> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
Students
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

With a Strong Stance on Safe Spaces, U. of Chicago Sends a Mixed Message to Students

By  Beth McMurtrie
August 26, 2016
A student reads on the campus of the U. of Chicago. A letter to freshmen this week from the dean of students about safe spaces, trigger warnings, and free speech set off a furious debate. While some applauded the clarity of the letter, others found it callous, out of touch, or simply misunderstood.
Alamy
A student reads on the campus of the U. of Chicago. A letter to freshmen this week from the dean of students about safe spaces, trigger warnings, and free speech set off a furious debate. While some applauded the clarity of the letter, others found it callous, out of touch, or simply misunderstood.

The University of Chicago may have put itself at the forefront of a national debate over academic freedom by taking a hard line against shielding students from disagreeable ideas. But a letter from the dean of students that went viral on Thursday exposed continuing internal conflicts on the campus about free speech, protests, and trigger warnings.

The academic year has not yet started, but on social media some students applauded the letter from John Ellison to incoming freshmen. In it he wrote: “Our commitment to academic freedom means that we do not support so-called ‘trigger warnings,’ we do not cancel invited speakers because their topics might prove controversial, and we do not condone the creation of intellectual ‘safe spaces,’ where individuals can retreat from ideas and perspectives at odds with their own.”

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

A student reads on the campus of the U. of Chicago. A letter to freshmen this week from the dean of students about safe spaces, trigger warnings, and free speech set off a furious debate. While some applauded the clarity of the letter, others found it callous, out of touch, or simply misunderstood.
Alamy
A student reads on the campus of the U. of Chicago. A letter to freshmen this week from the dean of students about safe spaces, trigger warnings, and free speech set off a furious debate. While some applauded the clarity of the letter, others found it callous, out of touch, or simply misunderstood.

The University of Chicago may have put itself at the forefront of a national debate over academic freedom by taking a hard line against shielding students from disagreeable ideas. But a letter from the dean of students that went viral on Thursday exposed continuing internal conflicts on the campus about free speech, protests, and trigger warnings.

The academic year has not yet started, but on social media some students applauded the letter from John Ellison to incoming freshmen. In it he wrote: “Our commitment to academic freedom means that we do not support so-called ‘trigger warnings,’ we do not cancel invited speakers because their topics might prove controversial, and we do not condone the creation of intellectual ‘safe spaces,’ where individuals can retreat from ideas and perspectives at odds with their own.”

Other students found his words condescending, arguing that the university seemed at times to ignore minority viewpoints.

“Sometimes I think it’s like two ships passing in the night,” said Adam Biesman, a junior who is an incoming member of the student government. “The university’s statement is that this is very focused on academic inquiry, this is what we’re talking about when you have trigger warnings. Their goal is to say we can’t censor academia, and this is how you become better students and thinkers. But a lot of students are not focusing on that part. And they think the university is almost actively trying to ignore other people’s experiences.”

In January 2015 the university adopted a statement of free expression on the campus that was heralded as a model for other institutions. It said that students should not be protected from ideas that “they find unwelcome, disagreeable, or even deeply offensive,” and that speakers should be unhindered by student protesters. The campus since then has been the site of several protests. In February members of the Black Lives Matter movement disrupted a speech by the Cook County state’s attorney, and supporters of the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement against Israel confronted a speaker who was critical of the cause.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sometimes I think it’s like two ships passing in the night.

Matthew Foldi, a junior and president of the College Republicans, asked the student government last spring to adopt a resolution that would condemn the disruption of free speech on the campus. The decision to shelve the resolution, combined with the protests, he said, had probably helped inspire the letter.

“All these events clearly showed the administration a lack of understanding among enough of the student body, including students in position of authority, that they felt compelled to give students a heads-up so that they know what institution they are about to enroll in,” he said.

Mr. Foldi and Mr. Biesman strongly supported the dean’s letter. “As someone who has tried to fight for those values, I was pleased the university was taking a pro-inquiry, pro-discussion, and pro-debate position,” said Mr. Biesman.

‘Very Callous’

But the message, and some of the particular phrasing, offended others. Elizabeth Adetiba, a senior, called it “very callous.”

“The use of quotations — so-called trigger warnings, so-called safe spaces — to be honest with you, it was a little juvenile,” said Ms. Adetiba, who was on the dean’s advisory council with Mr. Ellison two years ago. “It seems the year I and other people spent talking with him about our experiences, it was like he didn’t hear any of that.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The use of quotations — so-called trigger warnings, so-called safe spaces — to be honest with you, it was a little juvenile.

She also said that she had never heard any student call for an intellectual safe space. “I don’t think the students are advocating for getting a free pass, looking at the syllabus and saying, ‘Oh, I don’t like this topic, I’m not going to go to class.’” And trigger warnings, she said, are just that: warnings of what’s ahead, not censorship. “It just gives you a second or two to do what you need to do to prepare.”

Ms. Adetiba said that campus leaders sometimes want to determine for students what is legitimate expression and what is not. She considered the protesters who interrupted the speech by the state’s attorney, for example, to be exercising their rights.

“Oftentimes the people who are defining free speech are people of a certain demographic,” she said: well off, white, and male. “They’re coming from a perspective that is 180 degrees to mine, someone who grew up black, lower-income, and is a woman.”

Karl E.H. Seigfried, a student in the university’s Divinity School and president of Interfaith Dialogue, a student organization, tweeted out on Thursday that he was making his group a safe space on the campus for members of minority religious traditions. In an email on Friday he said he worried that people in higher education sometimes take stances against safe spaces and trigger warnings in order to maintain a status quo in which women and minorities do not feel safe speaking out.

“I am not sure that receiving such a letter from upper administration,” he wrote, “effectively communicates the University of Chicago’s true and real dedication to an open dialogue in which a young Latina student can raise her hand in class and strongly challenge a statement made by a senior faculty member without fear of reprisal.”

ADVERTISEMENT

University administrators did not respond to requests for comment about Mr. Ellison’s letter.

Geoffrey R. Stone, a law professor and former provost who led the committee on freedom of expression, which drafted the 2015 statement articulating the university’s commitment to free debate, said elements of the dean’s letter had been misunderstood. Faculty members can still give trigger warnings if they wish to, and students can create their own intellectual safe spaces on the campus. What Mr. Ellison meant, he said, “is that the university itself isn’t an intellectual safe space.”

“I think the intent was to say to entering students, Welcome, you’re coming to this amazing place, and we think you’re great,” he said. In September, Mr. Stone will be speaking to incoming freshmen about the university’s commitment to freedom of expression.

Beth McMurtrie writes about campus culture, among other things. Follow her on Twitter @bethmcmurtrie, or email her at beth.mcmurtrie@chronicle.com.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Beth McMurtrie
Beth McMurtrie is a senior writer for The Chronicle of Higher Education, where she writes about the future of learning and technology’s influence on teaching. In addition to her reported stories, she helps write the weekly Teaching newsletter about what works in and around the classroom. Email her at beth.mcmurtrie@chronicle.com, and follow her on Twitter @bethmcmurtrie.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

  • A Brief Guide to the Battle Over Trigger Warnings
  • Free Expression in Peril
  • In a Time of Tension, Universities Craft New Free-Speech Policies
  • Colleges Draw Hard Lines Against Calls to Restrict Speech
  • Speaker Beware
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin