Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    Trump Webinar Series
    Mental Health Forum
    Using Big Data to Improve Social Mobility
Sign In
First Person

Writing a Preproposal: Leave Them Wanting More

More and more grant agencies, faced with too many applications, are asking researchers to submit a preliminary version for review

By Karen M. Markin January 21, 2015
Careers - stack of papers
Sara Grajeda / Creative Commons

Whether they call it a preproposal, a concept paper, a white paper, or an extended abstract, many federal agencies are now asking applicants to begin the grant quest by submitting a short description of their projects. Much like first-round job interview, the purpose of the preproposal is to help agencies narrow the pool and invite the most promising applicants to submit a full grant proposal.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Whether they call it a preproposal, a concept paper, a white paper, or an extended abstract, many federal agencies are now asking applicants to begin the grant quest by submitting a short description of their projects. Much like first-round job interview, the purpose of the preproposal is to help agencies narrow the pool and invite the most promising applicants to submit a full grant proposal.

Academics, having slogged their way through ponderous dissertations, are not accustomed to writing concise, persuasive descriptions of their work. But being able to do so is becoming important to a successful academic career. As a university grant officer, I’d like to offer some tips on how to write a preproposal that will earn you an invitation to the real competition.

Among the federal agencies that have requested preliminary proposals are the Department of Energy, the Education Department, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, and certain divisions at the National Science Foundation. The idea here is to reduce the workload of everyone involved in the grant-making process.

Federal research dollars have remained steady in the last few years, but scientists submit increasing numbers of proposals, resulting in declining award rates. Agencies are pursuing a variety of strategies to minimize the effort expended on this excess of proposals. This past fall, for example, I wrote about how some agencies are limiting the number of applications that a single institution can submit. And another way is to request a short initial application to determine whether the idea warrants the labor involved in preparing and reviewing a lengthy full proposal.

Preproposal competitions tend to have a low success rate. Don’t let that intimidate you. Part of the reason is that, because the application is short, lots of people apply and some of their applications are not carefully prepared. By putting some thought into yours, you already have an advantage.

A preliminary proposal is not just a condensed version of a full proposal. Remember, the purpose of the preproposal is to excite at least one member of the review panel enough to advocate for a full proposal from you. A faculty member I know offered a good analogy: Think of the preproposal as a movie trailer for your full proposal. You need to sell reviewers on the idea, establish its scientific soundness, and document your ability to carry out the proposed work.

The requirements for these initial proposals come in a variety of forms, from one-page executive summaries to eight-page extended abstracts (eight pages is still a lot shorter than a full proposal). How you prepare the preproposal depends on the federal agency and its purpose. Follow the agency’s instructions to the letter. If it provides an outline for preliminary proposals, use it. And don’t prepare the preproposal hastily, even though it’s short. Reviewers will be able to tell that you threw it together without much thought.

At the NSF, two divisions within the Directorate for Biological Sciences require a four-page preproposal. It must include objectives, significance, the research question, the research approach, and the broader impacts of the project. Use your publications list to illustrate your ability to use the methodology you propose. In my conversations with successful applicants, many have said it helps to have preliminary data in the preproposal.

The approach you take is slightly different when submitting a preproposal to one of the so-called mission-driven agencies, such as Darpa, NASA, and DOE, which exist to focus on narrow issues (rather than basic science like the NSF). It is still important to be clear and concise in your preproposal, but it is also critical that you deal with the agency’s needs explicitly.

Agencies typically issue lengthy “broad agency announcements” that provide an overview of the types of work they want to support. For each category of work discussed in that announcement, a program manager’s name is listed. Contact that person upfront to make sure the agency is interested in what you want to do. As one investigator told me, that contact is crucial because those announcements change little from year to year. Making changes to a program announcement is a time-consuming bureaucratic approval process, but the agency’s needs do continue to evolve. Its interest may be waxing in one subfield and waning in another. You won’t know unless you speak with a program officer.

ADVERTISEMENT

Program officers for the mission-driven agencies have more power over grant decisions than those at the agencies that emphasize peer review. The mission-oriented agencies support research that is much more applied, so ask specifically what they want and how they want it accomplished. Then prepare your preproposal accordingly.

It helps to know something about the review process at the agency you are applying to. At some, such as NSF, the review panels change frequently, and a resubmission may be read by a completely new group of reviewers. It can be difficult to determine what they will support.

At other agencies, such as NASA, panels don’t change much from year to year. A successful applicant said NASA reviewers know what they want, and they have a sharp eye, so it is important to submit a quality proposal with a good idea and a novel approach. Focus on the potential impact of your work and how it will advance the agency’s mission and reputation. Also show that you and your research team are qualified to perform the work. If you can use agency data for your study—for example, satellite data—do so.

Because preproposals are short, reviewers sometimes read dozens of them. They are going to get tired, and you don’t want your submission to be the one that makes the reviewer stop reading and go for coffee. Share the excitement you have over your work, and document your qualifications, or you won’t get the opportunity to elaborate on it in a full proposal.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Scholarship & Research
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Karen M. Markin
Karen M. Markin is director of research development at the University of Rhode Island’s research office.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Illustration showing three classical columns on stacks of coins, at different heights due to the amount of coins stacked underneath
Data
These 32 Colleges Could Take a Financial Hit Under Republicans’ Expanded Endowment Tax
Conti-0127
Finance
Here’s What Republicans’ Proposed College-Endowment Tax Could Look Like
Illustration of a magnifying glass highlighting the phrase "including the requirements set forth in Presidential Executive Order 14168 titled Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government."
The Fine Print
The NIH Is Requiring Grantees to Follow Trump’s Anti-Trans Executive Order
New York City police arrested dozens of Pro-Palestinian protesters on Columbia University on Wednesday evening after they took over part of a central library in New York, USA on May 7, 2025.
'A Different Playbook'
Facing New Protests and Political Pressure, Colleges Are Taking a Harder Line

From The Review

Illustration depicting a pendulum with a red ball featuring a portion of President Trump's face to the left about to strike balls showing a group of protesters.
The Review | Opinion
Trump Is Destroying DEI With the Same Tools That Built It
By Noliwe M. Rooks
Illustration showing two men and giant books, split into two sides—one blue and one red. The two men are reaching across the center color devide to shake hands.
The Review | Opinion
Left and Right Agree: Higher Ed Needs to Change
By Michael W. Clune
University of British Columbia president and vice-chancellor Santa Ono pauses while speaking during a memorandum of understanding  signing ceremony between the Tsilhqot'in National Government and UBC, in Vancouver, British Columbia, on Dec. 8, 2021.
The Review | Opinion
Santa Ono Flees for Florida
By Silke-Maria Weineck

Upcoming Events

Plain_USF_AIWorkForce_VF.png
New Academic Programs for an AI-Driven Work Force
Cincy_Plain.png
Hands-On Career Preparation
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin