Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
Faculty

Wisconsin’s Fight Over Faculty Rights: What’s at Stake, and What’s Next

By Peter Schmidt June 4, 2015

Faculty advocates are up in arms over proposed legislation in Wisconsin calling for a sweeping overhaul of the state’s public-university system. The measure, passed by the Legislature’s Joint Committee on Finance as part of negotiations on the state budget, would greatly reduce faculty members’ say in the University of Wisconsin system’s affairs and scrap state laws providing them job protections such as tenure.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Faculty advocates are up in arms over proposed legislation in Wisconsin calling for a sweeping overhaul of the state’s public-university system. The measure, passed by the Legislature’s Joint Committee on Finance as part of negotiations on the state budget, would greatly reduce faculty members’ say in the University of Wisconsin system’s affairs and scrap state laws providing them job protections such as tenure.

Gov. Scott Walker, a Republican who set in motion the effort to overhaul the university system, and the leading Republican lawmakers who back the measure argue that the system needs to become more top-down and nimble to remain competitive. Faculty representatives who oppose the bill argue it will trigger an exodus of talented professors and hinder the system’s efforts to recruit top scholars.

The American Association of University Professors urged system officials on Wednesday to fight the legislation and keep current state law intact. The group’s letter to them called the proposed changes in faculty-employment rights, along with a proposed $250-million reduction in the system’s state appropriation, “a direct attack on higher education as a public good.”

The system’s regents are expected to discuss the legislation, and how they might respond to it, when they meet on Friday. What follows is an analysis of the legislation’s prospects and potential impact, with answers to many of the questions being asked by observers of the Wisconsin debate.

What’s at stake for faculty members?

Wisconsin stands apart in how it has enshrined shared governance and college faculty members’ job protections in state law. They first entered into state statute through the legislation that merged a state-college system with the University of Wisconsin in the early 1970s.

Although a few other states, such as California and Washington, have laws touching upon college faculty members’ tenure rights, most of those provisions cover only instructors at community colleges, stemming from historical ties between those colleges and public schools. Nearly every other state leaves it up to colleges’ governing boards or systems to set the terms of employment for their faculty members.

The proposed change in Wisconsin law would scrub from the original legislation both tenure protections and provisions giving faculty members responsibility for the immediate governance of their institutions. It would delete from that law provisions saying that faculty members automatically qualify for tenure after seven years and that tenured faculty members can be fired only for just cause.

It would also alter a separate law dealing with layoffs of tenured faculty members to allow their dismissal not just in response to financial emergencies, but whenever necessary as a result of budgetary or programmatic decisions.

What employment rights does the proposed law leave professors?

ADVERTISEMENT

The university system’s faculty members would be left with rights similar to those Wisconsin affords to any other public employee. They include a right to advance notice of, and an explanation for, any layoff decision, and a right to appeal decisions they regard as discriminatory based on incorrect information or in violation of the university board’s own procedures. Faculty members also would have a distinct appeal right for any employment dismissal they believe to have come in response to conduct or speech covered by academic freedom.

Would the bill strip tenure from professors who already have it?

Almost certainly not. No less an authority than the U.S. Constitution, in Article I, Section 10, prohibits states from enacting laws that impair the obligation of contracts. As a result, the state would almost certainly face an expensive legal fight if it failed to grandfather in tenure for the professors who already have it under state law.

How would the measure change university governance?

ADVERTISEMENT

It states that the faculty’s role in university governance shall be purely advisory, and it leaves the faculty subordinate to the system’s board, president, and campus chancellors. The proposal would give chancellors significantly more power over spending decisions on their respective campuses, and would require the faculty of each campus to ensure that its organizational structures include adequate representation from academic disciplines related to science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.

Does the measure stand much chance of passing?

Yes. It generally reflects Gov. Scott Walker’s thinking on university governance, and it has widespread support among the Republicans who hold a majority in the state’s Senate and Assembly. Noel Radomski, director of the Wisconsin Center for the Advancement of Postsecondary Education, is highly critical of the proposed legislation but nonetheless characterizes it as “pretty much a done deal.”

What, if anything, would university-system or campus leaders be able to do to restore faculty members’ job protections and say in governance?

ADVERTISEMENT

Not much. The proposed legislation fairly clearly spells out faculty rights and powers in both areas, tying system officials’ hands.

It’s also unclear whether the officials will want to exercise any wiggle room they might have to restore faculty members’ old job rights and powers. Of the Board of Regents’ 18 members, 16 are appointed by the governor, subject to the state Senate’s approval.

Governor Walker has made a name for himself among Republicans by mounting successful efforts to curb the power of unions representing public-college faculty members and other state employees. He and his board appointees almost certainly know where each other stand.

Peter Schmidt writes about affirmative action, academic labor, and issues related to academic freedom. Contact him at peter.schmidt@chronicle.com.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Peter Schmidt
Peter Schmidt was a senior writer for The Chronicle of Higher Education. He covered affirmative action, academic labor, and issues related to academic freedom. He is a co-author of The Merit Myth: How Our Colleges Favor the Rich and Divide America (The New Press, 2020).
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Vector illustration of large open scissors  with several workers in seats dangling by white lines
Iced Out
Duke Administrators Accused of Bypassing Shared-Governance Process in Offering Buyouts
Illustration showing money being funnelled into the top of a microscope.
'A New Era'
Higher-Ed Associations Pitch an Alternative to Trump’s Cap on Research Funding
Illustration showing classical columns of various heights, each turning into a stack of coins
Endowment funds
The Nation’s Wealthiest Small Colleges Just Won a Big Tax Exemption
WASHINGTON, DISTICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES - 2025/04/14: A Pro-Palestinian demonstrator holding a sign with Release Mahmud Khalil written on it, stands in front of the ICE building while joining in a protest. Pro-Palestinian demonstrators rally in front of the ICE building, demanding freedom for Mahmoud Khalil and all those targeted for speaking out against genocide in Palestine. Protesters demand an end to U.S. complicity and solidarity with the resistance in Gaza. (Photo by Probal Rashid/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Campus Activism
An Anonymous Group’s List of Purported Critics of Israel Helped Steer a U.S. Crackdown on Student Activists

From The Review

John T. Scopes as he stood before the judges stand and was sentenced, July 2025.
The Review | Essay
100 Years Ago, the Scopes Monkey Trial Discovered Academic Freedom
By John K. Wilson
Vector illustration of a suited man with a pair of scissors for a tie and an American flag button on his lapel.
The Review | Opinion
A Damaging Endowment Tax Crosses the Finish Line
By Phillip Levine
University of Virginia President Jim Ryan keeps his emotions in check during a news conference, Monday, Nov. 14, 2022 in Charlottesville. Va. Authorities say three people have been killed and two others were wounded in a shooting at the University of Virginia and a student is in custody. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)
The Review | Opinion
Jim Ryan’s Resignation Is a Warning
By Robert Zaretsky

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin