Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
Sign In
Brainstorm Logo-Icon

Brainstorm

Ideas and culture.

Why Your Last Hire Was a Freakin’ Disaster

By Jacques Berlinerblau January 12, 2011
“To hell with the catalog course description! Fasten your seatbelts! It’s Zizek all the way, you little shmendriks!”
“To hell with the catalog course description! Fasten your seatbelts! It’s Zizek all the way, you little shmendriks!”

Maybe it’s time to just fess up and admit that your last job search didn’t work out too good.

It has come to your attention that your recently hired tenure-track faculty member has been sitting in his office, door wide open, playing jacks for the past three hours.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

“To hell with the catalog course description! Fasten your seatbelts! It’s Zizek all the way, you little shmendriks!”
“To hell with the catalog course description! Fasten your seatbelts! It’s Zizek all the way, you little shmendriks!”

Maybe it’s time to just fess up and admit that your last job search didn’t work out too good.

It has come to your attention that your recently hired tenure-track faculty member has been sitting in his office, door wide open, playing jacks for the past three hours.

Or, maybe he has just informed the chair that he doesn’t “do” Gateway courses. Or, perhaps a scene out of Nabokov’s Pnin has been reenacted; the new hire doesn’t actually speak the language he was hired to teach.

ADVERTISEMENT

The committee may indeed have been “unified in its recommendation,” but from where you’re standing now it was also unified in error.

I have come to the conclusion that this is more or less the norm in academe. For every 10 hires, I would estimate, 2.2 are ultimately “keepers”; three are “indiscretions”; as regards the other 4.5, well, the less said the better. (As for the remaining three-tenths, they failed to apprise you of their actual visa status and never made it back to the States).

In my old age I have developed my own set of metrics for successful job searches. If the process doesn’t end in litigation—then the committee ought be commended for a job well done!

Failed searches are a toxic mixture of an uneven “talent” pool, bewildering academic mores, and our—I mean the professoriate’s—unique culture of dysfunction.

What follows are the major reasons why so many attempts to fill positions go frighteningly awry. Service-oriented solutions follow.

ADVERTISEMENT

Because half the committee didn’t read the damn CV’s: I am as guilty of this sin as the next person. In my defense I did once sit on a committee that received 835 applications (might we have conceived of the position a bit too broadly?).

Even when one receives the standard 75 submissions it is hard to imagine how, busy as we are, faculty members could spend more than 10 minutes on each candidate. There are too many applicants, too many other committees.

Solution: Although it may end up looking like a scene out of The Office, try having a few “CV Parties” in which all committee members peruse the applications together over coffee and high-transfat crullers.

Deputize the newest, most junior, or least powerful member of the search committee to informally lead the discussion. This inversion of power dynamics is a necessary precaution. . . .

Because your department is completely dysfunctional: Here lies the root of many a catastrophe. The inter-personal relations that develop in academic units are: 1) worthy of fictional portrayal, and somehow at the same time, 2) not fictionally compelling.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ever have a job search come apart at the seams because one faculty member is still seething over being assigned the “Methods” course in the Friday 3:45 pm slot? I have.

I have also seen senior faculty coerce junior faculty into settling on Melinda when it is clear that Lizette was the better option.(Lizette, by the way, gets the last laugh. She’s now an investment banker at Goldman Sachs.)

Solution: Effective deans notice things—like when the musicology department’s last six hires were scholars who approached their subject matter “primarily, but not exclusively, from a Deleuzian Maoist perspective"—and respond appropriately.

Anecdote: The single most talented scholar I ever hired originally graded out as ninth on my list of 25 candidates. It was only when two colleagues placed me in a headlock and rammed me into a filing cabinet that I was able to realize my error. That clarified things. Ability to admit error—the most important attribute of a highly effective committee member.

“Because only my graduate school produces doctorates who are worthy of working in our department": Do I even need to elaborate?

ADVERTISEMENT

Because someone on the committee once did summer stock theater (Guys and Dolls) with the eventual first choice: Previously existing, albeit unreported, relations with colleagues are a leading cause of searches gone hopelessly askew.

Years back, we were all sitting around celebrating a “home run” selection—as you may imagine our views on that changed in due course—when an ebullient colleague blurted out: “Thank God we got Corey. I could have never voted for Richard, he looked too much like my ex-husband.”

Solution: At the aforementioned CV party the chair should request conscientious full disclosure of all preexisting relations with applicants. The presence of university counsel and uniformed campus police at the party might be helpful.

Because you overlooked the adjunct in your (campus) gate: Every university has a bevy of part-timers on staff who have produced more quality research and taught more skillfully than assorted tenured colleagues.

Every full-timer has a friend like this (trust me though, they hate you). The ubiquity of these high-performing adjuncts belies the idea that American universities are meritocratic institutions.

ADVERTISEMENT

Solution: Realize that fresh faces aren’t always the answer. An individual who has contributed, let’s say, a decade of good service to a university at absurdly low wages might be considered more like a “front runner” than a recipient of a “courtesy interview.”

Because the letters of recommendation are not always elucidating: My favorite case being the scholar who pointed out that not only did his doctoral student write about Salman Rushdie, but was, word for word, a better writer than Salman Rushdie.

Aside from pointlessly effusive letters there is the dreaded “hidden message” scenario. Every committee has a self-appointed encryption specialist who insists the phrase “hard worker” or “determined thinker” unequivocally indicates that the person in question is some sort of moron.

Solution: Assign greater value to truly thoughtful letters of reference. Look for referees who seem to have spent time on their recommendations. If a writer identifies a lot of The Good, and some of The Bad then that letter needs to be held in higher esteem than the one whose author’s motto is “if she choose to study with me, she must be brilliant.”

Additional insight: All professors who let grad students write their own letters of rec. and then sign them should never be permitted to recommend another candidate ever again. Ever.

ADVERTISEMENT

Because selecting junior faculty is a total crap shoot anyway: I ask you to consider the National Football League’s annual draft. It occurs every spring and requires that 32 professional football teams assess more than a thousand college athletes.

The process includes scouting departments whose sole purpose is to travel to gridirons in godforsaken parts of America.There, they interview harried college coaches, assistants and academic administrators. After that, they sit in damp basements viewing endless loops of tape for days on end.

The prospects are graded according to rigorous criteria and then reassessed, in person, at a Combine. At this event, even more people, including hundreds of sports journalists, join the scouts to assess talent.

Security and background checks are performed. Intelligence and even psychological evaluations are administered. The process spans roughly nine months and costs each team millions of dollars.

And even with all of that effort, football drafts produce “busts” regularly.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let’s compare that with our process, shall we? Applicants, we established above, are initially assessed--with or without cruller accompaniment--for about 10 minutes. Within the span of a few hours of deliberation 98 percent of them are eliminated from contention.

The three left standing are invited to campus for an afternoon of interviews, a job talk, a meal, and maybe a visit to the Campus Compost Initiative. Total cost to your institution: about $5,000.

Solution: There is no real solution. Senior searches provide us, at least, with the ability to inspect scholarly track records stretching back a decade or more. Searches for young scholars are a stab in the dark.

Years back our very own Chronicle of Higher Education ran a “Where are they now?” piece. The young rising stars of a decade prior were revisited at the fabulous universities that hired them. Needless to say, few were still considered stars. Others were difficult to track down. As for the universities, they remain as fabulous as ever.

(Photo by Flickr user Jo Jakeman)

“To hell with the catalog course description! Fasten your seatbelts! It’s Zizek all the way, you little shmendriks!”
“To hell with the catalog course description! Fasten your seatbelts! It’s Zizek all the way, you little shmendriks!”

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Jacques Berlinerblau
Jacques Berlinerblau (jberlinerblau.com) is a professor of Jewish civilization at Georgetown University and an MSNBC columnist. He writes about political secularism, free-speech controversies in the arts, and American higher education. He is the author of numerous books, including Campus Confidential: How College Works, or Doesn’t, for Professors, Parents, and Students (Melville House). His forthcoming work is Can I Laugh at That? Global Comedic Controversies in the Digital Age (University of California Press).
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Illustration of a magnifying glass highlighting the phrase "including the requirements set forth in Presidential Executive Order 14168 titled Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government."
Policy 'Whiplash'
Research Grants Increasingly Require Compliance With Trump’s Orders. Here’s How Colleges Are Responding.
Photo illustration showing internal email text snippets over a photo of a University of Iowa campus quad
Red-state reticence
Facing Research Cuts, Officials at U. of Iowa Spoke of a ‘Limited Ability to Publicly Fight This’
Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues

From The Review

Football game between UCLA and Colorado University, at Folsom Field in Boulder, Colo., Sept. 24, 2022.
The Review | Opinion
My University Values Football More Than Education
By Sigman Byrd
Photo- and type-based illustration depicting the acronym AAUP with the second A as the arrow of a compass and facing not north but southeast.
The Review | Essay
The Unraveling of the AAUP
By Matthew W. Finkin
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome propped on a stick attached to a string, like a trap.
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Can’t Trust the Federal Government. What Now?
By Brian Rosenberg

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin