecondary Education at the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor, examined how Hispanic-serving institutions—colleges that have a Hispanic enrollment of at least 25 percent—would fare under a regression-adjusted approach.

They found that the adjustments can be “volatile” at the institutional level, varying widely depending on the variables used. They suggest that federal officials collect more data to evaluate institutional performance, including selectivity and preparedness measures, and “resist the temptation to implement high-stakes financial-aid policies” that could penalize underrepresented students and the colleges that serve them.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Law & Policy Political Influence & Activism
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Kelly Field
Kelly Field joined The Chronicle of Higher Education in 2004 and covered federal higher-education policy. She continues to write for The Chronicle on a freelance basis.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Harvard University
'Deeply Unsettling'
Harvard’s Battle With Trump Escalates as Research Money Is Suddenly Canceled
Photo-based illustration of a hand and a magnifying glass focusing on a scene from Western Carolina Universiy
Equal Opportunity
The Trump Administration Widens Its Scrutiny of Colleges, With Help From the Internet
Santa J. Ono, president of the University of Michigan, watches a basketball game on the campus in November 2022.
'He Is a Chameleon'
At U. of Michigan, Frustrations Grew Over a President Who Couldn’t Be Pinned Down
Photo-based illustration of University of Michigan's president Jeremy Santa Ono emerging from a red shape of Florida
Leadership
A Major College-President Transition Is Defined by an About-Face on DEI

From The Review

Photo-based illustration of a college building under an upside down baby crib
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Must Stop Infantilizing Everyone
By Gregory Conti
Photo illustration of Elon Musk and the Dome of the U.S. Capitol
The Review | Opinion
On Student Aid, It’s Congressional Republicans vs. DOGE
By Robert Gordon, Jordan Matsudaira
Photo-based illustration of a closeup of a blue-toned eye with a small hand either pushing or pulling a red piece of film over the top
The Review | Essay
We Don’t Need More Administrators Inspecting Our Ideas
By Nicolas Langlitz

Upcoming Events

Ascendium_06-10-25_Plain.png
Views on College and Alternative Pathways
Coursera_06-17-25_Plain.png
AI and Microcredentials
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin